Jump to content

2018 MiLB White Sox news and notes


southsider2k5
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hahn at his press conference today said Dunning is making progress and no surgery is being discussed at this point. That's all I saw, he didn't elaborate on what exactly there were doing or what he was doing. It appears he's not going to be pitching for awhile. We'll see what happens in the spring, if they are wrong it will cost them about six months of potential rehab by not doing the surgery immediately.

We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Lip Man 1 said:

Hahn at his press conference today said Dunning is making progress and no surgery is being discussed at this point. That's all I saw, he didn't elaborate on what exactly there were doing or what he was doing. It appears he's not going to be pitching for awhile. We'll see what happens in the spring, if they are wrong it will cost them about six months of potential rehab by not doing the surgery immediately.

We'll see.

Either way he would miss all of 2019. In your sky is falling and the Sox are idiots scenario he might miss a month or two of 2020 in addition.  I am curious why you think he needs surgery though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, southsider2k5 said:

Either way he would miss all of 2019. In your sky is falling and the Sox are idiots scenario he might miss a month or two of 2020 in addition.  I am curious why you think he needs surgery though.

Not saying he does. My point is no one knows anything about what is going on. Sox aren't saying, much like Rodon's issues over a year and a half. Turned out he did need surgery.

I was just hoping he could pitch so the Sox would know one way or the other if surgery is actually needed. With him not pitching the Sox really don't know his status until he gets back on a mound I'm assuming next February.

And I recall a post from PTATC where he said (paraphrasing) that the majority of these injuries progress to the point where surgery is usually necessary. Don't recall the specific comment but that was the gist of the post as I recall.) 

Edited by Lip Man 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SoxAce said:

Those kind of articles always drive me crazy for one reason.  They called his "floor" a LOOGY.  That is absurd.  He is a guy who doesn't throw 100, is already a reliever, and has nothing that is a super plus tool about him.  To call his floor as a major league reliever specialist is nuts. 

His floor is as a guy who struggles with control in the minors and doesn't make to to the upper levels of the minors, not as a major league reliever.

I appreciate the feature and the information, but that kind of writing drives me crazy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A look a Wilbur Perez.  

Side note, people really need to understand what the term "floor" actually means. His floor is not Juan Minaya. Perez is a 20 year old is the DSL who tops out at 91. His floor is a low minors reliever, not Juan Minaya who can throw near 100.

 

https://www.southsidesox.com/platform/amp/2018/9/13/17852752/under-the-radar-wilber-perez-white-sox-kodi-medeiros-joakim-soria-milwaukee-brewers?utm_campaign=southsidesox&utm_content=chorus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&__twitter_impression=true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

A look a Wilbur Perez.  

Side note, people really need to understand what the term "floor" actually means. His floor is not Juan Minaya. Perez is a 20 year old is the DSL who tops out at 91. His floor is a low minors reliever, not Juan Minaya who can throw near 100.

 

https://www.southsidesox.com/platform/amp/2018/9/13/17852752/under-the-radar-wilber-perez-white-sox-kodi-medeiros-joakim-soria-milwaukee-brewers?utm_campaign=southsidesox&utm_content=chorus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&__twitter_impression=true

Yeah, again, this SSS series is a good idea and sometimes hits the right notes, but the person who writes them isn't super-knowledgeable on how all this works. They also in some of the early versions were throwing out scouting info that clearly wasn't theirs without citing a source, and I had to send a note to their Editor because it was pretty clear some of it was ours.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
36 minutes ago, ChiSoxJon said:

It is a cautionary tale of exactly how much things change in a year looking at those lists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, SoxAce said:

God what a bust he's been. Was never a fan of his in that deal when it was made.

Not sure Bust is the right word. He's never been healthy enough to pitch any significant number of innings. I guess I think of "bust" as a player who doesn't meet expectations on the field, so I'm not sure it counts if he's never on the damn field.

Fortunately he was just a throw-in, 4th player in a deal. No big loss if he doesn't turn out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, NorthSideSox72 said:

Not sure Bust is the right word. He's never been healthy enough to pitch any significant number of innings.

You are correct. Wrong wording there on my part. But I was never a fan in general of acquiring a reliever even as a 4th piece for a top 3 pitcher in the game.

Edited by SoxAce
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...