Jump to content
caulfield12

COVID-19/Coronavirus thread

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Quin said:

Jerksticks, take this here. 

We have a fatality rate from a known sample size. It's what we can act off of at the moment. It is a large sample size. It's much better thought our then throwing your hands in the air and going "but it might be different!"

Cfr and IFR are different things and unsurprisingly epidemiologists have developed methods for estimating infection rates! Every bit of data we have says this thing isn't very widespread yet at all, and that's backed up by the models.

Pretending it's "completely unknown" is just a way to not admit early ideas that this had already infected tens of millions of Americans was completely wrong, and a way to continue to say we don't need to worry about it going forward

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Quin said:

Jerksticks, take this here. 

We have a fatality rate from a known sample size. It's what we can act off of at the moment. It is a large sample size. It's much better thought our then throwing your hands in the air and going "but it might be different!"

The problem is that it is also a near statistical certainty that we have been under-counting deaths as well.  We know from comparing mortality numbers to historic mortality numbers, that there are a large number of deaths that we can't explain, in states that we know have had outbreaks.  We also know that there are below average mortality rates in states where there haven't been outbreaks so the whole they are committing suicide trope isn't really working there either, otherwise they wouldn't be below normal.  It is very clear in these studies that we are not getting the whole picture for COVID cases or deaths, and that is 100% what the government wants so it has the cover to send everyone back to the slaughter, oops I mean work.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, almagest said:

US coronavirus deaths down 87% from high in April - 2693 on April 21 to 363 on June 22 per Worldometers:

 

 

Screen Shot 2020-06-23 at 6.06.56 PM.png

If the trend doesn’t jump back up to 500-750, probably even 1,000/day in the next 2-4 weeks, it would be shocking.
 

A better handle on how to treat critical patients, more protections for vulnerable populations, underreporting and playing games with state numbers and the fact that many of those at the highest risk have already died are all part of this.

Cases in countries that had suboptimal initial reactions are trending way down, across the EU, even the UK and Sweden.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, southsideirish71 said:

The last semester of education was a joke.  They might as well not have school if this is what its going to be.  My son is taking a bunch of AP classes including Calc, Physics and Robotics.  That will be nearly useless if its a zoom once every few days with a bunch of home work is the schedule just like last semester.  The pass/fail shit is stupid as well because it doesnt help those trying to get academic scholarships when their GPA and all the hard work they have put in gets neutered by randomness.    High School is a sprint to college.  At this point if they close down school again this fall.  I will just pick up and move to somewhere where my kids can actually get an education.  Not glorified babysitting service where the teacher gets to check in every few days.   They are not ready nor will they be for a online curriculum.  

Let me ask you this. Whose fault is it for the experience your son has had? The teachers, the administrators or someone else? Because it damn well better not be the teachers with what they are working with. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, NorthSideSox72 said:

We aren't going to eliminate the virus in the US (at least not for years anyway). The goal was, is and still should be, to keep the country safe enough that the medical systems are not overwhelmed. And by keeping it tamped down to that level you also save a bunch of lives and buy time for better treatments and eventually a vaccine.

Illinois has done this, and done it really well. In fact I actually feel some pride when I see how well our state has done compared to others. And what that means is, we are safe enough for this Phase 4 of reopening - and the schools 100% need to open with it. You can't do one without the other for a whole host of reasons. I want to see the schools opened up fully in the fall.

Now, obviously if some massive spike occurs, and ICU beds and ventilators go near maxed out and infection rates are out of control, then you go back a step. Hopefully that doesn't happen but it could. And in that case, you go back a step on ALL of it - if you close the schools, you close down all non-essential services too.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/coronavirus/ct-coronavirus-illinois-reopening-schools-20200623-c64n76ssijf6jccnaqoethe2ce-story.html

Every school district, college and university will be asked to develop their own reopening plan, Gov. J.B. Pritzker said.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chisoxfn said:
3 hours ago, Chisoxfn said:

So we really are just going to stop testing and identifying who is positive?  Is this really what our great nation has came to. We are just going to bury our heads in the sand and give up.  I can't get over how significantly the US has failed relative to the vast majority of developed countries we historically claimed to be superior to.  Unbelievable and just sad. Even if we get lucky and the ignore it and test less strategy works...it will only because of sheer luck of the virus going away. It will not because of any actual skill or strategic insights, it is just because we have demonstrated a clear inability as a nation to come together and actually respond to challenging circumstances.  Instead we have decided that politics matter more than what is right.  

