Jump to content

COVID-19/Coronavirus thread


caulfield12
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ptatc said:

By being further a part and having an easier time of it spreading from place to place. In many of the other countries the population is so dense everywhere. The US is spread out pretty well. It will make it easier to keep from spreading.

The population density in big cities in the USA is every bit as packed as Italy and China.

The fact that the western part of the country has a low population density doesn't help slow the spread in population centers; which is where the majority of Americans live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

The population density in big cities in the USA is every bit as packed as Italy and China.

The fact that the western part of the country has a low population density doesn't help slow the spread in population centers; which is where the majority of Americans live.

Correct. I meant as far as spreading wildly throughout the nation. We can isolate it much more effciently for the country as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Yeah, and as a society no one gives a damn about old people because we're fvcked up. "BuT iT WoN't EfFeCt Me!"

Uh, I mean yes I worry more about my children dying than my dad. I would be in a bubble suit right now if the infant/toddler death rate was 17.5%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ptatc said:

Correct. I meant as far as spreading wildly throughout the nation. We can isolate it much more effciently for the country as a whole.

This would be great in theory if American's actually listened and took it seriously. Sadly, everyone is still going to work. My wife still has class despite a father of a student testing positive. The entire thing is a clusterfuck. 

The problem is American's don't like to be told what to do, and they don't listen to things that the media deems serious because they're idiots. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bmags said:

Uh, I mean yes I worry more about my children dying than my dad. I would be in a bubble suit right now if the infant/toddler death rate was 17.5%.

That's fair BMags, but sadly the way things are reported we have already downplayed the fatality percentages because it's "only effecting old people." As if old peoples lives don't mean as much to the average person.

If my dad died - I don't have children yet - I would be absolutely destroyed and devastated. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

This would be great in theory if American's actually listened and took it seriously. Sadly, everyone is still going to work. My wife still has class despite a father of a student testing positive. The entire thing is a clusterfuck. 

The problem is American's don't like to be told what to do, and they don't listen to things that the media deems serious because they're idiots. 

This is a bit narrow-minded. You can't expect 100% of people to stop making a living. Isn't the stat like 1/4 of the country doesn't have vacation time and are paid hourly?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ptatc said:

By being further a part and having an easier time of it spreading from place to place. In many of the other countries the population is so dense everywhere. The US is spread out pretty well. It will make it easier to keep from spreading.

I dunno, it's spread to a whole bunch of states already. Even "sparse" states like Wyoming are reporting cases now. There's only a few left without their first cases.

Most Americans live in urban or suburban environments. The overall population density in the US is low thanks to enormous amounts of unpopulated land west of the Rockies. 20 states are just as or more dense than Italy. Texas is heavily populated but density is low because so much of west Texas is just completely empty. It's still going to tear through population centers like Dallas, Houston etc. Iran is getting hit brutally hard and is only slightly more dense than the US as a whole.

Edited by StrangeSox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a Patton Oswalt(?) bit about how one day times will become so crazy that we will turn to boring, grounded movies, instead of fantasy, to escape reality. 

I watched Chef last night and it was the happiest I've been in a week. 

We're at that point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jenksismyhero said:

This is a bit narrow-minded. You can't expect 100% of people to stop making a living. Isn't the stat like 1/4 of the country doesn't have vacation time and are paid hourly?

What are those people going to do when the economy grinds to a halt and they lose their jobs anyway? Oh, and probably their insurance with it?

Not saying there's an easy answer either way, but continuing on as normal won't address those issues, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ptatc said:

Correct. I meant as far as spreading wildly throughout the nation. We can isolate it much more effciently for the country as a whole.

If you had perhaps supported me a week and a half ago when I argued for major travel shutdowns I might agree. But now? It’s everywhere. If you have people going to the store in Pierre South Dakota, or going to work in St Louis, they will pass it along. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

This would be great in theory if American's actually listened and took it seriously. Sadly, everyone is still going to work. My wife still has class despite a father of a student testing positive. The entire thing is a clusterfuck. 

