Vulture

Don’t lose hope! You’ll meet the right guy eventually

It wouldn’t be the first time TLR was associated with winning ugly

They’ve already been giving him extra rest. He’s only pitched on four days rest three times. Averaged almost six days of rest through first ten starts. I’d imagine they do the similar the rest of the way and he ends up at about 158 innings

He has horrible numbers no matter how far you go back.

That is one hell of a beard though

Why aren’t you asking that to the guy who acknowledges that the plantaris tendon is attached to the heel yet claims the plantaris muscle has nothing to do with foot movement? It makes no sense. It’s literally impossible, like attaching a rubber band to a lever then claiming the lever has no effect on the rubber band or vice versa. When the foot moves, the heel moves. When they heel moves the attached tendon follows. The muscle must as a result expand or contract otherwise it would be ripped from the heel. I’m not the one making this preposterous claim that a muscle attached to the heel, a well known part of the foot, somehow defies these basic facts. Also I don’t think you know what serious question means. A serious question would relate to one of the numerous arguments I’ve made. This supposed “question” is just more fallacious nonsense

Fine, I post a definition from anatomy we’re talking cadavers then. Tell me why this source and all the others that state the complete opposite are incorrect and another of your unsupported claims is correct again. Physiology like anatomy also incorrect and ptac correct again? https://www.physio-pedia.com/Popliteus_Muscle “ It is the only muscle in the posterior compartment of the lower leg which is mono-articular and does not influence the ankle joint” let’s see mono-articular vs. “controlling the function of the entire lower leg” complete opposites there. Gee I wonder who is incorrect here some guy posting on a board or a nonprofit organization dedicated to physiotherapy with thousands of members. Being “basic” and all I’d think even physiopedia would be a sufficient source. If not maybe you provide one for once. As for plantaris: “medial and superior to the lateral head of the gastrocnemius muscle” now I know I’m a big dummy who posts pictures but I thought superior meant situated above. As in situated at a vertically higher point on the body. Correct me if I’m wrong here. Actually don’t. I looked it up to be sure. That is what it means “Assessment Palpation of the muscle belly is possible” Hmm. Looks like we’ve found another invalid source. It disagrees with ptac after all. “It has been considered to be an organ of proprioceptive function for the larger, more powerful plantar flexors, as it contains a high density of muscle spindles” that does sound like “no function at all” I guess I stand corrected

Once again both of these cannot be true.

Well once again you are demonstrating a lack of it then, considering you keep doing so with irrelevant horse shit

You don’t actually realize the utterly fallacial nature of this post, do you? I mean besides the clearly false claim that the plantaris has no use or activity, a statement once again contradicting your previous comments. Maybe you do, I’m honestly not sure. You didn’t realize we were discussing a cadaver lab? Neither did I considering nothing related to it was ever mentioned by anyone

No shit I figured that out after your first post. If rational thinking isn’t your forte maybe just stay out of it

Hey man i like tool too. but let’s look at facts here. Ptac claims I must be confusing flexing of the poptileus for flexing of the plantaris when curling toes, when the poptileus is the ONE muscle in the vicinity that has definitively no effect on foot function. That is nonsensical and you can verify that yourself easily. Or continue to derp around I don’t give a fuck

Lmao. Do you even listen to yourself. If that’s the definition then I will say any further interaction between us is plantaris. And this time I’m serious

How are unfactual statements supposed to be helpful? I’ve already been educated on the subject so if you tell me something false such as the poptileus muscle might be above the knee joint I’m not just going to dumbly agree. Then when you suggest I might be confusing that for the plantaris muscle when curling toes, when I already know the poptileus muscle doesn’t have anything to do with foot movement, let alone the toes, after you just told me that which I know does in fact doesn’t, it makes me suspect you’re either pulling my leg or don’t know as much as your letting on and expect me to bend over to your nonsense none the less for some bizarre reason. Particularly when I can verify it with third party info. That isn’t how critical thinking works. I mean think about it. I go to therapy for plantar fasciitis. Part of my therapy involves a therapist palpating the plantaris and here you are telling me it can’t be done and I must be confusing it with something else. Now why would my therapist work on something that has nothing to do with it. Just not logical. Plantaris literally means related to the sole of the foot

Why would I do that it’s already known

And like I told you and as the video I posted illustrates it emerges above the knee joint and is in fact palpable. The way you can pick it out is by curling and uncurling the toes. When curling the toes the other muscles are flaccid so you can easily tell the difference. Hope this helps. Have a good night

you said “it’s a muscle not a tendon above the knee” which I found odd because I never claimed it was a tendon above the knee

That’s why I described it repeatedly and provided illustrations

Whatever homie

No facts? You mean like how it’s not a fact there is a plantaris tendon. How can there now be no plantaris tendon when a couple pages ago you were telling me to which bone it is attached? One of these statements MUST be false. There is no other option. you want me to consider there are no facts when you have just been telling me it’s a fact that the plantaris muscle can’t be palpated. If that’s not a factual statement what is it. Let’s a factual statement that isn’t a fact. Let’s see where have i seen this definition before. Oh yeah under bullshit

So a thousand different interpretations all locate it below the knee. Find something that supports that it is above the knee then. What a bunch of nonsense . You guys go ahead and take whatever this guy as gospel when in this thread alone there numerous false claims. Ludicrous

Omg I know I said I wouldn’t respond again but now you’re claiming there isn’t even a plantaris tendon at all???? Wow. This unbelievable man. Whatever carry on

Why not just post derp, guy posted pictures to illustrate actual facts. How about thinking for yourself for once

Yes let’s celebrate the abandonment of reason and just go along with the perceived authority statements even when they’re statements clearly demonstrated to be false. The hallmark of critical thinking

The reason I posted that image was to disprove your false claim the pop. muscle is located above the joint. so now your claim is you made that false claim to give me the benefit of the doubt. Jesus man that is ludicrous. I just won’t respond to your posts anymore