“I told them, let’s slow the testing down please.” Don’t care if he said he was joking.

Edited by The Beast

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chisoxfn said:

I've always said he's a pathetic leader, I've also said the left attacked him for everything he did, vs. focus on the big things that mattered that a dynamic was created that a broader swath of the right could actually believe what Trump says when he leverages the liberal media and the far left conspiracy theory.  That in and of itself was a massive failure of the democratic party and the left which swung so far the other direction they indirectly created a larger pocket than they ever expected which would blindly follow Trump (which has always amazed me - just look at every post I've pretty much made on Trump).  

In the past, he said lots of stupid stuff on CoronaVirus, but it felt more like him trying to say things to detract from the fact that they just couldn't get as much done as they could have or should have. In this case, it really officially sounds like they have totally given up, which I guess as I type this, I don't really know what is worse...neither is good but I always say leadership is a two way street and there is just so little leadership to go around politics these days. Everyone is just using everything to feast on others for their own damn agenda vs. the true good of the people.  

Not with the nominee and most moderates in congress...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Yearnin' for Yermin said:

I'm not a Trump fan. All I ask is that the media and others treat him fairly. There's plenty to criticize him over. They just need to do it fairly.

 
Tap & Hold to Copy GIF
giphy.gif
Edited by The Beast
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, StrangeSox said:

Not sure how schools do lunches.

No more than 50 kids gathered at a time? My wife's school has multiple lunch periods with 350 kids each. 

All the elementary schools in our district (three of them, District 28) have no cafeterias. They eat their lunches in their classrooms generally, but sometimes in the gym by grade level. I don't think that change is going to be the biggest issue. It's going to be more purely classroom size, I believe.

We are lucky in that our district has pretty small class sizes. Elementary classrooms are ranging 14 to 18 typically in our district, and if you add in that some parents will be keeping kids home for health or other reasons until Phase 5, we are very lucky that our schools can probably do the 15 or fewer thing without a ton of problems. I recognize that in some other districts it will be a very different story.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, The Beast said:

Let me ask you this. Whose fault is it for the experience your son has had? The teachers, the administrators or someone else? Because it damn well better not be the teachers with what they are working with. 

My school district gives out ipads and there is zero paper footprint.  They were submitting homework and taking exams in class via the ipad before Covid.  They had an advantage over most.  So who is at fault?  The one zoom every other day for each class is okay?  Some classes had no tests for the entire quarter?  Some didnt want to give grades besides Pass/Fail? How hard is it to figure that out.  So what is your wifes school district doing right now as we speak to prepare for online education.   You cant just show up in August and go woe is me we are still not prepared.  Are you going to tackle teachers needing to be on video conferencing for the better part of the day.  Are you going to be able to provide adequate testing to validate learning.  Is it going to be engaging and with instruction that is preparing for college.  Because to be honest if this is what we are getting then they can furlough a bunch of the teachers and just have a hall monitor collect homework and take attendance.   The current online education is worthless.  My son was able to do his entire days worth of homework in under 20 minutes.  His lowest grade was a 99 for the quarter.   He slept after he completed his homework until 2pm everyday.  The only time he needed to get up was to attend the occasional zoom.  His GPA was already a 4.  But this is not preparing him for college when he will be challenged and will be behind.  I dont want a participation award medal.  I want him prepared for college to get the best opportunity to be successful in life. My wife works at a school district and they are doing shit right now to prepare for the fall.   I think they believe this is just going to go away.  I dont see anyone preparing an online curriculum.  To do a true online testing program will require some of the students "rights" to be given up when their device is monitored.   And this pass/fail stuff is nonsense.  Challenge for a grade or just extend vacation until there is a cure.  The online side is not education, its a glorified check box to prove that someone is ready for the next grade.   

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, NorthSideSox72 said:

All the elementary schools in our district (three of them, District 28) have no cafeterias. They eat their lunches in their classrooms generally, but sometimes in the gym by grade level. I don't think that change is going to be the biggest issue. It's going to be more purely classroom size, I believe.

We are lucky in that our district has pretty small class sizes. Elementary classrooms are ranging 14 to 18 typically in our district, and if you add in that some parents will be keeping kids home for health or other reasons until Phase 5, we are very lucky that our schools can probably do the 15 or fewer thing without a ton of problems. I recognize that in some other districts it will be a very different story.

 

My wife averaged 35 kids in seventh grade last year.

