Jump to content

bmags

Admin
  • Posts

    60,715
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    145

Posts posted by bmags

  1. I once again look at the state of our players, and have to go back to the claims that Chris Getz had Dylan Cease and made him open to trade and said "Dang, we can't just take the best players we can get, we need as much pitching as possible. Our hitters are solid. We just need more pitching"

    • Like 1
  2. 18 hours ago, Chisoxfn said:

    Sucks - hope it heals ok with no long term effects. That is a rough rehab - presuming he has to lay flat for like 20+ hours of the day for a while.  

    yikes, didn't realize. Thought you just had to deal with constant flurries and couldn't lift heavy objects. That would suck.

  3. 3 minutes ago, nrockway said:

    I basically started posting on this forum because I gave up on the Bulls for the reason the other poster mentioned (and basically the reasons why people in this thread are giving up on the Sox). That team is going to treadmill until 2030 because there's no path for improvement and their idiot GM keeps compounding his bad mistakes. Trading lottery picks for bad, overpaid veterans, trading an all-star starter who you have team control of for a guy who sits on the bench for a year then doesn't get re-signed. Drafting a non-NBA player with the 4th overall pick, declaring him the franchise savior, then watching him flounder for years because the GM can't admit he screwed up. They will re-sign Pat this offseason and cement the Bulls as a 39-43 team for the rest of my life. Just good enough to make the BS play-in and not tank ticket sales, not good enough to actually win anything.

    The Bulls may be "better" than the White Sox in relation to their respective leagues, but I actually think the Bulls are in a sorrier state. I could reasonably expect the White Sox to have a good team in 2026, I see no path for the Bulls unless they get really lucky in the draft (that is, if they haven't already traded all their future draft picks away).

    They aren't in a sorrier state. 

     

     

    • Like 2
  4. 49 minutes ago, TaylorStSox said:

    I don't think the players or Getz "deserve" to be embarrassed. Getz is taking over a team that refuses to spend money and it's coming off a failed rebuild where nearly all the assets lost their value on the trade market. He has very little to work with.

    Even Grifol is being paid to be a punching bag while knowing this is his only shot at being an MLB manager. 

    I think he deserves ridicule for shopping in the DeJong/Pillar/Moustakas/Maldonado buckets instead of taking the opportunity to live in the Rule 5/waiver world where we could get players of similar value but the potential to have long term control.

    This year was going to be this year. It was going to be bad. But the Rangers found Adonis Garcia on waivers. The Orioles found Santander in rule 5. I dug into rule 5 this year, it wasn't a good one, but nonetheless we were so worried about pitching and we are getting shut out every game.

    Instead we wasted a bunch of roster spots on guy slike lopez/shewmake that put a ton of pressure on our lower level guys to stick and have zero room to breathe. SO we send out Jose Rodriguez.

    • Like 2
  5. 29 minutes ago, chetkincaid said:

    If a team is going to be bad, then be good at being bad. I don’t want a middle of the road team like the Bulls because that still gives people hope. “All we need is a left handed slugger named Adam and we are golden!”. Nah I want them to be historically bad and lose 120+ games. That way everyone knows that it will take a complete tear down and rebuild to win again. 

    I'd rather have the bulls. 

    • Like 1
  6. I actually don't even know. With the bulls it felt like "ok, they embarrass themselves, we can shame them into turning this group over". It was a monkey paw, but it did feel attainable.

    With Getz getting the job with a smarmy press conference by JR, there just isn't going to be a way to shame it this quickly. So I hope that, instead, this is just the remnants of how bad it was from a draft and develop standpoint under Hahn. ANd it was. People talk about the draft, but this is also what it looks like when you punt entire International classes for Colas and Yolbert and Cespedes.

    But there are some signs of life in the recent draft classes, at least. Paddy has at least appeared to be less lazy, but still too lazy for my liking. 

    But this amount of shutouts, this level of horrid play. I don't think it's good for anything. Certainly when you don't have a Luhnow or someone overseeing the show.

    • Like 2
  7. On 11/17/2023 at 7:11 AM, bmags said:

    I’m not expecting a lot for bummer, but nearly all these guys are out of time. Their pedigrees mean as much as Hahn trading for former top 100 guys.

    If Shewmake struggles in AAA as a 26 year old, he has no value.

    Schuster, also 25, I’ll say this. His slider maybe means he can turn into a bullpen piece with control.

