Jump to content

2018-2019 Official NBA thread


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, bmags said:

Get it Utah.

Stephan Noh had a great piece on why the Bulls shouldn't trade up, and Cowleys article today made me believe the bulls have only mild interest. I actually wouldn't be surprised if Bulls go Reddish or Hayes tonight, or trade back.

I thought the draft was tomorrow?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a very strong opinion about what I wanted in the last draft (and it was a good opinion), but this year I don't. 

I kinda don't think they should swing for the fences, yet I would not be at all upset if they drafted Reddish.

I do not want them to trade up for Garland, but if they select him at 7 that's great. 

I wouldn't mind trading down, and would like to see players like Nickeil Alexander-Walker/Tyler Herro/Ty Jerome, PJ Washington, Clarke etc

No idea where anyone falls for real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN's mock has Culver-Garland-White going in front of the Bulls, which to me is the worst case scenario and leaves them with DeAndre Hunter at 7, which to me is the least exciting possibility but probably the right pick under those circumstances. I wouldn't trade up unless the price is trivial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Jake said:

ESPN's mock has Culver-Garland-White going in front of the Bulls, which to me is the worst case scenario and leaves them with DeAndre Hunter at 7, which to me is the least exciting possibility but probably the right pick under those circumstances. I wouldn't trade up unless the price is trivial.

I would go Reddish or Clarke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SoxAce said:

Brogdon is more of a SG though. Don't really see the fit.

He can absolutely be part of a backcourt with Lavine. Lavine was decent bringing up ball last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, bmags said:

He can absolutely be part of a backcourt with Lavine. Lavine was decent bringing up ball last year

Eh... still 0 playmakers in that backcourt. LaVine does not have the I.Q. or vision to set up his teammates in that aspect. BUT, the Bulls aren't gonna attract any superstar players anyway so...

Edited by SoxAce
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SoxAce said:

Eh... still 0 playmakers in that backcourt. LaVine does not have the I.Q. or vision to set up his teammates at all. BUT, the Bulls aren't gonna attract any good players anyways so...

By playmakers do you mean facilitators?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...