Her district has 3 or 4 lunchroom supervisors for those 350 kids. If you now put those kids in classrooms, that's an additional 7+ teachers who now have supervisory duty that period but still need their prep and lunch periods. Becomes a huge scheduling challenge, maybe not solvable.

 

There's over 800 districts in this state and each one is unique in some way or the other. The state can't and shouldn't impose a single plan on them all, but it seems like they're all kinda on their own now with minimal actual guidance on what to do in a situation none of them has faxed before. It's a hard challenge for everyone, including students and parents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, southsideirish71 said:

My school district gives out ipads and there is zero paper footprint.  They were submitting homework and taking exams in class via the ipad before Covid.  They had an advantage over most.  So who is at fault?  The one zoom every other day for each class is okay?  Some classes had no tests for the entire quarter?  Some didnt want to give grades besides Pass/Fail? How hard is it to figure that out.  So what is your wifes school district doing right now as we speak to prepare for online education.   You cant just show up in August and go woe is me we are still not prepared.  Are you going to tackle teachers needing to be on video conferencing for the better part of the day.  Are you going to be able to provide adequate testing to validate learning.  Is it going to be engaging and with instruction that is preparing for college.  Because to be honest if this is what we are getting then they can furlough a bunch of the teachers and just have a hall monitor collect homework and take attendance.   The current online education is worthless.  My son was able to do his entire days worth of homework in under 20 minutes.  His lowest grade was a 99 for the quarter.   He slept after he completed his homework until 2pm everyday.  The only time he needed to get up was to attend the occasional zoom.  His GPA was already a 4.  But this is not preparing him for college when he will be challenged and will be behind.  I dont want a participation award medal.  I want him prepared for college to get the best opportunity to be successful in life. My wife works at a school district and they are doing shit right now to prepare for the fall.   I think they believe this is just going to go away.  I dont see anyone preparing an online curriculum.  To do a true online testing program will require some of the students "rights" to be given up when their device is monitored.   And this pass/fail stuff is nonsense.  Challenge for a grade or just extend vacation until there is a cure.  The online side is not education, its a glorified check box to prove that someone is ready for the next grade.   

First of all, given the level of classes he is at and the likelihood of success with that kind of STEM mind, I think he will be successful.

Is it fair that you fault the district and not necessarily the teachers? If so, that is fair. If not, and you blame the teachers, that isn’t entirely fair. They had close to zero time to prepare for online learning. I would agree that video classrooms throughout the day would be better than online exams and homework, but I don’t know if that is up to the district, the school or the department. 

As far as the pass/fail, I think that was mandated by the state if I remember what my wife said correctly. If not, then it had to be the district. I would much rather kids get punished for cheating and take some accountability or actually do their homework, when many of them didn’t until the last few weeks and begged to have their grades rounded up. 

I don’t really know who should be at fault to be honest. But I don’t necessarily think it is the teachers who were at fault in the spring. I would agree with you that some sort of effective plan needs to be in place for the fall, with zoom calls, staggered classes by kids in each level, four day weeks or a hybrid approach being in place.

I can also appreciate a father like you caring about his son’s education. At least you provided some good reasons rather than the usual garbage I see on social media thrown at teachers, usually without any rational, coherent thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, The Beast said:

First of all, given the level of classes he is at and the likelihood of success with that kind of STEM mind, I think he will be successful.

Is it fair that you fault the district and not necessarily the teachers? If so, that is fair. If not, and you blame the teachers, that isn’t entirely fair. They had close to zero time to prepare for online learning. I would agree that video classrooms throughout the day would be better than online exams and homework, but I don’t know if that is up to the district, the school or the department. 

As far as the pass/fail, I think that was mandated by the state if I remember what my wife said correctly. If not, then it had to be the district. I would much rather kids get punished for cheating and take some accountability or actually do their homework, when many of them didn’t until the last few weeks and begged to have their grades rounded up. 

I don’t really know who should be at fault to be honest. But I don’t necessarily think it is the teachers who were at fault in the spring. I would agree with you that some sort of effective plan needs to be in place for the fall, with zoom calls, staggered classes by kids in each level, four day weeks or a hybrid approach being in place.

I can also appreciate a father like you caring about his son’s education. At least you provided some good reasons rather than the usual garbage I see on social media thrown at teachers, usually without any rational, coherent thoughts.

I do fault teachers 50-70 (and I’m on the very bottom end of that spectrum) for just sticking their head in the sand and refusing to adapt to or at least be open to the benefits of modern technology applications (which will be critical to future career success for both students and teachers.)

