Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
bmags

Badler 2020 J2 Preview

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, bmags said:

https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/2020-mlb-international-prospects-preview/

Control+F for white sox: 0 results

Control+F for twins: 1 result

Control+F for tigers: 1 result

So when you state "0 results," it means that this org is not linked to any of the top prospects, and that we should assume that they'll [once again] try to trade away international bonus pool space for players, yes?

 

After all, they're free, since the Reinsdorfs won't have to actually send money to another team, just the ability for another team to spend money on prospects in exchange for the Thyago Vieiras  and the like...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Two-Gun Pete said:

So when you state "0 results," it means that this org is not linked to any of the top prospects, and that we should assume that they'll [once again] try to trade away international bonus pool space for players, yes?

 

After all, they're free, since the Reinsdorfs won't have to actually send money to another team, just the ability for another team to spend money on prospects in exchange for the Thyago Vieiras  and the like...

It was one thing to trade the slots when they were in penalty.  To do it now is shameful, ignorant and lazy.  If that is indeed how they proceed, it is a damning evidence to the competence and will to compete for this organization.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, bmags said:

https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/2020-mlb-international-prospects-preview/

Control+F for white sox: 0 results

Control+F for twins: 1 result

Control+F for tigers: 1 result

 

3 hours ago, Two-Gun Pete said:

So when you state "0 results," it means that this org is not linked to any of the top prospects, and that we should assume that they'll [once again] try to trade away international bonus pool space for players, yes?

 

After all, they're free, since the Reinsdorfs won't have to actually send money to another team, just the ability for another team to spend money on prospects in exchange for the Thyago Vieiras  and the like...

https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/2020-international-mlb-prospects-preview-more-top-players-to-watch/ 

That original link from Aug 21 has 10 players on it, none of which are linked to the Sox. A new one was released today (the above link), that has 6 different players on it, none of which are linked to the Sox as well. The optimist in me says that not all of the top guys have had their "links" announced yet, so there's still hope for some of next guys that make these articles. The pessimist in me says why the hell aren't the Sox tied to any of these guys, knowing that the team would be out of the penalty (for the 2nd year) and had ample time to prepare for this. 

I'd say it's a bit too early to proclaim that they're for sure going to trade the INTL space away, but as we all know, old habits are hard to break with this team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Sleepy Harold said:

 

https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/2020-international-mlb-prospects-preview-more-top-players-to-watch/ 

That original link from Aug 21 has 10 players on it, none of which are linked to the Sox. A new one was released today (the above link), that has 6 different players on it, none of which are linked to the Sox as well. The optimist in me says that not all of the top guys have had their "links" announced yet, so there's still hope for some of next guys that make these articles. The pessimist in me says why the hell aren't the Sox tied to any of these guys, knowing that the team would be out of the penalty (for the 2nd year) and had ample time to prepare for this. 

I'd say it's a bit too early to proclaim that they're for sure going to trade the INTL space away, but as we all know, old habits are hard to break with this team.

Here is my fear:

- The reporting of Badler that it has gotten to the point teams are negotiating with 13-14 year olds

- Jerry Reinsdorf, already a skeptic of spending money on “crapshoot” 16 year olds refuses to allow Sox to play that field

- Jerry ties his own organizations hands in international so he can have bigger bargaining power in next CBA to install a draft.

- Meanwhile sox lose out on best pipeline to keep infusing talent while competitive, and lack prospects to trade and hit ceiling of budget too soon.

obviously point two is my theory, but Sox have jumped on opportunities to sign older talent in international while always saying what a crapshoot signing 16 year olds is.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, bmags said:

Here is my fear:

- The reporting of Badler that it has gotten to the point teams are negotiating with 13-14 year olds

- Jerry Reinsdorf, already a skeptic of spending money on “crapshoot” 16 year olds refuses to allow Sox to play that field

- Jerry ties his own organizations hands in international so he can have bigger bargaining power in next CBA to install a draft.

- Meanwhile sox lose out on best pipeline to keep infusing talent while competitive, and lack prospects to trade and hit ceiling of budget too soon.

obviously point two is my theory, but Sox have jumped on opportunities to sign older talent in international while always saying what a crapshoot signing 16 year olds is.

I don't disagree with anything that you've put out here. I'm just hoping that they take some "risks" with these types of players. I'm just trying to stay semi-optimistic so I don't completely go crazy over their unwillingness to stray from their usual, dumb path. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Sleepy Harold said:

I don't disagree with anything that you've put out here. I'm just hoping that they take some "risks" with these types of players. I'm just trying to stay semi-optimistic so I don't completely go crazy over their unwillingness to stray from their usual, dumb path. 

And I also would not be upset if they did not have a top 15 guy (there are only 15 !) as long as they had a large quantity and mix of some more expensive ones. I really liked 2016s pre Robert! I think 2015 was great! 2019 cannot happen again.

edit: even though 2015 without tatis did not perform that great, they had a decent sized class with some interesting players that didn't perform. It happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, bmags said:

And I also would not be upset if they did not have a top 15 guy (there are only 15 !) as long as they had a large quantity and mix of some more expensive ones. I really liked 2016s pre Robert! I think 2015 was great! 2019 cannot happen again.

edit: even though 2015 without tatis did not perform that great, they had a decent sized class with some interesting players that didn't perform. It happens.

100% if they're able to add a few of the backend top 30 guys, I wouldn't be upset with that at all. It just sucks that we've made it halfway through the list and we've got nothing but crickets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure they'll spend on older prospects. Probably some guys from Cuba. This organization is so averse to risk when it comes to 16-year-old signings. The biggest bonus ever is like $1.6 million still I believe. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Y2Jimmy0 said:

I'm sure they'll spend on older prospects. Probably some guys from Cuba. This organization is so averse to risk when it comes to 16-year-old signings. The biggest bonus ever is like $1.6 million still I believe. 

Micker Adolfo. I think that one has completely scared JR off. He's going to continue to tap the Cuban pipeline. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is so frustrating that the organization continues to scoff at what is probably the best way to add impact talent.  I get that they are young and there is a larger chance the guys don't pan out.  But cmon.  The entire pool is like 5.4 million.  Why would you not invest it as aggressively as possible.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, turnin' two said:

It is so frustrating that the organization continues to scoff at what is probably the best way to add impact talent.  I get that they are young and there is a larger chance the guys don't pan out.  But cmon.  The entire pool is like 5.4 million.  Why would you not invest it as aggressively as possible.  

Especially when a study showed it is quite literally the best investment you can make in player acquisition.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how much cash the white sox could get for prospects or current players?  What kind of dollar figure would Robert, Moncado, or Giolito bring back in return?  Might be a nice little bonus before selling the team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunately, draft picks can't be traded.  If the Sox ran the draft like they do signing international prospects they would trade their 1st round draft pick for cash and then trade their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th round picks to acquire as many picks in the 10th round as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/12/2019 at 11:17 PM, Good Guys said:

I wonder how much cash the white sox could get for prospects or current players?  What kind of dollar figure would Robert, Moncado, or Giolito bring back in return?  Might be a nice little bonus before selling the team.

Only Bill Veeck would have done that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×