Jump to content

Sox acquire Nomar Mazara for Steele Walker


Buehrle>Wood
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Leury can’t hit RHP.

Yes, but the poster I was responding to was suggesting to bring Zobrist in to play second until Madrigal arrives, platoon with Mazara against “LHP”, and be a super utility guy.  
 

Despite Leury not being optimal against RHP, he is more than an adequate in-house solution to fulfill all three objectives.  I would much rather go with him than try and squeeze out the last of the toothpaste left in a 39 year-old Ben Zobrist.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Thad Bosley said:

Yes, but the poster I was responding to was suggesting to bring Zobrist in to play second until Madrigal arrives, platoon with Mazara against “LHP”, and be a super utility guy.  
 

Despite Leury not being optimal against RHP, he is more than an adequate in-house solution to fulfill all three objectives.  I would much rather go with him than try and squeeze out the last of the toothpaste left in a 39 year-old Ben Zobrist.  

Zobrist was 23% better than a league average hitter in 2018, but struggled last year as he dealt with marital issues.  I think it remains to be seen how much he has left in the tank, but the cost to find out should be minuscule enough to gamble on the upside.

As for Leury, his favorable splits against LHP (113 wRC+) is based on a SSS (280 PAs) and involves an unsustainable BABIP (.388).  I worry his production against LHP may be just a fluke and if it regresses he suddenly isn’t a good platoon partner for Mazara and a well below average hitter in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Zobrist was 23% better than a league average hitter in 2018, but struggled last year as he dealt with marital issues.  I think it remains to be seen how much he has left in the tank, but the cost to find out should be minuscule enough to gamble on the upside.

As for Leury, his favorable splits against LHP (113 wRC+) is based on a SSS (280 PAs) and involves an unsustainable BABIP (.388).  I worry his production against LHP may be just a fluke and if it regresses he suddenly isn’t a good platoon partner for Mazara and a well below average hitter in general.

Is Zobrist even going to play next year? I don’t really want anything to do with him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

No idea.  But if he’s willing to, I’d happily give him a shot.

He could be toast but due to his performance last year and his age, he could be signed for next to nothing for a season.  I wouldn’t mind adding him when our other options to fill those right-handed at bats at 2B and in RF are Leury and Engel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BackDoorBreach said:

Imagine just signing Castellanos or Ozuna so you didn't have a platoon featuring Adam Engle or Leury.

Imagine committing to the worst OF defense in the league for the duration of their contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Zobrist was 23% better than a league average hitter in 2018, but struggled last year as he dealt with marital issues.  I think it remains to be seen how much he has left in the tank, but the cost to find out should be minuscule enough to gamble on the upside.

As for Leury, his favorable splits against LHP (113 wRC+) is based on a SSS (280 PAs) and involves an unsustainable BABIP (.388).  I worry his production against LHP may be just a fluke and if it regresses he suddenly isn’t a good platoon partner for Mazara and a well below average hitter in general.

I think when you talk about Zobrist it's difficult to use 2018 numbers simply because of his age. You just cant ignore his 2019 despite the marital problem because he is in his late 30's and any bad year can be the end.

Leury has been remarkably consistent the last 3 years against LH pitching always batting higher than .300 and decent OBP. I'm sure you can look up his stats easily from 2017-2019. I'll take his 10 yr. age difference and consistency over Zobrist despite the lack of power and walks. His BA carries his OBP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BackDoorBreach said:

Mazara is bad at defense and bad at hitting.  The move doesn't make any sense regardless of how you want to split it.

Mazara is a slightly below average RF (not awful), he mashes RHP, and adds much need balance to the lineup.  He's not perfect, but he is also a 1 year stopgap.  Maybe he blows up and he sticks around for 2 years, but if he's the same Mazara he's always been in 2020, we'll have a new RF in 2021.  

Castellanos or Ozuna isn't happening, man.  They don't make any sense at this point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CaliSoxFanViaSWside said:

I think when you talk about Zobrist it's difficult to use 2018 numbers simply because of his age. You just cant ignore his 2019 despite the marital problem because he is in his late 30's and any bad year can be the end.

Leury has been remarkably consistent the last 3 years against LH pitching always batting higher than .300 and decent OBP. I'm sure you can look up his stats easily from 2017-2019. I'll take his 10 yr. age difference and consistency over Zobrist despite the lack of power and walks. His BA carries his OBP.

I’m not suggesting that we get rid of Leury, I’m proposing adding Zobrist on the cheap as an additional bench piece.  If Zobrist is even 85% of his 2018 form, he’s better suited for the role I’ve been discussing (interim 2B / platoon RF once Madrigal is up).  If he doesn’t work out, then release him in a couple months and cal up Engel, Mendick, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, BackDoorBreach said:

Imagine just signing Castellanos or Ozuna so you didn't have a platoon featuring Adam Engle or Leury.

Imagine not, since both play Soccer for Defense.   A platoon would be happening even for late inning defense featuring Engle or Garcia. Like it or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BackDoorBreach said:

Mazara is bad at defense and bad at hitting.  The move doesn't make any sense regardless of how you want to split it.

Come on, it's way more nuanced a move than that.  Mazara is a young player with standout tools who has, to this point been only a replace-level player, but a lot of people around the league think there is at least a small chance that a change of scenery could lead to a breakout season for him.  At best, this happens and the Sox extend the team option at low cost.  At worst, he is the "meh" player he has been to this point, but having your worst hitter, and a guy who will probably hit around 8th in the lineup, be a 96 OPS+ hitter is not gonna sink the ship.  