Having taught four years in the Kansas City, MO, public school district, this might be an issue with a significant number.

It’s up to to every veteran teacher to utilize their experience to help younger teachers with classroom management, and not just mail it in when retirement age is nearing.  The tenure situation provides too much protection in the US, but if that is eroded or negotiated away, there also needs to be some significant “carrots” or in incentives provided as well.  Otherwise, we’ll end up like Russia or a banana republic in the not too distant future, with grade bribes for teachers to supplement low salaries and diminishing pension security.  Of course, the education of wealthy/elites will be continuing pretty much as normal. 
 

I would also argue the downstream learning impact on pre-K, K-6 is even more dramatic.  My son hasn’t been in school since January, and won’t return until late August.  Thankfully, he started full-time KG at age 3, so the effects should be mitigated somewhat.

 

 

Edited by caulfield12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, StrangeSox said:

My wife averaged 35 kids in seventh grade last year.

Her district has 3 or 4 lunchroom supervisors for those 350 kids. If you now put those kids in classrooms, that's an additional 7+ teachers who now have supervisory duty that period but still need their prep and lunch periods. Becomes a huge scheduling challenge, maybe not solvable.

 

There's over 800 districts in this state and each one is unique in some way or the other. The state can't and shouldn't impose a single plan on them all, but it seems like they're all kinda on their own now with minimal actual guidance on what to do in a situation none of them has faxed before. It's a hard challenge for everyone, including students and parents.

35 kids per classroom? I mean I know the numbers go up in Jr High (my sampling was most recently in 5th and 2nd grades), but that seems insanely high to me.

Anyway, back on the central topic - the schools are going to have a very hard time with all of this, but I just do not think e-schooling is a real solution unless we see some enormous explosion in COVID deaths and have no choice but to shut it all down again. Barring that, get the kids into school, even if their days will be pretty weird for a while.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, StrangeSox said:

My wife averaged 35 kids in seventh grade last year.

Her district has 3 or 4 lunchroom supervisors for those 350 kids. If you now put those kids in classrooms, that's an additional 7+ teachers who now have supervisory duty that period but still need their prep and lunch periods. Becomes a huge scheduling challenge, maybe not solvable.

 

There's over 800 districts in this state and each one is unique in some way or the other. The state can't and shouldn't impose a single plan on them all, but it seems like they're all kinda on their own now with minimal actual guidance on what to do in a situation none of them has faxed before. It's a hard challenge for everyone, including students and parents.

This is why I would like to see the state suspend their requirements on PE (I can't remember if it's only high school with the 4 year req). That frees up a huge space to use for additional lunch room but also frees up additional personnel. But I don't know that an individual school district could make that decision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, southsideirish71 said:

My school district gives out ipads and there is zero paper footprint.  They were submitting homework and taking exams in class via the ipad before Covid.  They had an advantage over most.  So who is at fault?  The one zoom every other day for each class is okay?  Some classes had no tests for the entire quarter?  Some didnt want to give grades besides Pass/Fail? How hard is it to figure that out.  So what is your wifes school district doing right now as we speak to prepare for online education.   You cant just show up in August and go woe is me we are still not prepared.  Are you going to tackle teachers needing to be on video conferencing for the better part of the day.  Are you going to be able to provide adequate testing to validate learning.  Is it going to be engaging and with instruction that is preparing for college.  Because to be honest if this is what we are getting then they can furlough a bunch of the teachers and just have a hall monitor collect homework and take attendance.   The current online education is worthless.  My son was able to do his entire days worth of homework in under 20 minutes.  His lowest grade was a 99 for the quarter.   He slept after he completed his homework until 2pm everyday.  The only time he needed to get up was to attend the occasional zoom.  His GPA was already a 4.  But this is not preparing him for college when he will be challenged and will be behind.  I dont want a participation award medal.  I want him prepared for college to get the best opportunity to be successful in life. My wife works at a school district and they are doing shit right now to prepare for the fall.   I think they believe this is just going to go away.  I dont see anyone preparing an online curriculum.  To do a true online testing program will require some of the students "rights" to be given up when their device is monitored.   And this pass/fail stuff is nonsense.  Challenge for a grade or just extend vacation until there is a cure.  The online side is not education, its a glorified check box to prove that someone is ready for the next grade.   

