Jump to content

Harper to Phillies 13yr/330 mil


Kyyle23
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Kpet1010 said:

Totally saw this coming. 

 

Check out @SchinstalksSox1’s Tweet:

This guy broke it yesterday and has had legit insider info. He also broke then signing another outfielder after ervin Santana. He says the Sox are waiting until the final bid requests come in to make their move. Hence them being "out". Going to try to pull what the Padres did to them

 

 

Who is this guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lillian said:

If he wants to take a short term deal, how about 4 years @ $40 Million per, no opt outs? After 4 years, he can go across town and play with his Buddy Bryant, if he's still a Cub. The Harpers wouldn't even need to sell their house.

Pretty obvious he prefers the west coast.  If he's signing a short term deal, it isn't going to be with the White Sox.  

Only reason he would sign with the Sox is 1) they offer the most money and 2) they offer the most money and he hates the idea of spending 10 years in Philly.

End of story.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Y2Jimmy0 said:

Bryce Harper isn't taking a short-term deal. You don't hire Scott Boras to do that. he'll get his $$. 

If a team is willing to put 4/$160 on the table, why would that same team not be willing to put up the next 6/$160 to put it in the range of Stanton's deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, fathom said:

I'm thinking the Sox are just about out of this, even if they were trying to be under the radar.  One of the Giants or Dodgers will end up offering long-term.

If that happens, you can say bye-bye to Harper. If neither do, then there is a nonzero chance. ( nonzero means less than .001 percent but greater than zero. ) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Balta1701 said:

If a team is willing to put 4/$160 on the table, why would that same team not be willing to put up the next 6/$160 to put it in the range of Stanton's deal?

Because there is a significant difference between 4/$160M and 10/$320M????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Balta1701 said:

If a team is willing to put 4/$160 on the table, why would that same team not be willing to put up the next 6/$160 to put it in the range of Stanton's deal?

I agree with you/ A team like the Dodgers is screwed financially if they do a short-term deal. I think if he ends up in LA, the deal will be like 13-14 years with opt outs to lower the CBT amount. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...