Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/10/2020 in all areas

  1. Whats with you having to compare all draft prospects to failed White Sox picks?
    6 points
  2. The injury stuff is being greatly exaggerated. He has some soreness so Tennessee shut him down to protect him in his draft year. That's what good college programs do. If they knew the season was going to be 4 weeks long he would have pitched from the onset. The only other injury was when he was hit in the face with a comebacker. He was back on the mound in 2 weeks pitching with a plate in his broken jaw. This is a tough kid. He's also extremely smart. He's a freakin nuclear engneering major. I love everything about what they would be getting here.
    6 points
  3. I am just thrilled to have actual baseball to talk about again. The thing I have missed more than anything the last three months is competitive sports.
    5 points
  4. Tell me this doesn’t get the juices flowing... Add in a 96+ MPH fastball that’s still gaining velo and wow.
    5 points
  5. The latest update from Baseball America has the Sox taking Mick Abel. This would be awesome. This pick is tricky. Chicago has been connected to Tennessee LHP Garrett Crochet, Detmers and North Carolina State catcher Patrick Bailey—the typical collegiate suspects for the White Sox. However the noise with Mick Abel has been significant enough that we think it’s legit and with a new scouting director in Chicago there’s no guarantee the team continues to heavily target college players. Still, it’s worth noting that Mike Shirley has been with the club in a high-level role going back to 2010.
    5 points
  6. Eh, the Sox can get Ed Howard in four years when they trade for Reynaldo Lopez in a pennant chase
    4 points
  7. I'll say this, I trust this system to develop a hard throwing college lefty a lot more than a high school bat
    4 points
  8. We don't allow our insiders to use their real names to protect them from their hoardes of adoring fans. Screen names only.
    4 points
  9. I’ve never heard this debate I’m only familiar with bad white sox draft comp vs bad white sox draft comp. Im assuming you meant it’s a choice between Aaron poreda or uh *looks through draft history* Steve...uh Steve trout
    4 points
  10. We pick #11. In my opinion (and in no particular order), there is no chance the 6 players below get to us. I'll throw Hancock as #7 even though he could be a guy who conceivably slips. From there, we just have to rank our top 4 players left. So I am basically hoping for Detmers but each of the last few days it seems less and less likely. Past him, Abel's upside is tantalizing and he could possibly be underslot so that'd be my fallback. If Detmers & Abel go in the top 10 I get less excited about our pick. 1. Tork 2. Martin 3. Lacy 4. Gonzalez 5. Veen 6. Meyer 7. Hancock 1. Detmers 2. Abel 3. Hassell 4. Kjersted.
    4 points
  11. I've come around on Crochet. I get it. If you hit on him, you could have a big payoff. If not, you are probably getting an impact reliever with that stupid fastball/slider combo anyways. That's nothing to sneeze at. Couple that with under-slot and some big value like Kelley with pick number 2, and I'm real happy.
    4 points
  12. The Sox were never taking Patrick Bailey. That was always nonsense. That's the thing about Crochet. He's never thrown enough innings to prove to me that he's a starter long-term. He does have pretty electric shit though. There's a chance that had the season continued, he makes 10 starts and he's not even on the board. He's also likely underslot I'd think.
    4 points
  13. not gonna lie if their scouts feel like crochet was different this year...it's just a different draft. I didn't get to see any of these guys. There's highlights and that's cool and all. If the sox swing crochet and get a dynamite #2 that's interesting. Crochet is an insanely talented arm we know very little about. Abel didn't even pitch his senior year. Maybe he gets shelled! Bitsko people are going off his circuit when nobody was scouting him! I'm just saying if they get swing crochet/howard or something it changes it. I could very well see a situation where they felt very similar to a lot of these guys and felt like they could get 2 in the same tier with their budget.
    4 points
  14. Hell yeah I get to get hyped for Kelley all night and tomorrow until he's selected in the first couple picks tomorrow
    3 points
  15. Howard needs to do right by the Sox and turn down millions to go to school.
    3 points
  16. Good better best Matt Thornton Andrew Miller Chris Sale
    3 points
  17. SoxTalk: Anyone but a college bat Draft gets weird, Veen becomes a possibility SoxTalk:
    3 points
  18. The real question is if ESPN skips from pick #10 to #12 with their propensity to entirely forget about the Sox
    3 points
  19. Hilarious that Vaughn is better than Torkelson and yet Torkelson is easily 1-1 because he MIGHT POSSIBLY POTENTIALLY COULD play LF MAYBE. Baseball teams have become so much smarter, yet still have weird stupid rules for prospects.
