Jordan4life_2007 Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 17, 2017 -> 02:10 PM) Simple semantics, no need for you to freak out. I should have put "since" instead of it. My bad. My bad if you just simply used the wrong word. I got the impression you were under some illusion that the White Sox might actually try to compete next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yesterday333 Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 So is the cash all we are getting back or is there still a ptbnl? its not very clear if that is the return or just part of the return. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Aug 17, 2017 -> 09:42 PM) My bad if you just simply used the wrong word. I got the impression you were under some illusion that the White Sox might actually try to compete next year. No this time I simply meant "since" it's a rebuilding year it'd be neat to have Kemp lead off all year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted August 18, 2017 Share Posted August 18, 2017 QUOTE (yesterday333 @ Aug 17, 2017 -> 05:28 PM) So is the cash all we are getting back or is there still a ptbnl? its not very clear if that is the return or just part of the return. I don't think anyone know for sure, but probably safe to assume Astros took on $1M of the ~1.2M remains on Clippards deal and that's it. No PTBNL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 (edited) Pitching well through 4 games with the Astros so far. Wouldn't mind bringing him back on a 1-year deal (maybe 2 years since he's not that old yet and maybe could do better than one) as we need bullpen arms anyway. Edited August 22, 2017 by soxfan2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanne Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Aug 22, 2017 -> 10:43 AM) Pitching well through 4 games with the Astros so far. Wouldn't mind bringing him back on a 1-year deal (maybe 2 years since he's not that old yet and maybe could do better than one) as we need bullpen arms anyway. I just saw that...given up only 1 hit in 4 appearances... but for the love of God...NO THANKS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
credezcrew24 Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Aug 22, 2017 -> 09:43 AM) Pitching well through 4 games with the Astros so far. Wouldn't mind bringing him back on a 1-year deal (maybe 2 years since he's not that old yet and maybe could do better than one) as we need bullpen arms anyway. It seems like exactly the kind of free agent deal the White Sox would look for. A cheap veteran roster spot who must have enjoyed working with Coop that is flippable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenksycat Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 QUOTE (credezcrew24 @ Aug 22, 2017 -> 04:55 PM) It seems like exactly the kind of free agent deal the White Sox would look for. A cheap veteran roster spot who must have enjoyed working with Coop that is flippable. Hoping the 'magic' of Coop fixing Kahnle/Swarzak/Clippard entices more guys to sign 1 year deals this off-season (ignore Holland & Shields) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScootsMcGoots Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 QUOTE (Wanne @ Aug 22, 2017 -> 04:34 PM) I just saw that...given up only 1 hit in 4 appearances... but for the love of God...NO THANKS! Well, in all fairness, for a team that won't be good next year, and with a look at the current arms, only the currently injured Jones is really the only trustworthy one as far as results and experience goes. This pen will be the death of the team next year, right there with the defense, in my opinion. Why not give him a try. Crazier things have happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewokpelts Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 QUOTE (soxtalker999 @ Aug 17, 2017 -> 12:39 PM) I wonder how much leverage the Sox had in the negotiations. Did we ever learn whether Houston claimed him, or if he passed through waivers unclaimed? If the latter, the Sox could negotiate with any team. If the former, the Sox could only negotiate with Houston, and the only alternative to making a deal with them was to keep Clippard for the rest of the season. Also, I imagine that Clippard is far happier to be pitching for Houston than the Sox for the rest of this season. He has a chance at a championship. I would think that would be a good message to send to players that we might sign in the off-season -- if you sign with the Sox, they'll work with you and give you a chance to latch onto a contender in the middle of the season. i think it was implied he cleared waivers. especially considering that the sox ate some money. if he were claimed, the sox would get 100% salary relief plus 50k in transfer fees. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.