Jump to content

White Sox have shown interest in Machado


peppers312
 Share

Recommended Posts

Assuming we do get Machado, I would probably move Anderson to CF for the year to help convince Machado to sign. If he does sign and wants to play short we can keep TA in CF or try to trade him (or move TA to second & Moncada to third). If he signs and is okay playing 3B then we can put TA back at SS. If he doesn't sign then we can end the experiment and put TA back at SS.

 

No matter what happens though, you do not get rid of TA until Machado signs an extension. We have no other real SS prospects in the system so you would have to keep TA as insurance should Machado leave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Sockin @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 01:58 PM)
FWIW this guy says the Cardinals arent willing to put Reyes and Weaver in a Machado deal.

 

@Frank_Cusumano

Now that Ozuna is done, @Cardinals move on: I am told they will not, will not consider moving Reyes and Weaver for Machado.

 

https://twitter.com/Frank_Cusumano/status/941394266793959426

 

Well this makes me nervous because that's a massive package...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nightengale just brought up the rumor that the Sox might flip Machado to the Yankees. Definitely seems like a competitor purposely leaked that in hopes of giving the Orioles cold feet on dealing with us. He also specifically mentioned “the Sox claim their offer isn’t as strong as they’re making it out to be”.

Edited by Chicago White Sox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 02:17 PM)
Nightengale just brought up the rumor that the Sox might flip Machado to the Yankees. Definitely seems like a competitor purposely leaked that in hopes of giving the Orioles cost feet on dealing with us. He also specifically mentioned “the Sox claim their offer isn’t as strong as they’re making it out to be”.

 

Came here to post this. I really don't think Sox offered Giolito or Kopech.

 

Nightengale also said that he doesn't think Sox land Machado, thinks he goes to the Cardinals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 02:07 PM)
A couple of the insiders have mentioned that Angelos’ son has actively been involved in these talks and it appears that factor could increase the likelihood of a deal being completed this week.

 

yuck. Can't imagine how much i would hate if I heard Michael Reinsdorf was influencing a package back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 02:17 PM)
Nightengale just brought up the rumor that the Sox might flip Machado to the Yankees. Definitely seems like a competitor purposely leaked that in hopes of giving the Orioles cold feet on dealing with us. He also specifically mentioned “the Sox claim their offer isn’t as strong as they’re making it out to be”.

Didn't Nightengale also tweet the day that we wouldn't flip him? He's all over the place...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 02:19 PM)
yuck. Can't imagine how much i would hate if I heard Michael Reinsdorf was influencing a package back.

I actually know someone who used to do business with Michael. He is actually more like one of us than anyone would believe when it comes to player personnel despite his affection for GarPax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 02:23 PM)
I actually know someone who used to do business with Michael. He is actually more like one of us than anyone would believe when it comes to player personnel despite his affection for GarPax.

 

"Really nice guy except for when he murders people"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 03:19 PM)
yuck. Can't imagine how much i would hate if I heard Michael Reinsdorf was influencing a package back.

I took it as a positive given how crazy Peter Angelos is, but obviously I don’t know a lot about his son. I just feel like more often than not, the second generation of family ownership is a little more grounded (Wirtz’s, Steinbrenner’s, etc). I feel like us Bulls fans got stuck with the rare bad one in Michael Reinsdorf and his BFF Gar Foreman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 02:26 PM)
I took it as a positive given how crazy Peter Angelos is, but obviously I don’t know a lot about his son. I just feel like more often than not, the second generation of family ownership is a little more grounded (Wirtz’s, Steinbrenner’s, etc). I feel like us Bulls fans got stuck with the rare bad one in Michael Reinsdorf and his BFF Gar Foreman.

 

I suppose you are right. But I prefer owners that sign off on plans and don't dictate them as they are happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...