Jump to content

FS: 40 Man Roster Decisions and Rule 5 Draft Implications


Y2Jimmy0
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, YourWhatHurts said:

Burger will definitely be protected.  The other 3 maybe not.

I know that Burger is more worthy of a roster spot than Seby Zavala, Bernardo Flores, Ruiz, etc.  The others I am not so sure about.

Didn’t Portillos suggest Burger wouldn’t be?  I don’t think Johnson will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

I still don’t get why the wouldn’t protect him.  There is plenty of space on the 40 man roster to add him, Sheets, & Johnson.

Why waste a slot protecting someone who won't get picked?  Who out there is going to put this kid on a roster for all of next year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

Why waste a slot protecting someone who won't get picked?  Who out there is going to put this kid on a roster for all of next year?

I could see Oakland taking him and it working out.

A team in tank mode would take him as he is cheap and a high draft pick who has been out for a couple of years for injury.  Why not take him?   He is not a pitcher who had surgery and may not be the same.  

He has a good hit tool.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Y2Jimmy0 said:

I'm expecting Tyler Johnson and Gavin Sheets to get protected. 

Johnson I could see, as he is essentially major league ready, or close enough to it that you can mix and match with him to get through a season.  Sheets?  Again, I just don't see it.  If he played a premium defensive position, I could even see it, but even if you get their bat going, you are taking a DH/1B type, which aren't that hard to find.  I can't see teams wanting a dead roster spot to get a guy like that through a whole season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harry Chappas said:

I could see Oakland taking him and it working out.

A team in tank mode would take him as he is cheap and a high draft pick who has been out for a couple of years for injury.  Why not take him?   He is not a pitcher who had surgery and may not be the same.  

He has a good hit tool.

 

 

 

He'd get murdered in the big leagues. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harry Chappas said:

I could see Oakland taking him and it working out.

A team in tank mode would take him as he is cheap and a high draft pick who has been out for a couple of years for injury.  Why not take him?   He is not a pitcher who had surgery and may not be the same.  

He has a good hit tool.

 

 

 

This is actually the best argument against picking him.  You are talking about taking up a roster spot for an entire season for a guy who hasn't seen a competitive pitch in years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harry Chappas said:

I could see Oakland taking him and it working out.

A team in tank mode would take him as he is cheap and a high draft pick who has been out for a couple of years for injury.  Why not take him?   He is not a pitcher who had surgery and may not be the same.  

He has a good hit tool.

 

 

 

How do you know that?  He hasn't played in a game since 2017 and that was in low A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will predict Sheets is left off.  Why?  Because they will believe he will not get picked, because other teams will see him as an underdeveloped 1B who provides no positional flexibility,  so they won't put him on the 40 because that will markedly decrease his already limited trade value.  I think Johnson will get added but his spot will be more of a placeholder spot and will immediately be in jeopardy if the Sox break camp without him on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

This is actually the best argument against picking him.  You are talking about taking up a roster spot for an entire season for a guy who hasn't seen a competitive pitch in years.

That is true enough normally but we don't know on Nov 20 what things will be like in April in May.  There may again be expanded rosters etc.  It's a small amount of money to take him.  If I'm the Cubs I pick Burger for sure.  They have shit on the roster they can dump and the chance at looking at him to see if he's better than one of the many retreads in camp is worth the money, because those guys have zero trade value, but a rehabilitated Burger will at least have some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, YourWhatHurts said:

That is true enough normally but we don't know on Nov 20 what things will be like in April in May.  There may again be expanded rosters etc.  It's a small amount of money to take him.  If I'm the Cubs I pick Burger for sure.  They have shit on the roster they can dump and the chance at looking at him to see if he's better than one of the many retreads in camp is worth the money, because those guys have zero trade value, but a rehabilitated Burger will at least have some.

The Cubs are going to take up a spot on a potential playoff roster for a poor mans Kyle Schwarber?  I can't see it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

The Cubs are going to take up a spot on a potential playoff roster for a poor mans Kyle Schwarber?  I can't see it.

1) Reading the tea leaves, the Cubs are not going to be looking at the playoffs next year.

2) Schwarber very well could be nontendered or traded in a salary dump

3) If it's a 28-30 man roster with a bunch of garbage on it anyway, who cares?

4) It's hard to say Burger's ceiling is a poor man's Schwarber seeing as how he has turned out to this point.  He'll never have the raw power but he could be a better pure hitter for all we know.

5) They only risk is losing the claiming fee.  The potential gain is 6 years of a quality hitter for free.

6) In theory, they can still trade him mid-season to another team willing to stash him for the rest of the season.

7) It's reinsdorf so you know the he's rooting for the claim anyway; he wants that $100K or whatever it is back in his pocket.

Even if it's a long shot, I think teams should take chances in the Rule 5 more often.  The money is really negligible when you think about the value of 6 years of a good player for free.  Especially again in a situation where there may be expanded rosters anyway. 

Edited by YourWhatHurts
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I am not sure why the risk is worth it to the Sox to leave him off.  They really aren't in that "roster crunch of great talent" that people feared because so many quality-looking players busted and/or got hurt and/or ceased developing on track.  Basabe, Medeiros, etc.  There are still several spots on this roster than can be cleared even on top of the already-avaialable space.  Risking losing Burger to keep Bernardo Flores or Seby Zavala for example is a pretty stupid move IMO.  The Sox aren't going to need all of this space on the 40 for FAs.  The great majority of the club is already on the 40.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, YourWhatHurts said:

1) Reading the tea leaves, the Cubs are not going to be looking at the playoffs next year.

2) Schwarber very well could be nontendered or traded in a salary dump

3) If it's a 28-30 man roster with a bunch of garbage on it anyway, who cares?

4) It's hard to say Burger's ceiling is a poor man's Schwarber seeing as how he has turned out to this point.  He'll never have the raw power but he could be a better pure hitter for all we know.

5) They only risk is losing the claiming fee.  The potential gain is 6 years of a quality hitter for free.

6) In theory, they can still trade him mid-season to another team willing to stash him for the rest of the season.

7) It's reinsdorf so you know the he's rooting for the claim anyway; he wants that $100K or whatever it is back in his pocket.

Even if it's a long shot, I think teams should take chances in the Rule 5 more often.  The money is really negligible when you think about the value of 6 years of a good player for free.  Especially again in a situation where there may be expanded rosters anyway. 

That is a LOT of ifs to hold up for a guy that isn't going to be ready to be a major leaguer on 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chicago White Sox said:

I still don’t get why the wouldn’t protect him.  There is plenty of space on the 40 man roster to add him, Sheets, & Johnson.

He'd be more likely to be taken off waivers when he has to be cleared to make room on the forty man. Can't really afford to carry anyone on the 40 you don't expect to help out in '21.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...