I remember when I was in HS there were a lot of days I would have zero homework. I got mostly B's and C's so 20 minutes of homework sounds about right. I was there for about 6.5 hours and I'd say at least 50% of it was filled with stuff like lunch, gym class, passing periods, sitting in class taking attendance or in some elective class like shop or keyboarding (early 90's) or a computer class where there was little to no homework.

The other 50% was sitting in a class listening to the teacher and learning/memorizing a few things long enough to pass the test and them forgetting them later on. 

Now in the real world my job is literally pass/fail. Either I do my job correctly or I don't have a job anymore. If I have questions or don't know how to do something I "cheat" by asking someone else for help or looking up a solution online. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some people heading into the Trump-Phoenix rally said they were not concerned about catching the virus because they thought published statistics were bogus.  Yet, many Trump fans watch Fox News. Recently Fox aired a report of a fast food place supposedly attempting to poison New York City policemen by tampering with their milk shakes. There was no truth to the story, but Fox, as always, didn't fact-check the story and ran with things anyway. And knowing Fox, it didn't care how wrong they were. They accomplished what they wanted with the false report.

Many who cry "Fake News" don't know what fake news really is, especially when it come to the virus. This ignorance only makes things worse.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, caulfield12 said:

If the trend doesn’t jump back up to 500-750, probably even 1,000/day in the next 2-4 weeks, it would be shocking.

The trend shows a slight bump back up is likely so I'd agree on 500-750 short-term, but the overall trend means 1000/day is very unlikely. There's nothing going on that would indicate a return to these numbers. We just had giant outdoor protests with people smushed together a few weeks ago and the death rate didn't climb., plus the infected population is moving away from the elderly and at-risk and to younger, healthier people as the lockdowns lift.

Quote

More protections for vulnerable populations

the fact that many of those at the highest risk have already died

Unfortunately, yes. State and local governments did a TERRIBLE job protecting at-risk populations. Absolutely criminal - for example Minnesota had 81% of their deaths in nursing homes. New Jersey 45%.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My daughter is in 1st grade at a Catholic school, and I have no doubt her teacher worked much harder in the spring than she would have in a normal year.  She (again, 1st grade) and 6-7 zoom meetings a week, online coursework to do, as well as her normal allotment of homework.  I would say she easily had 5-6 hours of work to do per day.  Her teacher had all assignments and coursework posted by 5am every morning.  She was hosting the zooms, she was available for talking to the kids and parents.  She was fantastic.  My daughter had additional Spanish assignments posted every week, and even her gym teacher would post exercises and things like that on their google classroom page.  I think her school did a tremendous job, and I think her workload got her to, at least pretty much where she would have been if she had been in the classroom.  

Thankfully, though, at least for now, the dioceses has said that the schools will be open in the fall.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump administration is ending support to  13 Covid 19 testing sites across the country, 7 in Texas. Now the lackeys looking the other way is going to kill people. That this actually happens in America during a pandemic should stun everyone.

Edited by Dick Allen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, NorthSideSox72 said:

35 kids per classroom? I mean I know the numbers go up in Jr High (my sampling was most recently in 5th and 2nd grades), but that seems insanely high to me.

Anyway, back on the central topic - the schools are going to have a very hard time with all of this, but I just do not think e-schooling is a real solution unless we see some enormous explosion in COVID deaths and have no choice but to shut it all down again. Barring that, get the kids into school, even if their days will be pretty weird for a while.

 

one of my colleagues is dealing with this right now - he had a major, unknown virus about 8 years ago, nearly died, wound up with permanent issues because of it. Even if Texas was as under-control as Illinois, his kids couldn't go because they can't risk bringing something back to him. So for your state, you also have to have some version of an e-schooling option available, because otherwise kids with familial issues like that will all be homeschooled. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, almagest said:

The trend shows a slight bump back up is likely so I'd agree on 500-750 short-term, but the overall trend means 1000/day is very unlikely. There's nothing going on that would indicate a return to these numbers. We just had giant outdoor protests with people smushed together a few weeks ago and the death rate didn't climb., plus the infected population is moving away from the elderly and at-risk and to younger, healthier people as the lockdowns lift.

Unfortunately, yes. State and local governments did a TERRIBLE job protecting at-risk populations. Absolutely criminal - for example Minnesota had 81% of their deaths in nursing homes. New Jersey 45%.

 

And who do you think was bringing it to the nursing homes?  How about those employees who get to go out  into public where people aren't protecting themselves and each other?  How about the contractors who deliver food and medical supplies to those facilities?  How about the families who visit loved ones because someone told them this is just a hoax and only as bad as a normal flu?

