timotime

whoa, im sorry if i came off that way. im not trying to make palis victims at all. i realize that they, not israel are the ones using the suicide bombs and all that. i was only pointing out that israel hates palestinians too (both sides have good reasons at this point to hate each other, i think). sorry if i came off the wrong way.

i personally dislike dean. hes too over the top, especially when he says things about wanting failure in iraq, etc. but then again, im more conservative than liberal. i want to know what the dems on soxtalk actually think of dean. on a side note, here's a link to the dean scream: http://www.marriedadults.com/howarddeanscream.php

i know, saddam hasnt wiped out kurds in the north or anything? that testimony that was in the news from multiple people who had family members killed in front of them? it was all lies and it was all false. no evidence whatsoever!

we are setting up a democracy- it has been set up. we should let the iraqi gov't do whatever it wants now. we arent torturing saddam, the iraqi government is, and they should, too, because that piece of s*** deserves it. liberals are always complaining about us running that country when the iraqis should be, like it is a puppet gov't. and now you want us to step into this trial? you cant have it both ways, man, make a choice. dont b**** unless you have a solution. let me go out on a limb- you're solution has three phases: 1. cut 2. run 3. place tail between legs for all the world to see

very good point.

good point.

oops. s***, i meant to include that. that was a pirro-esque gaff! haha, damn you Obama! regardless, claiming that she'll kill in the midwest, i cant see it happening. a lot can obviously change in more than two years in the politico game, but thats my two cents.

pirro never stood a chance. she had so many gaffs it was unbelievable. it's pretty much hopeless for the GOP in NY state.

once again, what you are saying is completely contrary to what recent history has proven. Hillary would kill in the midwest?? if by kill, you mean win wisconson and MI, and lose all other midwest states, then yes, she will kill in the midwest. OH has a lot of electoral votes, as the last election proved (the whole claim about voter fraud was sore losers, and i dont blame them, but OH is a red state). and the midwest piles up votes. SOURCE??? you have absolutely no grounds to claim that hillary, or any democrat, will sweep out the midwest. I dont have one for what i say either, but the last election backs me up. you tell me when the last time a democrat cleaned up in the midwest. probably during the vietnam war is my guess.

some valid points you have there. however, the israelis are not as passive and rosy as you make them seem. both sides have a deep hatred for each other. the only difference is that israel has a democratic society that is so sick of the violence they are willing to do just about anything to stop it, as opposed to the palestinians, who are dirt poor and have nothing to lose and under no circumstances will ever want peace (especially when we have bastards like the current iranian president around goading palestine on). what can you do? i say, bottom line, there is no solution. the conflict will never end. sad but true, and i would love someone to prove me wrong.

uh, what republicans do you speak of? SOURCE??? thats what i thought. also, are you seriously calling an election in '08 right now? that's rediculous, no matter which side you are on- thats more than two years from now. i will guarentee that damn near everything is going to REALLY change by the time of the next presidential election. texsox said it best. if the election were tomorrow, mccain, being a soft republican, would beat anyone else, hands down. if you think that kerry got slammed with the flip-flop (justly deserved, by the way), you aint seen nothing yet for hillary. hillary might win in NY, and even the northeast, but she has got LOTS of work to do in the midwest to win more than one state (MI), and she doesnt stand a chance in the sunbelt (counting FL). she'll get CA, OR, and WA (WA maybe), but shes going to have a damn hard time with the other mountain region states as well. conversely, mccain is from the west, and is widely liked there. he's a war vet who was tortured in the hanoi hilton, which will get him tons of votes over hillary, who was dyking it out at welsely at the time and calling vietnam vets baby-killers. mccain stands a decent chance of grabbing some coveted west coast states (but not CA), and he also has a good chance of grabbing some NE states that lean a little to the right, such as PA.

about f***ing time. more than that, we need to put in textbooks how jimmy carter was the worst president in this history of this country. what did carter do for us besides a gas shortage and a f***ing-up of a hostage rescue? all we need is another chump in office like him- then the country can collectively grease up and bend over and prepare to get f***ed.

magic johnson is no longer HIV positive...does anyone here know of that? if you can afford it, you can beat it. problem is, most people with AIDS are junkies and/or degenerates (there are, of course, exceptions) who cant afford the treatment Magic could. such is life. ce la vie.

if you are addicted, get some help, see a doctor. please dont even try to say its hard to get help for alcohalism, because its easy. you could even get hypnotized- i personally know two people that worked for. dont complain unless you are willing to help yourself. it's their house, so they can keep whatever they want in the fridge. you have to be willing to help yourself if you want to be helped.

i cant understand why garland wants to get the hell out of chicago so badly. whatever, lets get whatever we can for him.