Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/23/2021 in Posts

  1. White Sox undefeated in hypothetical future innings that never happened. Hooray for that omniscience?
    6 points
  2. 1. How did it work out for Harry? Well after he rejected Jerry Reinsdorf’s offer to announce for his pathetic pay per view scheme which collapsed as an utter failure, Harry made more money, increased his audience by turning a former 50/50 Sox/Cubs town into a 70/30 Cubs/Sox town, and became a national icon. Jerry Reinsdorf, a pariah and architect of a completely dysfunctional mess in two organizations. 2. There are no reports of Yermin carrying a criminal record. You know who is a recidivist criminal, someone no parent should want their child emulating? Your guy Tony. 3. Tony also did not make up steroids, but like the Olympic Games, both have benefited from a steady dose of steroids for decades.“Sportsmanship”
    5 points
  3. The only good thing to come out of this game was Vaughn getting a shot of confidence taking out Chapman.
    4 points
  4. Including a picture says all you need about where his head is at. Doesn’t matter that he persevered long after most guys would have given up and is now excelling at the highest level - a truly great story. All that matters is he looks like the bad man from his television programs.
    4 points
  5. Real contending outfield we have out there
    4 points
  6. Ironically, a child like that resorts to the posting style you do. Like calling someone "sprinkles." Why do that? Because your logic and reasoning can't do all the talking. You're a troll. Off to ignore list you go. Because unlike you, I don't need someone else's attention. "Sprinkles." Never seen a forum where so many trolls are endowed with moderation responsibilities. Like having arsonists guard gas cans. Ironic that a forum that hates Trump so much functions much like a Trump controlled White House.
    3 points
  7. Vaughn should be in the minors. Vaughn missed a year of minor league development. Have you ever worked somewhere and had an employee that was improperly trained but had a good ability for the job? Im sure they made mistakes and it took them longer to catch on. Baseball is a business and Vaughn is an under trained employee. He is doing all the right things for the White Sox and his ability to take over LF and perform at an adequate level has been terrific. The bat will catch up.
    3 points
  8. Does anyone other than me think all these crazy comments and complaints criticizing LaRussa and the gloom and doom panic fueled comments are just getting ridiculous?
    3 points
  9. It was obviously to anyone (other than JR) that he lost the team when he did that. He needs to go. It was awful when they brought him in and it is somehow 10000000 times worse than any of us could have ever imagined. Only a complete fucking idiot would take the wind out the sails of his own team they way he did. It shows on the field and it's only going to get worse.
    3 points
  10. Hey how bout that. You don't need a bunt to move the runner over. How about letting your players STEAL! Novel concept.
    3 points
  11. 3 points
  12. Huh. Vaughn was the only option there. Even benetti knew it before the inning. He had passed over Vaughn countless times in that spot this year. At least he finally learned his lesson. Wonder if we could have won a couple more games now if he went Vaughn over leury/Hamilton earlier
    3 points
  13. It's clear as day that the AL East is big boy baseball. The Sox would be a 500 team if they had to rumble in that division.
    3 points
  14. Seems like a lot of contradictory thinking around here, almost like buyer's remorse. "Be positive! We have arguably the best team is baseball!" Then it shifts to: "Be positive! We can still EASILY win this division! Just keep beating up on shitty AL Central teams! Look at our run differential!" Weird. Almost like a total forfeit of the prior model of thinking. Sorry, I'm not happy just aiming for a Division win when I know our division SUCKS.
    3 points
  15. So much irony and karma to the Sox being unable to score after Tony’s bs
    3 points
  16. And which already banned him...
    3 points
  17. Pal, you managed to describe yourself on 1 sentence and for that I commend you. And Kenwo is a larussa stan and hates on players. I dont see many people here doing either of those things.
    3 points
  18. lol you are out of touch - if you think issues in sportsmanship today are about anything you posted - just stay in your house. Reality would devastate you.
    3 points
  19. Do we even know how long his contract is for? Still to this day I can't seem to find that info.
    2 points
  20. How old are you? Serious question.
    2 points
  21. This is such a terrible take but I can't say I'm surprised.
    2 points
  22. I am convinced Ragah roots against the White Sox and enjoys when they lose. He is the only poster on here who legit takes joy in the Sox losing so he can claim he was "right" about something because apparently good teams never get swept or something.