The problem is American's don't like to be told what to do, and they don't listen to things that the media deems serious because they're idiots. 

As long as travel and such are limited it will have a greater effect. It will still limit it especially if large groups are avoided. There is no way to absolutely stop it but containing the spread it the goal. There will be cells pop up and containing that is the key.

Most colleges are extending break, making break earlier and doing online classes for 2 weeks after. Essentially that limits many large gatherings until mid-April. we'll see how that limits it going forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, StrangeSox said:

What are those people going to do when the economy grinds to a halt and they lose their jobs anyway? Oh, and probably their insurance with it?

Not saying there's an easy answer either way, but continuing on as normal won't address those issues, either.

Some will, but less so if we take reasonable measures vs full on shutdown. 

I don't even see how a full shutdown would work. Do we have the infrastructure to magically deliver food to people stuck in their homes for weeks at a time?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jenksismyhero said:

This is a bit narrow-minded. You can't expect 100% of people to stop making a living. Isn't the stat like 1/4 of the country doesn't have vacation time and are paid hourly?

If you can’t expect that, then you can expect a few million deaths. We can’t fix that problem now, we have to treat the emergency situation.

Figure the rest out once we have limited the explosion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ptatc said:

As long as travel and such are limited it will have a greater effect. It will still limit it especially if large groups are avoided. There is no way to absolutely stop it but containing the spread it the goal. There will be cells pop up and containing that is the key.

Most colleges are extending break, making break earlier and doing online classes for 2 weeks after. Essentially that limits many large gatherings until mid-April. we'll see how that limits it going forward. 

Unless there’s an effect of heat, it won’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Balta1701 said:

If you had perhaps supported me a week and a half ago when I argued for major travel shutdowns I might agree. But now? It’s everywhere. If you have people going to the store in Pierre South Dakota, or going to work in St Louis, they will pass it along. 

It's going to get everywhere but limiting it is the key. Things like the avoiding the large groups like the colleges and sporting events will help as well. It's the shutdowns I have issue with totally shutting down won't stop it either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ptatc said:

It's going to get everywhere but limiting it is the key. Things like the avoiding the large groups like the colleges and sporting events will help as well. It's the shutdowns I have issue with totally shutting down won't stop it either. 

Then we needed to act far more aggressively a week ago. If people are living their lives right now and doing anything other than social distancing, the exponential growth will continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ptatc said:

It will limit the spreading. It won't stop it but I don't think anything will stop it. 

If you’re doubling every 4 days versus every 6 days, You still wind up in the same place.  Limiting isn’t enough, you have to fully break the exponential trend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Balta1701 said:

If you can’t expect that, then you can expect a few million deaths. We can’t fix that problem now, we have to treat the emergency situation.

Figure the rest out once we have limited the explosion.

How many millions died as a result of the great depression? If this is where a total shutdown gets us - which is what you seem to be advocating for -  what's the point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jenksismyhero said:

This is a bit narrow-minded. You can't expect 100% of people to stop making a living. Isn't the stat like 1/4 of the country doesn't have vacation time and are paid hourly?

My guy, my company has lost 10 million dollars in 5 days! No one will be making a living if this extends out over months and businesses are impacted over that time.

I would rather cease operations for a couple weeks to get things in line and then begin the recovery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Balta1701 said:

Then we needed to act far more aggressively a week ago. If people are living their lives right now and doing anything other than social distancing, the exponential growth will continue.

Can't change the past. We need to work on what we can now. The cases will continue. People should not be living their lives as before. The washing hands and taking precautions is key as well as the social distancing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jenksismyhero said:

How many millions died as a result of the great depression? If this is where a total shutdown gets us - which is what you seem to be advocating for -  what's the point?

The economy is not going to improve as long as things continue to progress. The economy has only gotten worse, not better. If you allow this to happen over 4 months, you're talking about a recession that takes years to recover from. 

If we all accept the bleeding today, up front, for the next few weeks the recovery can start sooner.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...