Jump to content

FT35

Members
  • Posts

    703
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by FT35

  1. On 4/15/2024 at 9:56 AM, Highland said:

    Things are really bad when the only speculation is how awful the team will be. This is not a MLB roster.

    Best part of the Sox not being able to hit baseballs is we don’t have to watch much of the super dumb HR celebrations that teams do to desperately try to appeal to fans.  Such a strange time for MLB—all those acts are ultra awkward.  I don’t mind genuine emotion after a big moment & I understand a handful of people might find the grossly immature HR side shows amusing—for me it got old fast and the game is becoming unwatchable.  I watch these same guys slobber all over each other after a HR skit then proceed to ineptly fiddle fart around defensively the following inning like a bunch of amateurs.  Let’s have fun in a way that keeps focus.  
     

    The moment this team accidentally connects on a long ball and tries some goofy adolescent mosh pit ritual in the dugout that’s only funny to them (as if HR’s are a regular thing)…I’m out.  

  2. 45 minutes ago, GreatScott82 said:

    Let’s not forget Pedro was the manager of last years circus 🎪 He was the man in charge of that locker room of dysfunction. Because Jerry wanted to save a few pennies, he gets to stay in charge this season? WOW. That’s dogcrap. Getz has already saved Jerry millions with his roster destruction. Fire his ass and let’s move forward. 

    I think it will ultimately hurt Getz if he doesn’t.  By not firing him, he’s already communicating to the organization that results don’t matter.  Not just losing, but performing poorly is “OK” now “in the big picture” way.  That is why their culture has been in the tank for so long.  Hahn and Williams justified SO MUCH LOSING, going through repeated tanks and rebuilds.  
     

    Justifying losing for any reason—whether it’s to tank or save money, whatever it may be, is difficult to get back.  The person who justifies it is usually the person who has to leave before winning matters to everyone again.  To think a team conditioned to justify losing for someone for so long will just all of a sudden be able to win for that same person is nonsense. 

    • Fire 1
  3. 7 hours ago, ChiliIrishHammock24 said:

    For those freaking out about Thorpe, a Padres fan said their their stadium gun has been off by 4-5 MPH this spring. That would make Thorpe's reported 88-89 MPH fast yesterday actually like 92-94. That's a lot more in like with what he's been.

    Also another note on Thorpe, Fangraphs actually things Thorpe will be better then Cease in 2024 given a similar amount of IP. 

    I don't think this trade was a fleecing, but I think it was realistic and fair. Of course we loved to dream on fleecing one of these clubs but the closer we got to Opening Day, the more risk involved in holding Cease until July. I'm satisfied with this move even if they decided to diversify their risk across 3 good prospects vs just getting 1 headliner and a couple of throw ins.

    A multi-BILLION dollar industry and they can’t get a working radar gun for Spring Training?

    • Like 1
  4. 13 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

    Time for the Yankees to nut up and offer us Jones, Hampton, & Vivas or Cashman will risk joining Hahn in the unemployment line next off-season.

    I just also hope this deal doesn’t lower the bar as far as returns are concerned.  “Burnes only returned “x” so we’re not going as high on Cease…”

  5. 1 hour ago, oldsox said:

    Not true.

    Ok good.  It was in this thread that I was instructed to believe that great players are NEVER blocked.  Maybe that just meant great Orioles players are never blocked!  😂. It only happens to the other mortal teams!

  6. 10 minutes ago, WhiteSox2023 said:

    The Dodgers were smart and dealt their older infield prospect with nowhere to play for a promising 19 year old pitcher.

    I was once told that great players were never blocked.  I’m looking forward to seeing the O’s start multiple players at certain positions on any given night.

  7. 52 minutes ago, Y2Jimmy0 said:

    I don’t think those asks are unrealistic. I’m guessing that the issue is the rest of the package. 

    Agreed.  You want a young, cheap, team-controlled TOR starting pitcher with ace potential to step in THIS YEAR?  That’s a big ask—who wouldn’t want that??  Converting some prospects that are stuck behind layers of MLB depth—who have about a 10% chance of becoming as good of an MLB contributor as Cease—is a no brainer.  Deal should have been done in November.  
     

    If the Sox were knocking on the door of a serious contending window—watched a division-rival team land another superstar player and SP depth this offseason, had a young player with major star potential at both left side infield positions and more infield strength in the system, were sitting on a starting pitching staff of 2 quality options and some big question marks a month away from pitchers and catchers reporting…who here wouldn’t be willing to keep Colson Montgomery and move a package led by a guy like Jacob Gonzalez to land a Spencer Strider/Zac Gallen for the next 2 years?

