Jump to content

brett05

Members
  • Posts

    570
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by brett05

  1. 18 hours ago, greg775 said:

    I have a relative whose net worth is close to $1 million after inheriting money after both parents' deaths. She has no dependents and her husband is dead. She is close to retirement age.

    Question: What do she do with that kind of money when she'll need to start spending some of it during retirement years? She currently is working. Is 900,000 to 1 mill enough to live on combined with social security payments that can start whenever she wishes between 62 and 65? I know nothing about money so thought I'd ask you kind folks.

    This really depends on her ongoing expenses.

  2. The ballpark is 281 feet (86 m) to left field, 314 feet (96 m) to center and 262 feet (80 m) to right field. With additional temporary bleachers, the venue held nearly 6,000 spectators for the 2013 Team of Dreams celebrity ball game.

     

    They need dimensions and seats.  Gotta be a day game for lighting.  Going to need netting to protect the fans from fouls. 

     

    No doubt it can all get done, just a lot of work.

    But this would be a national game with an up and coming White Sox team.

     

    I really like the idea.

    Given how few seats there are, I'd not be shocked if pricing started at $100+ a ticket.

  3. 20 hours ago, illinilaw08 said:

    I also think it's important to note that he intentionally excluded gun deaths by suicide on the other side of the equation.  From Harvard - attempted suicide by gun is effective 82.5% of the time.  Drugs and cutting are each effective less than 2% of the time.  I will shout from the rooftops about how that stat matters any time someone seeks to exclude those deaths...

    https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/means-matter/means-matter/case-fatality/

    Shout all you want, the life that is jeopardized is only the suicidal.  Yes you eliminate them from the talk.

  4. On 11/14/2018 at 8:38 AM, NorthSideSox72 said:

    This is untrue because it is non-provable. You are assuming that all incidents involving a gun used in self defense saved a life. Clearly that won't be true - it will be some portion of it. And the part that is non-provable is that there is no way to know which ones. 80%? 10%? 50%? One would literally have to study each incident in detail, and even then still make assumptions. It isn't possible.

    The only thing we can say with confidence is that it is a fraction of what you re using here as a measure, that "DGU".

     

    I never said provable.

    I used a stat from the government, a supposedly unbiased source.

    The only thing we can say with confidence is that there are lives saved, how many is debatable, it could be thousands it could be tens of millions

  5. 21 hours ago, Balta1701 said:

    Those estimates run into the same problem of people overestimating things, the numbers that you give are similar to the fraction of Americans who say they were abducted by aliens. The Rand corp did a summary of the available  data on this a few years ago, but because the government is blocked from collecting this data by the gun industry, there is never good data on it, and a reasonable person would probably note that my side would be happy to collect more data and the other side is not.

     

    I agree, but again if you take the low number more lives are saved than lost by a multitude margin.

×
×
  • Create New...