    2 points
  23. I'm reading all the arguing back and forth about how TLR used the BP and it seems rather odd to me in some way . Once again we saw Marshall and Ruiz, Bummer and Hendriks. This is one time I'm not upset with how TLR used Bummer and Hendriks . Yeah Bummer gave up the hit and the stolen base. But if you want to say Hendriks should've started the inning or Bummer taken out after a hit it's basically either hindsight or splitting hairs. Either could've been done but it wasn't but not because TLR is stupid. Even after the hit you would think Bummer being LH would be able to hold the runner better than Hendriks so not bringing Hendriks in then wasn't a bad decision. Not holding the runner was the worst part and I would like to think that the catcher, pitching coach or manager might stress that since it's the potential winning run. Once the stolen base happened , you have to walk the next guy and if you want a DP yea, you leave Bummer in. I don't have a problem with Hendriks being brought in when he was. Nothing worked out with your set up guy and closer, both of whom were supposed to be among the best in those spots all year. I highly doubt Hendriks cares that much when he's brought in. The guy wants to pitch as much as he can. But anyway that's my take but I had a bigger point to make and one that no one here ever mentions but it's food for thought so here we go. How much is TLR handicapped that 2 of our best relievers are under strict pitching guidelines ? For instance Kopech is on an innings limit and is used in multiple inning roles such as spot starter and middle relief requiring more than an inning usually. So he basically isn't used as a 7th inning guy or even an every other day type reliever . That role has been going to guys who have been been bad, Heuer, Marshall,Foster and Ruiz a lot. They are also babying Crochet along. He's pitched less innings than any other of the main guys in the BP even though he gets the best results . So like I said food for thought. Not trying to stick up for TLR , just trying my best to be an unbiased observer and remove the emotion from it all. When you can't use our 2 best guys in late inning situations it makes managing the BP way harder and also why a reliever or 2 should be priority one at the trade deadline or as soon as possible because things are not going to change with Kopech and Crochet.
    2 points
  24. The offense scored 5 runs over 3 games at Yankee Stadium.
    2 points
  25. And you actually think Rick Hahn knows baseball?
    2 points
  26. Another looming problem is how easily they stole a bag off Bummer...scouts I'm sure are taking note of that...completely changed the inning
    2 points
  27. How can you people defend leaving Bummer in until he got the bases loaded? He should have been taken out after the first base runner. I’m not defending Liam either, he has been a waste IMO, but I don’t think any of our BP pitchers could have come into the situation and NOT given up the game.
    2 points
  28. That was Hendriks‘ 2nd walk all season
    2 points
  29. THEY HAD WON 9 STRAIGHT COMING INTO THE SERIES. Jesus, for someone that preaches logic, you’re an absolute dunce.
    2 points
  30. I’m no TLR lover by any means but I didn’t have a problem with Bummer there. Didn’t have a problem with it at all
    2 points
  31. Bullpen was supposed to be a strength of this team and it's turning out to be one of the biggest weaknesses.
    2 points
  32. Another great FA signing by Hahn.
    2 points
  33. Larussa with the great pitch hit call there with Vaughn!
    2 points
  34. We will be fine, especially when everyone is healthy. The problem is they caught us in the middle of a cold steak.
    2 points
  35. Lol...hard to complain about the outcome there, but still an insane decision to me.
    2 points
  36. Oh look, Marshall in another high leverage situation. Tony needs to be fired ASAP.
    2 points
  37. Don’t be so negative. Engel has worked real hard on his hitting
    2 points
  38. Not with the five bigger name 3B piled up in front of him. Urshela (thankfully not with CLE any longer), Chapman, Jose Ramirez, Donaldson, Bregman, etc, Certainly not with just three homers at a traditional power spot.
    2 points
  39. I sat down today knowing things could take a turn quickly, plus I've got a million things on the to-do list. After that 1st inning...seemed like a good idea to start tackling them.
    2 points
  40. At this point, may as well try it. He’ll be back. I’m in full support of finding a way to get him off mlb roster for 3 weeks at some point. He’s not hitting at all right now, so seems like a good time.