    3 points
  20. 3 points
  21. Definitely Jake Eder then
    3 points
  22. You guys are overthinking my tweet. Crochet interest seems orchestrated to me. Too many people have it. There's another name frequently mentioned who I believe to be firmly in the mix. It'd be a surprise to many. Not most of you though.
    3 points
  23. Classics Pitcher vs. Thrower debate.
    3 points
  24. It was a hypothetical example to illustrate a concept since someone asked why teams create misdirection. Why don’t you add to that discussion instead of sitting on a high horse?
    3 points
  25. Abel has a much cleaner projectable motion. He will also mature and increase is velocity.
    3 points
  26. I've never seen anyone look more Bama than Tanner Burns
    2 points
  27. There’s huge concerns about his hit tool from what I’ve been told. Like it or not, the Sox were never going to take him in first round given their big league personnel IMO.
    2 points
  28. Technically they taught Hansen command, he just forgot the following season.
    2 points
  29. Yeah, maybe they can teach him to command the ball like they did Alec Hansen.
    2 points
  30. If they drafted a reliever at 11 that's fucking awful.
    2 points
  31. He was ranked #1 on his board until the Sox drafted him
    2 points
  32. I’ve read it wasn’t much more than general soreness and them wanting to preserve him. ”overblown” was one word I heard regarding the injury concern. I do trust our scouting on pitching.
    2 points
  33. I like it. I also hope it's under-slot and allows someone fun to be pushed to pick number 2.
    2 points
  34. DING DING DING. It's not even a question. In a draft with a lot of questions, take the guy with a ton of talent, all the tools, and a great work ethic. A kid you know inside and out. Don't get cute; take the kid with the biggest ceiling there is.
    2 points
  35. I'm surprised ESPN hasn't highlighted all of Spencer Torkelson's dead relatives and friends.
    2 points
  36. No one breaks down mechanics, approach, a swing and video as poorly as Harold Reynolds. Gotta love it.
    2 points
  37. Also, GTFO if you care about spoilers. Like every year, the picks are going to hit twitter before TV, and they get posted here. Fair warning.
    2 points
  38. He was incredible early this season. It's truly a shame we didn't get to see more him. The velocity he added was crazy.
    2 points
  39. There are about 5-6 guys that I'd be fine with them taking at 11. The only way I think I'll truly be disappointed is if Detmers is there and they pass on him.
    2 points
  40. Poreda just had a big fastball. I don't ever remember anything at all about a plus slider and I can't find a record of it online. He was big fastball and that's all people talkied about, supposedly with the beginnings of a feel for a changeup which never turned into anything. Maybe his slider developed more in the minors. Poreda had size, strength, left-handedness and a big fastball. He was a longshot project at best if he was ever thought of as a SP. It was a safe pick also because there was a downside (and really ceiling) of MLB late inning reliever. I don't think Crochet is very risky as far as prospects go. Health and control are risks for most players, but his floor is as a very useful player and the timeline on him could be pretty quick.
    2 points
  41. Should take Detmers Will take Abel Would be happy with Detmers, Abel, Hassell, PCA, Howard, Hendricks unhappy: Crochet, Bailey, Kjerstad on the fence with Soderstrom Im not really interested in safe picks
    2 points
  42. Crochet has a ++ slider and a + changeup. Poreda didn't have a second pitch and threw 97, which backed up to 94 in the pros.
    2 points
  43. Interesting that he is willing to play in 2020, but wants to be released for 2021. That would line up with getting into next years international class quite nicely.
    2 points
  44. 2 points
  45. 1st - Crochet - underslot 2nd - Kelly - way over slot 3rd - someone - underslot to help cover Kelly
    2 points
  46. Also regarding Crochet. I wouldn't be surprised (unless there are still injury concerns) if he pitches out of the bullpen this season if selected. Publications seem to think you are going to see some of the highly regarded college arms deployed in the pen during the shortened season. Max Meyer being the one that is mentioned most. Crochet has a similar profile and the stuff to pull it off.
    2 points
  47. Abel definitely would be risky pick, there are so many failed first round HS pitchers. However of course this is also how you get a kershaw, greinke or Bumgarner (I think they all were drafted like in the 7-10 range overall of the draft) so if it works it also could be really good.
    2 points
This leaderboard is set to Chicago/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...