Long Term Care facilities are a great example of why stopping the spread on macro level is so important to stopping it on the mirco-level.  It isn't just about protecting healthy people.  It is about limiting the number of unhealthy people who are around people who can't psychically handle this illness.  Every single extra exposure is a chance at a case.  Every extra case is an extra chance at exposing an exponential  number of people based on how public people feel safe to be around.  Sure this might not be a big deal for you to catch.  But if you don't care and catch it, there is a chance you expose the health care worker who works in the facility taking care of my mom.  Every additional layer of people you introduce multiplies the odds of someone else catching this exponentialy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, almagest said:

The trend shows a slight bump back up is likely so I'd agree on 500-750 short-term, but the overall trend means 1000/day is very unlikely. There's nothing going on that would indicate a return to these numbers. We just had giant outdoor protests with people smushed together a few weeks ago and the death rate didn't climb., plus the infected population is moving away from the elderly and at-risk and to younger, healthier people as the lockdowns lift.

Unfortunately, yes. State and local governments did a TERRIBLE job protecting at-risk populations. Absolutely criminal - for example Minnesota had 81% of their deaths in nursing homes. New Jersey 45%.

 

Florida and California on Wednesday reported record high one-day tallies for new confirmed coronavirus cases at 5,508 and 7,149, respectively. Arizona on Wednesday saw another 1,795 positive cases after adding a record 3,591 on Tuesday. In Texas, Houston Mayor Sylvestor Turner said that the city’s intensive care units were at 97% of capacity, according to a Twitter post from a Houston city councilwoman.

Meanwhile, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced Wednesday that travelers to New York, New Jersey and Connecticut coming from Covid-19 hot spots would be subject to a 14-day quarantine.

“The latest coronavirus news is not positive for the stock market which was betting the worst of the pandemic recession was behind us,” Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist for MUFG Union Bank, said in an email. “All the hopes of investors looking for a better economy to improve the bottom lines of companies shut down in the recession have been dashed. Forget about the fears of the virus coming back in the fall, the number of new cases and hospitalizations in states like Arizona, Texas, and Florida says the threat is happening right now.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said during an appearance before the House Energy and Commerce Committee Tuesday that the “next couple of weeks are going to be critical” in containing the virus in states in the South and West where surges have appeared.

Still, state and local officials have so far largely tabled the idea of shutting down their state economies again, with Texas Gov. Greg Abott saying that a new lockdown would be the last option. Fauci also added during his testimony that states might not require going back into “an absolute lockdown” to contend with the latest rise in cases.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-market-news-live-june-24-2020-221938970.html

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, caulfield12 said:

Florida and California on Wednesday reported record high one-day tallies for new confirmed coronavirus cases at 5,508 and 7,149, respectively. Arizona on Wednesday saw another 1,795 positive cases after adding a record 3,591 on Tuesday. In Texas, Houston Mayor Sylvestor Turner said that the city’s intensive care units were at 97% of capacity, according to a Twitter post from a Houston city councilwoman.

Meanwhile, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced Wednesday that travelers to New York, New Jersey and Connecticut coming from Covid-19 hot spots would be subject to a 14-day quarantine.

“The latest coronavirus news is not positive for the stock market which was betting the worst of the pandemic recession was behind us,” Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist for MUFG Union Bank, said in an email. “All the hopes of investors looking for a better economy to improve the bottom lines of companies shut down in the recession have been dashed. Forget about the fears of the virus coming back in the fall, the number of new cases and hospitalizations in states like Arizona, Texas, and Florida says the threat is happening right now.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said during an appearance before the House Energy and Commerce Committee Tuesday that the “next couple of weeks are going to be critical” in containing the virus in states in the South and West where surges have appeared.

Still, state and local officials have so far largely tabled the idea of shutting down their state economies again, with Texas Gov. Greg Abott saying that a new lockdown would be the last option. Fauci also added during his testimony that states might not require going back into “an absolute lockdown” to contend with the latest rise in cases.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-market-news-live-june-24-2020-221938970.html

 

What were the tallies in the week leading up? Did it just explode on Wednesday out of nowhere? Why hasn't the death rate also been increasing as the number of confirmed cases increased?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

And who do you think was bringing it to the nursing homes? 

Primarily elderly people sick with COVID being put back into them. Example: https://townhall.com/columnists/michaelbarone/2020/05/15/who-sent-covid19-positive-patients-into-nursing-homes-n2568837

Edited by almagest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×