 

When you look at the move in the overall context of all the moves they made this offseason, it makes sense to take a flier on a guy you think could realize his potential here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BackDoorBreach said:

Mazara is bad at defense and bad at hitting.  The move doesn't make any sense regardless of how you want to split it.

I wasn’t a huge fan of the Mazara addition, but here is how they each did against RHP last year:

  • Mazara: 110 wRC+
  • Castellanos: 106 wRC+ 

Yes, Nick destroys LHP and wouldn’t require a platoon mate, but ~75% they are about the same caliber of hitter.  With the right platoon partner, I think we can get a little less production (when factoring in defense) for a fraction of the cost.  I do like Castellanos and think there’s room for growth but he definitely isn’t a perfect fit if he required a four year deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sullythered said:

Come on, it's way more nuanced a move than that.  Mazara is a young player with standout tools who has, to this point been only a replace-level player, but a lot of people around the league think there is at least a small chance that a change of scenery could lead to a breakout season for him.  At best, this happens and the Sox extend the team option at low cost.  At worst, he is the "meh" player he has been to this point, but having your worst hitter, and a guy who will probably hit around 8th in the lineup, be a 96 OPS+ hitter is not gonna sink the ship.  

 

When you look at the move in the overall context of all the moves they made this offseason, it makes sense to take a flier on a guy you think could realize his potential here.

Mazara reminds me quite a bit of Avisail Garcia in terms of the pedigree and talent is there, he just does not seem to put it all together

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sullythered said:

Come on, it's way more nuanced a move than that.  Mazara is a young player with standout tools who has, to this point been only a replace-level player, but a lot of people around the league think there is at least a small chance that a change of scenery could lead to a breakout season for him.  At best, this happens and the Sox extend the team option at low cost.  At worst, he is the "meh" player he has been to this point, but having your worst hitter, and a guy who will probably hit around 8th in the lineup, be a 96 OPS+ hitter is not gonna sink the ship.  

 

When you look at the move in the overall context of all the moves they made this offseason, it makes sense to take a flier on a guy you think could realize his potential here.

I am trending toward this being an educated, well-informed gamble on a 24 yoa guy with good upside. He will not be worse than average against righties and this will not end up a disaster. He also makes plays in the field but I assume his range is a bit low and plodding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, steveno89 said:

Mazara reminds me quite a bit of Avisail Garcia in terms of the pedigree and talent is there, he just does not seem to put it all together

Mazara has about 5x  more pedigree and alleged talent than Avi ever had. Avi was a fringe top 100 guy according to one publication and unranked by anyone else. Mazara was a universal top 20 guy and rated as high as #5. 

Edited by mqr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

I wasn’t a huge fan of the Mazara addition, but here is how they each did against RHP last year:

  • Mazara: 110 wRC+
  • Castellanos: 106 wRC+ 

Yes, Nick destroys LHP and wouldn’t require a platoon mate, but ~75% they are about the same caliber of hitter.  With the right platoon partner, I think we can get a little less production (when factoring in defense) for a fraction of the cost.  I do like Castellanos and think there’s room for growth but he definitely isn’t a perfect fit if he required a four year deal.

Castellanos has the 3rd most XBHs in baseball the last 3 years and has increasingly good peripherals over the same period.  Mazara has been the same replacement level player for 4 years and was/is a legitimate non-tender candidate.

If you are going to aquire a player via trade when you are about to compete, he should at least be good at 1 facet of the game.  The move isn't going to "blowup" because the rest of the lineup is so strong.  That doesn't make this a good move because of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BackDoorBreach said:

The move isn't going to "blowup" because the rest of the lineup is so strong.  That doesn't make this a good move because of that.

It does though. Nick Castellanos is not worth committing 4 years too. Not even close. 

Edited by mqr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, ChiliIrishHammock24 said:

Hunter Pence is still out there.

I am guessing Pillar gets snapped up because he can still play CF.  I wonder if Hahn slow plays the bench market and grabs Pence or Zobrist closer to the start of spring training for next to nothing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mqr said:

It does though. Nick Castellanos is not worth committing 4 years too. Not even close. 

By what metric aside from your opinion?  Because by fWAR which literally almost everyone on this site goes by he is? He is the best RF available that is obtainable over at least the next 2 years unless you plan on getting Pederson that will surely have plenty of suitors.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BackDoorBreach said:

By what metric aside from your opinion?  Because by fWAR which literally almost everyone on this site goes by he is? He is the best RF available that is obtainable over at least the next 2 years unless you plan on getting Pederson that will surely have plenty of suitors.

  

Well first, he's only a RF in title. He should not be a RF. He's a DH. We already have one of those playing first base, left field and eventually catcher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BackDoorBreach said:

By what metric aside from your opinion?  Because by fWAR which literally almost everyone on this site goes by he is? He is the best RF available that is obtainable over at least the next 2 years unless you plan on getting Pederson that will surely have plenty of suitors.

I don't understand how this is so hard for you to process.  Over the last two seasons, per fWAR, Nick Castellanos has been THE WORST outfield defender in the ENTIRE game.  Last season alone, Castellanos was -12.6 dfWAR and Eloy was -11 dfWAR.  That is the worst and the ~10th worst outfield defenders in the game.  

Committing to that situation long term is insane.  Especially with our young pitching staff.  Please try to understand that.  

Edited by ChiSox59
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...