Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


ptatc last won the day on June 13 2020

ptatc had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

2,099 Hall of Famer

About ptatc

  • Rank
    Minor League Manager
  • Birthday 07/24/1967

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    sec 162 row 1

Previous Fields

  • Favorite Sox Minor League Affiliate
    Birmingham Barons (AA)

Recent Profile Visitors

3,748 profile views
  1. ptatc

    2021 NFL Season Thread

    No kidding. He's lucky it was a straight hyperextension. While that can cause injuries, the worst knee injuries have a rotational component to them.
  2. I would blame him too. My point was it is not just his decision alone as implied by the post that he the dinosaur is the reason.
  3. Pioneer probably was a poor choice of words. Early adopter? Early user?
  4. Are the advanced scouts the same? Are the people in the analytics department the same? These decisions aren't made by one person without input from others.
  5. I'm sure he had input. Just as I'm sure the other departments did too. I guess my comment should have been it's not LaRussa alone that made these decisions so to assume the dinosaur won't allow the shifts is erroneous.
  6. I doubt any of this was determined by LaRussa. That's the advanced scouting and analytics department. Before you say he doesn't listen to any of that, he was one of the pioneers of it in St. Louis.
  7. ptatc

    Offseason Thread

    I agree. I think they should focus on a high OBP, good fielder type. They have plenty of power from others. Someone to hit at the bottom of the order and get back to anderson.
  8. ptatc

    Offseason Thread

    Greater frequency with less time and stress per outing. Tissue heals better with lower loads with greater frequency ie, people go to PT 3x/week with low loads.
  9. ptatc

    Offseason Thread

    Or. The injury changed their plan and they were worried about stressing the hamstring to much to avoid a Engel scenario. They waited until September 15th because they wanted more innings for an extended playoff run, which unfortunately didn't happen but they were planning on having him ready for it.
  10. ptatc

    Offseason Thread

    I disagree. The plan wasn't the mistake. I don't think predicting an injury to take away innings is a reasonable plan to start the year.
  11. ptatc

    Offseason Thread

    Dang, good post. I agree.
  12. ptatc

    Offseason Thread

    Possible. however, without knowing everything that was going on I wouldn't necessarily jump to that conclusion. with his injury history that may be the best plan of care.
  13. ptatc

    Offseason Thread

    I would agree that the management after the injury was suspect. There seems to have been more going on to limit his innings that much after it. This is the problem with saying it was all mismanaged, we don't know everything that was going on. however, the overall plan from the beginning of the year as you were quoting was still a good plan derailed by the injury. This is why I keep pointing to the inury caused the issue not the mismangement of the plan for the year
  14. ptatc

    Offseason Thread

    That's fine. I happen to think that an injury is a reason to not pitch. It looks like you disagree that an injury is a good reason to not pitch or at least they should have predicted the injury and had him pitch more earlier in the year. I also changed my view of him being able to be a full time starter next year based on said injury. Unless you can say that you could predict the injury thus they should have had him pitch more earlier in the year, I don't see how it was mismanaged. He was on track to get a good number of innings in for the year.
  15. ptatc

    Offseason Thread

    Right if they planned on him being a full time starter. To get him close to those innings, he would have not been able to be injured and then been used in the playoffs to get close to those innings. As it stands, he didn't get to those innings and probably shouldn't be a full time starter. He should be a starter because his innings will need to be in the 150-160 range but will need some skipped starts or mange those innings somehow. The expectations for the 100 innings give or take changed with the injury. A based the workload on being a fulltime not skipping any starts, regular rotation starter. That obviously shouldn't happen, in my opinion due to the injury risk next year. Now if they are doing simulated games right now to increase those innings, it could change.