Jump to content

Sports Betting Thread


pettie4sox
 Share

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (Leonard Zelig @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 10:24 AM)
When you have to risk more than you are going to win, that would be a favorite.

 

Bookies always have juice on their bets. You can tell which of my bets have juice because they deviate from the normal lines. Most books have lines that start at -110 for both or -115.

 

If you have a bookie that has reduced juice, you may get some lines that start at -105 or lower. Very rarely are you going to get even lines on a spread. The objective of the bookie is to make money. They will anticipate 50% of the bets for the favorite and 50% for the underdog.

 

For example, say we both bet on some NFL Championship game action on Sunday. Jags are +7.5, and the Patriots are -7.5. Both lines will be at -110. You bet $110 to win $100 on the Jags at +7.5 and I bet -7.5 for the Pats $110 to win $100. One of us will win obviously so there is $220 in total bets. You win the bet and win you $100 for the bet and your $110 wager gets returned for a total of $210. I lose my $110 and that is used to pay you, but where does that extra $10 go? To the bookie of course.

 

The bookie cannot make money on even lines that is $100 to win $100 because there is no juice. They are just praying you lose your bet so they can gobble up your cash.

Edited by KagakuOtoko
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 18, 2018 -> 05:19 PM)
Terrible misread. Zidane sat his starters and played scrubs.

 

This is what I mean't by bad bets. =)

 

58-49-2

 

+$2043.48

 

Delware v Hofstra O 147 W

 

Drexel v Townson O 144 W

 

-110 for both

 

Tennis to come in a bit.

 

 

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 18, 2018 -> 05:42 PM)
adding

 

Caps vs Devils O 5.5 W

 

-105

 

 

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 18, 2018 -> 08:33 PM)
I am so late with tennis but I don't think anyone is actually tailing, but if you are, let me know and I'll post sooner.

 

Busta/Muller O 39 W

 

-121

 

 

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 18, 2018 -> 10:13 PM)
Overnight bets

 

Perth -10.5 L

 

-115

 

D SCHWARTZMAN VRS A DOLGOPOLOV O 38 W

 

-110

 

K Kanepi vrs C Suarez Navarro O 21 W

 

-123

 

J Ostapenko vrs A Kontaveit O 22 W

 

-108

 

Hot dog what a night! 7-1!

 

YTD 65-50-2

 

+$2628.48

Edited by KagakuOtoko
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am unfamiliar with online betting, so I don't understand why the vig varies so much on bets where they have set the line.

 

Caps vs Devils O 5.5

 

-105

 

K Kanepi vrs C Suarez Navarro O 21

 

-123

 

The book set the line on both of these, but on one you're paying 5% and the other its 23%.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Leonard Zelig @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 11:04 AM)
I am unfamiliar with online betting, so I don't understand why the vig varies so much on bets where they have set the line.

 

Caps vs Devils O 5.5

 

-105

 

K Kanepi vrs C Suarez Navarro O 21

 

-123

 

The book set the line on both of these, but on one you're paying 5% and the other its 23%.

 

Yes but you only pay if you lose :)

 

so the example here is the -105 for the over had reduced juice but the under was where the money was at, -115. The lines start at -110 so you can see how they were skewed.

 

-123 started at -115, so the U 21 would be at -107 because the money was going for the O pretty heavily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 11:06 AM)
Yes but you only pay if you lose :)

 

so the example here is the -105 for the over had reduced juice but the under was where the money was at, -115. The lines start at -110 so you can see how they were skewed.

 

-123 started at -115, so the U 21 would be at -107 because the money was going for the O pretty heavily.

 

So instead of moving the line, the vig changes, that makes more sense now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 12:54 PM)
Berlin v Dortmund O 2.5

 

-112

 

Charleroi v Muouscron O 2.5

 

-105

 

I tailed my buddy for these picks but we'll have to add the double L's to the record.

 

He did get one W with the Turkish League pick so 1-2 isn't the worst but it isn't great either.

 

66-52-2

 

+$2551.48

 

Illinois @ Wisconsin

 

Wisconsin -5

 

-106

 

Manhattan @ Canisius O 137

 

-116

Edited by KagakuOtoko
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 05:48 PM)
I tailed my buddy for these picks but we'll have to add the double L's to the record.

 

He did get one W with the Turkish League pick so 1-2 isn't the worst but it isn't great either.

 

66-52-2

 

+$2551.48

 

Illinois @ Wisconsin

 

Wisconsin -5

 

-106

 

Manhattan @ Canisius O 137

 

-116

 

1-1

 

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 07:07 PM)
Zverev/Chung O 38.5

 

-130 W

 

 

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 10:21 PM)
Barty -4

 

-110 L

 

 

 

Kerber SU W

 

-115

 

 

 

Jok and Fed straight set parlay. W

 

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 10:24 PM)
sydney fc + newcastle jets ml parlay L

 

 

QUOTE (KagakuOtoko @ Jan 19, 2018 -> 10:26 PM)
Seoul Knights -7.5

 

-115 W

 

Overall 5-3 overnight

 

YTD 71-55-2

 

$2825.48

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...