    2 points
  41. You must have a sadly pathetic life then to waste all your free time policing a forum you hate
    2 points
  42. Because we think an outfield containing Billy Hamilton and Jake Lamb is bad and don't expect Engel to be a savior?
    2 points
  43. What do y’all expect until Engel gets back. Jesus bunch of babies
    2 points
  44. 1st bold: Tony might not have "started it it" as you so pointed out like a 3 year old, but he was the gas can to the flame. If he let's this go publicly, no one ever talks about it again. But he had to make an example of him, multiple times in public, so here we are. Tony as a manager of over 5000 games absolutely knows what happens when you talk to the press. In fact one could easily argue he wanted this to happen. 2nd bold, great hint at wanting to see violence done at someone with cerebral palsy. Apparently ageism is bad, but handicapped guys getting theirs for having an opinion contra to the great TLR is cool. 3rd bold. Every player you mentioned was old and white. Did you even notice that? 4th bold. What do gold chains have to do with sportsmanship and respect for unwritten rules? What do they have to do about anything in the game? Why is this so important to you? Of all of the recent instances of actual bad sportsmanship that we have seen recently why is this and gold chains the two this seems to bother you the most, and why does it seem to be broader Latin player tropes which keep creeping into your posts instead of actual material matters? Why is it such a poor example to kids to wear gold chains?
    2 points
  45. And Canseco. Old school managers like LaRussa, Showalter, Scioscia, etc., are a dying breed in baseball especially. You can get away with that Belichick or Saban stuff in football, as long as you win. Basketball, the same transformation is happening. Players don’t want the coach from the movie Hoosiers (Norman Dale) or Bobby Knight. They want someone who is fun to play for, understands the modern athlete and lets them be themselves. In that sense, Renteria was more than adequate. The Carlton Fisks and Madison Bumgarners are disappearing...replaced by another generation with more forward thinking, incorporating analytics, fitness/nutrition and sports psychologist. Just like teachers can’t use the same lessons on the projector from the 1980’s with today’s kids that are much more visual and have lesser attention spans...if you can’t compromise and meet them halfway, to be willing to change and adapt your style or approach, you’re dead. Players will tune you out...and old school punishments rather than incentives/rewards will be met with increasing resistance across the clubhouse until you lose the team entirely.
    2 points
  46. Taking steroids and cheating is fine as long as you don’t swing 3-0. Young players juicing to be the next McGwire is fine, as long as they don’t wear gold chains. How is this buffoon still posting here?
    2 points
  47. He didn't start anything. Yermin did and those who dislike/hate LaRussa have prolonged it ad nauseum. Plenty of ageism mixed in with outrageous accusations that Tony is suffering from Dementia. Nice. Jason Benetti continues to rub salt into the wound and continues his off handed and often unjustified criticisms of LaRussa. He may want to check to see how that kind of schtick worked out for Harry Carey after Reinsdorf purchased the White Sox. Maybe Benetti should bring his opinion about LaRussa as Manger into the open instead of playing games with it. Unwritten rules may be different elsewhere around the league but for the White Sox, Tony has made it clear that players have to obey take signs and directions from their Manager. Tony sets the rules for the players as long as he is Manager and has the support of the Owner. He does. End of discussion. Mercedes will obey signs and directions and if he shows up late for another game, there will be additional fines or punishment. I know Ronnie Kittle as I am sure some of you do. As a rookie in '83, he would never have even considered disobeying a sign and showboating. Ask him if you want to verify that. And ask Fisk or Hawk while you are at it. I bet they would agree with Ron. Oh well maybe way back in '83, that was old school - follow directions from your Manager, show up for games on time. keep the gold necklaces inside your jersey, and maintain some degree of humility , especially as a rookie. Pro athlete should set an example for young kids who play the game. Sportsmanship isn't a rule, but it has been a thing for a few thousand years.
    2 points
  48. Oh, jeez. First off, what question, exactly? That the Sox are the 5th best team in the AL? Not sure what that really even means. Second, you merely said things were "bad takes." You didn't explain why they are bad. As people tend to. If I'm anywhere near in the vicinity of things you want explained (you didn't quite clarify)... The Sox have great starting pitching but that alone does not win championships anymore, they play great against sub .500 teams but so far we have no idea if they can even beat any actual good teams as they have yet to do so, our bullpen as it turns out is overall ass right now, etc. Is that enough to answer whatever it is you are even asking? Saying the Sox are "*insert number here* best team in the AL" ultimately doesn't mean anything unless they can beat actual top talent and you know it. If I'm not satisfying your inquisitivity then please clarify what info you are actually seeking instead of your usual childish, condescending shtick. Not that I believe you are actually looking to be enlightened on anything. Maybe try civilly asking for an inquiry rather than always act snide? Would that hurt you?
    2 points
This leaderboard is set to Chicago/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...