Moan4Yoan Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 4 minutes ago, Harold's Leg Lift said: Hells yes get in on that. I’d honestly rather trade for Senzel than go after Betts or Springer next offseason. Do the Reds need a 1B prospect to replace Votto? Would Vaughn and Stiever get it done? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harold's Leg Lift Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Moan4Yoan said: I’d honestly rather trade for Senzel than go after Betts or Springer next offseason. Do the Reds need a 1B prospect to replace Votto? Would Vaughn and Stiever get it done? Works for me. They can throw in Fulmer too. I'm sure Boddy thinks he can fix him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 This makes me so happy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moan4Yoan Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Just now, fathom said: This makes me so happy That’s cuz you bought into The Score and Twitter rumors far too much. The Cubs probably won’t have $64 million to spend even if they trade Bryant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moan4Yoan Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 4 minutes ago, Harold's Leg Lift said: Works for me. They can throw in Fulmer too. I'm sure Boddy thinks he can fix him. Sure, why not lol. Extra throw-in! Vaughn, Stiever, and Fulmer for Senzel. Hahn mentioned he is still searching for a long-term RF target. If there is any truth to the Reds making Senzel available, go nuts Rick! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Moan4Yoan said: That’s cuz you bought into The Score and Twitter rumors far too much. The Cubs probably won’t have $64 million to spend even if they trade Bryant. No it’s because I love Castellanos and if we weren’t getting him, I wanted him to torment the Cubs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 14 minutes ago, TomPickle said: Lindor makes a lot of sense for the Reds, but Senzel is nowhere near the rumored Dodgers offer of Lux and May. Lodolo is the only top 100 guy in the Reds minor league system right now. I don't know what value Winker has at this point either, but the Indians OF is terrible so those guys would both be upgrades for them. The Dodgers never offered Lux and May. Had they done so, Lindor would already be in LA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Just now, Moan4Yoan said: Sure, why not lol. Extra throw-in! Vaughn, Stiever, and Fulmer for Senzel. Hahn mentioned he is still searching for a long-term RF target. If there is any truth to the Reds making Senzel available, go nuts Rick! Ugh no thanks. Vaughn is better IMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Moan4Yoan said: Sure, why not lol. Extra throw-in! Vaughn, Stiever, and Fulmer for Senzel. Hahn mentioned he is still searching for a long-term RF target. If there is any truth to the Reds making Senzel available, go nuts Rick! You do realize Senzel had an 89 OPS+ last year, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomPickle Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Steve9347 said: The Dodgers never offered Lux and May. Had they done so, Lindor would already be in LA. I agree, but that's what was floated out there. That's probably what the Indians were asking. Lux alone is still much more valuable than Senzel. May is probably about equal value to Senzel at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moan4Yoan Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, fathom said: Ugh no thanks. Vaughn is better IMO He’s still a 1B. Sox have Abreu around for 3 more seasons and could have Encarnacion around for 2 more. Draft another one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Moan4Yoan said: Sure, why not lol. Extra throw-in! Vaughn, Stiever, and Fulmer for Senzel. Hahn mentioned he is still searching for a long-term RF target. If there is any truth to the Reds making Senzel available, go nuts Rick! Why would the Reds trade Senzel for MiLB assets when they're in win now mode? I wouldnt trade vaughn/stiever for Senzel but I am much higher on Vaughn than many here. I wouldn't hate the deal, I just think Vaughn is gonna be a 140-150 wRC+ bat consistently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harold's Leg Lift Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Moan4Yoan said: Sure, why not lol. Extra throw-in! Vaughn, Stiever, and Fulmer for Senzel. Hahn mentioned he is still searching for a long-term RF target. If there is any truth to the Reds making Senzel available, go nuts Rick! Senzel at 2B and sign Betts to play RF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Senzel and prospects for Lindor makes way too much sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moan4Yoan Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Steve9347 said: You do realize Senzel had an 89 OPS+ last year, right? You do realize that it was his rookie season? How often have we seen young players struggle early only to turn into studs? Moncada, Giolito? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justinsettle Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 9 minutes ago, Moan4Yoan said: I’d honestly rather trade for Senzel than go after Betts or Springer next offseason. Do the Reds need a 1B prospect to replace Votto? Would Vaughn and Stiever get it done? That would be giving up way too much for someone who has shown really nothing in 375 AB at the major league level. Really just trading prospect for prospect at this point. I would love to have him but Vaughn could easily be rated top 10 prospect in baseball by the end of next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, Moan4Yoan said: He’s still a 1B. Sox have Abreu around for 3 more seasons and could have Encarnacion around for 2 more. Draft another one. Vaughn is the best hitting prospect to come out of college in 10 years; imo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tnetennba Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 3 minutes ago, Harold's Leg Lift said: Senzel at 2B and sign Betts to play RF. Harold already trying to get rid of Madrigal again. This guy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Just now, SouthWallace said: Wow, really nice deal for Castellano's would love to know the opt out rules if there are any. I always thought if Castellanos could prove himself that last years second half wasn't a fluke he could get big money next year. Now he has a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 3 minutes ago, Justinsettle said: That would be giving up way too much for someone who has shown really nothing in 375 AB at the major league level. Really just trading prospect for prospect at this point. I would love to have him but Vaughn could easily be rated top 10 prospect in baseball by the end of next year. Senzel was a top 10 prospect by all publications entering last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moan4Yoan Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Just now, Look at Ray Ray Run said: Wow, really nice deal for Castellano's would love to know the opt out rules if there are any. I always thought if Castellanos could prove himself that last years second half wasn't a fluke he could get big money next year. Now he has a chance. He already got pretty big money, compared to Ozuna. But yeah, this is a great deal for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harold's Leg Lift Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 3 minutes ago, Justinsettle said: That would be giving up way too much for someone who has shown really nothing in 375 AB at the major league level. Really just trading prospect for prospect at this point. I would love to have him but Vaughn could easily be rated top 10 prospect in baseball by the end of next year. Senzel was rated a top 10 prospect last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 19 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said: This seems like a terrible thing for the Reds; a terrible idea. They are really trying to create as short of a window as possible with some of these moves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Just now, Harold's Leg Lift said: Senzel was rated a top 10 prospect last year. Yeah, I think the point being made is it's still a prospect for prospect swap, and one could argue Vaughn is on Senzel's level as a prospect so adding Stiever would be an overpay. Either way, the deal doesn't really make sense for either club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.