    But I feel like over the years we’ve taken on X number of former Atlanta top prospect pitchers and they’ve never been wrong that a guy is washed.

    I mean a handful of the Aball pitchers I’d like more from a profile perspective.

    Id non tender Lopez. He’s not gonna get $4 million.

    Hell yess thank you past me. Granted - there is no joy in this white sox world, but a good post. A good post.

    • Like 3
  8. 1 hour ago, southsider2k5 said:

    Once Lavine went out, things got a lot better.  I think part of the problem was the team didn't make any moves, which alienated everyone who knew the team had zero chemistry and needed a big change.

    Yeah, I mean as far as the ambitions and management of the bulls, they should be embarrassed as their claim was continuity would improve this unit.

    But as far as getting to watch basketball, the play of coby/caruso/demar/ayo was actually a respite from the rest of what I could see sports wise

  9. 12 hours ago, Chisoxfn said:

    Jerry has to be happy - I think Bulls officially clinched a home play-in game.  Play In money here JR comes 

    I know popular opinion is bulls should be embarrassed and yes they should etc etc no mans land etc etc.

    But considering how bad sports were, since December Bulls have been a good watch. I can't have too many white sox at once.

  10. Hoge and Jahns did a bit with Kevin Fishbain where they argued for WR, Pass Rush or OT at nine. 

    To discredit WR, they brought up how few of the top ten paid WRs were first rounders (which will change a lot next year) but also how few were super bowl winners.

    I really can't stand that argument. So anyway I put this together below:

    Top Ten Paid QBs and Super bowls

    total 2
    Top Ten Paid RBs and Super Bowls
    total 0
    Top Ten Paid WRs and Super BOwls
    total 2
    Top Ten Paid TEs and Super Bowls
    total 1
    Top Ten Paid LTs and Super Bowls
    total 1
    Top Ten Paid RTs and Super Bowls
    total 2
    Top Ten Paid Gs and Super Bowls
    total 0
    Top Ten Paid Cs and Super Bowls
    total 2
    Top Ten Paid DEs and Super Bowls
    total 0
    Top Ten Paid DTs and Super Bowls
    total 2
    Top Ten Paid OLBs and Super Bowls
    total 1
    Top Ten Paid MLBs and Super Bowls
    total 2
    Top Ten Paid CBs and Super Bowls
    total 3
    Top Ten Paid S and Super Bowls
    total 1
    Top Ten Paid K and Super Bowls
    total 2
     
    There's a lot of problems with this. For one, KC has won 3 of the last 5 super bowls. The avg age in the league isn't that old, and to be highest paid you'll need to be on second contract. Also, if you were highly paid 3-4 years ago, likelihood is you may be cut now or are no longer highest paid.
     
    But all that aside...WR had more super bowl winners than Edge and LT!!!!! 
    • Like 1
  11. 15 minutes ago, Tony said:

    We can talk about all the details until we're blue in the face...if Caleb is great, the Bears will be in the Super Bowl conversation for the next 5 years. If he's a bust, none of the other roster moves will make that much of a difference. 

     

    biggest question to me is how unique is MHJ as a prospect vs just "very good receiver". If you think you'd never get this good a shot at a player like that within a few spots, you do it. If it's just "we like the receivers this draft and want to add one this year", It hink you keep next years picks because 2nd round receivers have been the gold mine recently.

  12. 2 hours ago, Kyyle23 said:

    Lots of radio noise about the bears moving up to draft Harrison, I just can’t see it happening right now given their current and upcoming draft cache.  Would be pretty amazing to exit day 1 with those two though.  Honestly won’t be mad if it’s Nabers or Ozunze either 

    I don't know what to think. But last year, at least the week before, the idea of them getting Wright really started to crystallize. Maybe they do value these receivers as specifically special outside normal top ten ranges and go get them. But I would be surprised and it would have to fall just right as a team like the cards could trade back and trade up pretty easily to beat the bears offers.

  13. 1 minute ago, DirtySox said:

    I haven't watched much Mason Adams. But he's kind of a sleeper right? The 2023 numbers look very solid.

    I think biggest issue is we struggled to get reports on his stuff to judge

  14. 2 minutes ago, DirtySox said:

    I'd love for him to make Soxtalk look like asshats. (Myself included) Not that it's very difficult.

    To be fair I think we thought he’d rake in A and A+ before stalling. I didn’t expect him to be so abysmal last year. 
     

    hope he good

×
×
  • Create New...