Jump to content

Disco72

Members
  • Content count

    1,215
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Disco72

  1. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    Bears could easily have had a couple more INTs tonight.
  2. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    Come on Bears, you need the TD here.
  3. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    Now THAT'S a questionnable call!
  4. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    QUOTE (fathom @ Nov 7, 2011 -> 11:06 PM) 3rd and one and you try a very difficult pass? Awful playcalling I hate that playcall. You've been run blocking well all day, so get the yard and keep driving.
  5. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    It's not just the drops; it's the drops on the big plays. At least Bennett can catch.
  6. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    It's really hard to hate on Forte...but seriously? again?
  7. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    Bears playing delightfully physical on defense. They gotta be careful for the personal fouls in the 2nd half.
  8. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    Maclin looked like he should have been wearing white on that play.
  9. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    Some pretty seriously bad football being played here. Bears better take advantage.
  10. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    BEARS BALL! Gotta get a TD here.
  11. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    Yep. Some rough throws there by Cutler.
  12. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    Two catchable uncaught balls and a fumble... great job with less than 2 minutes in the half.
  13. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Nov 7, 2011 -> 09:48 PM) i'm glad I overspent on Vick in my fantasy league. f***ing Matthew Berry I hope I'm wrong, but I think the Bears need 24 points to win tonight. The offense needs to stay on the field so the defense can be high energy when out there.
  14. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    The Bears are really getting to Vick tonight. ... and Peppers back in!
  15. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    ...and there's bad Martz.
  16. Disco72

    Official 2011-2012 NFL Thread

    Welcome back Earl Bennett!
  17. Disco72

    Job Hunt Thread

    QUOTE (bigruss22 @ Nov 1, 2011 -> 12:49 AM) So Ive been talking a bit about with my manager about my start time for once I graduate, so that we can both plan things out. I want to, and he's encouraging heavily, for me to pursue my MBA part time as soon as I can, like within a year of undergrad graduation to be enrolled. That said, has anyone here taken the GMAT? How many study hours do I need to plan on? Good resources to buy? And while we are on the subject, what opinions do you guys ahve about the B-schools in Chicago? Obviously Kellogg and Booth are top in the country, but for part time (and a more reasonable expectation) I've heard decent/good things about Depaul/Loyola/UIC. They also cost less than half of Kellogg (I could afford the extra cost, but for going within a year out of undergrad that means I would be living at home for awhile ). I agree with bmags on going back that early...but if the company is pushing for it, I guess I'd consider it. Maybe I missed it, but will the company help pay at all? GMAT isn't too bad. Take a lot of practice tests and work on your weaknesses. IMO, the hierarchy of the MBAs in Chicago is Chicago/Northwestern, then DePaul/UIC, then Loyola. (Although I admit that I haven't really looked at this in awhile, and I think UIC has ramped up their program) It really depends on your career path and who is paying. Who wouldn't like to have an MBA from Chicago or Northwestern? I got into U of Chicago and DePaul and choose DePaul since it was more flexible and less expensive. DePaul's part time MBA has traditionally been rated pretty high, but I admit I haven't looked at the rankings in awhile. All in all, I was extremely pleased with my education at DePaul as well as the chance to network (I went back to change to a different area/industry).
  18. If anyone is watching the Tennessee game, Rodgers just had one of the worst drops you'll see. A TD pass right through his hands....you just have a feeling the game is going to turn on that.
  19. Disco72

    2011 TV Thread

    QUOTE (bigruss22 @ Oct 19, 2011 -> 03:37 AM) WTF Juice, you f***ing dumbass. Did anyone hear the branch snap too? There was some kind of sound. I also wondered if it was the branch snapping.
  20. QUOTE (dasox24 @ Sep 17, 2011 -> 10:59 AM) Boom! Nice spotlight / analysis on Bray by Urban Meyer and Todd McShay on College Gameday a few minutes ago.
  21. QUOTE (Capn12 @ Sep 11, 2011 -> 03:47 PM) Yep, but now a real test vs a real opponent comes. Tennessee vs Florida at Florida should be a game to watch this week. I'm looking forward to that, and Auburn at Clemson, before the Oklahoma-FSU game. Yeah, it's always risky getting too excited about wins over sub-par opponents. Next week should be a really fun day of college football.
  22. QUOTE (dasox24 @ Sep 10, 2011 -> 08:08 PM) Ooh boy, Tennessee's offense looked unstoppable today... If we play like this next week against Florida, we'll win. UT looked really good yesterday. The defense adjusted in the 2nd quarter, Dooley had a good game plan, and I'm becoming a bigger Bray fan every week. The offense looked so much better last year when he started, and he was tossing some great passes yesterday.
  23. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 30, 2011 -> 02:49 PM) Little known fact is that they have his OPS on the wall as well. The problem is that it was so small, no one can see it. nicely done!
  24. Disco72

    Catch All Anything Thread

    QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Aug 29, 2011 -> 03:29 PM) No, see if it happens again. If it's a new roommate, the dog likely kept the others up, too. Saying something after it happened only once seems sort of douche-y. I'm sure others will disagree profusely, but it might just be a one-time mistake. Now that I'm not as pissed off about it, that's what we're going to do. We don't like the neighbors involved, but that's no reason for us to be the jerks.
×