soxfan49 Posted March 20, 2020 Share Posted March 20, 2020 32 minutes ago, Tony said: barf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Parkman Posted March 20, 2020 Share Posted March 20, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Tony said: You just posted a Chief article, as if you agree with it. If your hockey credibility was already damaged in my mind, now it's destroyed. Chief is quite frankly the biggest meathead out there. If you agree with his takes, I can't help you. I'm done discussing hockey on SoxTalk. This is just too much. Chief is the Hockey equivalent of the McGowan callers on the Score during the Trestman Era Bears. Anyone who agrees with Chief loses all credibility instantly, and I know it's not worth arguing anymore. Bye. Edited March 20, 2020 by Jack Parkman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan49 Posted March 22, 2020 Share Posted March 22, 2020 On 3/19/2020 at 9:19 PM, Jack Parkman said: You just posted a Chief article, as if you agree with it. If your hockey credibility was already damaged in my mind, now it's destroyed. Chief is quite frankly the biggest meathead out there. If you agree with his takes, I can't help you. I'm done discussing hockey on SoxTalk. This is just too much. Chief is the Hockey equivalent of the McGowan callers on the Score during the Trestman Era Bears. Anyone who agrees with Chief loses all credibility instantly, and I know it's not worth arguing anymore. Bye. The hell is wrong with you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 FWIW... from Chief. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 11, 2020 Author Share Posted April 11, 2020 I wonder what the Hawks could get for Patrick Kane? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 Powers reporting the Mitchell news now (basically all but official). Getting him in the fold is HUGE for the franchise. Yes I think he's going to be that good. https://www.nbcsports.com/chicago/blackhawks/report-blackhawks-agree-terms-prospect-ian-mitchell-entry-level-contract Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 Jesus, 25 is way too young. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan49 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 Crazy how Chief had it before anyone, right @Tony and @Jack Parkman? I guess that means Jack has lost all credibility now right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Right side of the Hawks will be set for the next few years. Bovqist, Mitchell, and Murphy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 29 minutes ago, Tony said: Murphy has turned into a fairly serviceable guy, thought he was having a decent season. (Agreeing with you, ha). Hawks still need a lot of work, but hopefully the upcoming core can start to provide a foundation for the future. I'm a big fan of Murphy. He'll be that veteran too on the backhand after Keith. He could be one half of a defensive line like back in the day with Hammer and Oduya. Thanks for agreeing with me, Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 27, 2020 Author Share Posted April 27, 2020 9 minutes ago, Tony said: HOLY SMOKES And a Wirtz got put into the job. I wonder if this is the start of the selloff or a last gasp run? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Parkman Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 (edited) Yesssssss......This made my day. Quite frankly, despite my defense of Bowman over the years, I'm pretty indifferent about him. I think McCub lost his job because he was pulling some strings that Bowman didn't want. Bowman has been pretty average since the 2015-16 season. If there are changes, one thing they don't need to change is their amateur and international scouting department. They've been nails for a while. Over a decade, while winning, the Hawks only drafted one complete bust in the 1st round and found a lot of contributors. I don't know how much is the Bowmans and how much is Mark Kelley. This is the most important department for the Blackhawks right now. If they choose to retain Bowman, I'm fine with that decision and if they choose to move on, I'm fine with that. Just don't lose the scouting department that looks pretty smart lately with Kubalik and Dach. Edited April 27, 2020 by Jack Parkman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan49 Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 30 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said: Yesssssss......This made my day. Quite frankly, despite my defense of Bowman over the years, I'm pretty indifferent about him. I think McCub lost his job because he was pulling some strings that Bowman didn't want. Bowman has been pretty average since the 2015-16 season. If there are changes, one thing they don't need to change is their amateur and international scouting department. They've been nails for a while. Over a decade, while winning, the Hawks only drafted one complete bust in the 1st round and found a lot of contributors. I don't know how much is the Bowmans and how much is Mark Kelley. This is the most important department for the Blackhawks right now. If they choose to retain Bowman, I'm fine with that decision and if they choose to move on, I'm fine with that. Just don't lose the scouting department that looks pretty smart lately with Kubalik and Dach. Did you see who broke the news? cc @Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 48 minutes ago, Tony said: HOLY SMOKES Hell yea! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Parkman Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 (edited) BTW, I don't doubt Chief has sources, I think his opinion pieces are the meatball of meatballs. 100% Spicy Italian. He's broken stuff before, I know that. There's a difference between fact and opinion. Edited April 27, 2020 by Jack Parkman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 He was released from his role.....that is interesting wording. I wonder if he is has another option lined up, I am guessing he did not have a role in hockey decisions but I could be wrong. I could see him getting a gig with the Fire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan49 Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 18 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said: BTW, I don't doubt Chief has sources, I think his opinion pieces are the meatball of meatballs. 100% Spicy Italian. He's broken stuff before, I know that. There's a difference between fact and opinion. You doubt he has sources? So he randomly picked the day they signed Mitchell & the day they fired McDonough and decided to post prior to hoping for a miracle and magically he got them both right? Good lord. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, soxfan49 said: You doubt he has sources? So he randomly picked the day they signed Mitchell & the day they fired McDonough and decided to post prior to hoping for a miracle and magically he got them both right? Good lord. Might want to re read his post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Parkman Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Tony said: You're referring to yourself, right???? (with regard to the Hawks) Edited April 27, 2020 by Jack Parkman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Parkman Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, soxfan49 said: You doubt he has sources? So he randomly picked the day they signed Mitchell & the day they fired McDonough and decided to post prior to hoping for a miracle and magically he got them both right? Good lord. Reading is hard. Edited April 27, 2020 by Jack Parkman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 41 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said: BTW, I don't doubt Chief has sources, I think his opinion pieces are the meatball of meatballs. 100% Spicy Italian. He's broken stuff before, I know that. There's a difference between fact and opinion. Took you a while to realize that and I'm not the biggest Chief fan as far as discussing hockey but he's always had sources. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan49 Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 16 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said: Reading is hard. u mad bro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan49 Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 10 minutes ago, Tony said: No, moreseo your points about the Hawks defense not being a problem this season, and you constantly holding water for Bowman. That, and you consistently having to walk back, edit, or "clarify" your stance after everyone demolishes your paper-thin arguments. Oh, and you saying last month you were done talking hockey on Soxtalk, but of course none of us actually believing it. That's what I was referring to, to be clear. Don't forget stage 4, which is issuing a pathetic apology Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Parkman Posted April 27, 2020 Share Posted April 27, 2020 (edited) 28 minutes ago, Tony said: No, moreseo your points about the Hawks defense not being a problem this season, and you constantly holding water for Bowman. That, and you consistently having to walk back, edit, or "clarify" your stance after everyone demolishes your paper-thin arguments. Oh, and you saying last month you were done talking hockey on Soxtalk, but of course none of us actually believing it. That's what I was referring to, to be clear. I only came back to post because it's big news. I maintain that the problem with the Hawks D lies with the forwards and not the defensemen, other than the fact that they're missing a true #1D. Not gonna argue anymore on here about this. I commented on the big news and I'm done. Edited April 27, 2020 by Jack Parkman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.