  8. If the Sox were smart—they wouldn’t go after any players from Baltimore and instead try to acquire the guys in charge of drafting and developing Baltimore’s prospects.  That would likely pay off more in the long run.  Give a guy a fish/teach a guy to fish…

  9. 33 minutes ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said:

    Orioles fans won’t like this but I believe Cease’s value right now is comparable to Luis Castillo in July 2022. The Reds landed 3 of the Mariners top 5 prospects (1 was fringe top 10 in mlb, 1 was top 100 in mlb, 1 was fringe top 100 in mlb) and then a lotto prospect. I don’t think Cease will land a top 10 prospect but 2 in the 50-100 range and 2 in the 100-200 range is certainly possible.

    Yeah I mean not to over simplify it—but there are 2 paths to acquiring a TOR SP who can immediately step into your rotation.  You can commit to a 9-figure contract to snag a top FA or you can throw a similar value in prospects at it instead.  Either way—the cost to obtain what Cease is, is very high and there’s no way around that.  It is what it is.

  10. As I look at these dreadful signings, the one thing that keeps playing in my head is Jerry justifying the Getz hire as being the fastest path back to relevancy.  
     

    Fedde, Flexen, Stassi…we have a literal “FFS” class of additions that give us a look into what Jerry considers “relevancy.” 

  11. 9 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

    And this is where you guys and other fan bases have it wrong.

    A consistent theme we have seen is people saying, well just trade Mayo or Basallo because “you have other guys”. It’s like the people who say billionaires should pay a higher percentage of their money for taxes because “they can afford it”.

    Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. 
     

    And the other part to this is that Cease just isn’t good enough for that level of player.  He can be but in 4 of his 5 years or, if you want, 2 of the last 3, he hasn’t been worth it. 
     

    If you “shouldn’t” trade them, how else would you handle great MILB prospects that are blocked at the MLB level for at least the next half-decade?

  12. 34 minutes ago, WestEddy said:

     

    Quite honestly, every team should be willing to do this.  If you can convert guys you hope will someday be good into quality, controllable MLB pitching—you do it.  You can take the chance the unknowns become good or you can guarantee they translate into valuable assets. 

    • Like 1
  13. 1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

    We understand but just because it’s what you want, doesn’t mean it’s going to happen.

    We just went through a rebuild and wanted the same thing.  We all get it. We just don’t care.

    Wait, you know who the Sox are going to get in a few years for the bums we get for Cease now?

    • Haha 1
  14. 6 minutes ago, Snowy Demon said:

    Whatever happened to making a trade that is fair to both side instead of "winning" or "fleece" other team?  This is also something that cannot be determined before some seasons passed most of time. 

    Those kinds of trades typically involve a MLer from a position of surplus for a MLer of a different position of need.  This is definitely not one of those trades.  This is a proven, elite, controllable MLB talent in exchange for guys we hope turn out to be as good as or better than Cease in a couple years.  
     

    Essentially, you’re agreeing to get fleeced for the next couple years by giving up a top talent for nothing that will help you anytime soon.  The hope is the return is worth waiting for.

  15. Non Sox fans don’t understand how important it is for us to fleece someone in a Cease trade.  For teams like us who don’t develop talent, this is our only path to any sort of success.  And we will need to set the market high because we will want top dollar for all these guys we’re about to get for Cease when we burn it all to the ground in a few seasons.  

    • Like 1
  16. 10 hours ago, ptatc said:

    Unfortunately, it is what's needed. 

    Just like any job, peoe get complacent during their employment. 

    Taking someone from good to great, yes!   But making sure someone wants to try?  Then I’d say hire a baby sitter for those guys!  Once they’ve had their milk and a snack, send them out to the field to play major league baseball for Pedro.  Pedro has his own issues, but making sure guys like Eloy feel like being a professional on any given day shouldn’t be one of those worries.  Let another team spend their time and resources figuring out what combination of snacks, games and cartoons it takes to get their players to produce in the major leagues.

    • Haha 1
  17. 7 minutes ago, fathom said:

    It’s just so pathetic they can’t find a manager that brings the best (or even not the worst) out of players

    It shouldn’t take a manager or anyone else to get a professional baseball player being paid millions to give their best. 

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...