manbearpuig 1,448 Posted January 21 Just now, SoCalChiSox said: Jimmy, whats the damage? Whats the compensation going to MIL? Is Vaughn/Kopech involved? @Y2Jimmy0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maloney.adam 364 Posted January 21 7 minutes ago, YourWhatHurts said: IMO, sign Tanaka for $15M. Just suck it up and spend the few extra dollars. I don’t want to disappoint you, but the Sox aren’t going to sign Tanaka. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chicago White Sox 5,790 Posted January 21 5 minutes ago, manbearpuig said: @Y2Jimmy0 1 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turnin' two 985 Posted January 21 9 minutes ago, SoCalChiSox said: Jimmy, whats the damage? Whats the compensation going to MIL? Is Vaughn/Kopech involved? Obviously I'm not him, but he has stated several times that the Sox aren't trading Kopech, Vaughn or Crochet. 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HakunaMachado 48 Posted January 21 1 minute ago, turnin' two said: Obviously I'm not him, but he has stated several times that the Sox aren't trading Kopech, Vaughn or Crochet. So what is our best guess of what a deal looks like at this point? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turnin' two 985 Posted January 21 My best guess is that it doesn't make sense for the Brewers to trade one of their best young players for anything less than a couple of the Sox best prospects. And since the Sox don't want to part with those prospects, a deal doesn't get done. But, disclaimer, I'm an idiot. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SoCalChiSox 360 Posted January 21 Just now, turnin' two said: Obviously I'm not him, but he has stated several times that the Sox aren't trading Kopech, Vaughn or Crochet. There was the suggestion (not by Jimmy but rather I think maybe Harold) that Kelley and Madrigal was not going to be enough and so there would be other headliners so I am really concerned about that. I get La Stella isn't gonna come if Madrigal is still there, but I'd say I wish they took Q at 1/8 because even Kelley is probably going to be a painful loss down the road. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turnin' two 985 Posted January 21 3 minutes ago, SoCalChiSox said: There was the suggestion (not by Jimmy but rather I think maybe Harold) that Kelley and Madrigal was not going to be enough and so there would be other headliners so I am really concerned about that. I get La Stella isn't gonna come if Madrigal is still there, but I'd say I wish they took Q at 1/8 because even Kelley is probably going to be a painful loss down the road. Even Cubs level Quintana would have been pretty darn good as a 4 starter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iWiN4PreP 613 Posted January 21 (edited) so we are at 24 pages 24 hours after a random dude on reddit confidently claimed burnes to chicago and we have nothing substantial to burn the fires other than the fact that the White Sox are watching SPs go off the board and foodies making cryptic tweets to sound like they were on top of things too im a bit bummed so far. Edited January 21 by iWiN4PreP 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jerksticks 624 Posted January 21 30 minutes ago, YourWhatHurts said: I guess I will say this: if the Sox make a stupid deal that bites them in the ass hard for next several years, because once again they fail to properly evaluate their own in-house talent, then I would rather they make that deal with the Brewers than any other team in baseball. If they trade one or several of my favorite Sox prospects, it will be much more fun at least half-rooting for them in Milwaukee instead of purely lamenting their losses and hating the Sox FO more and more every time they do something really good. Hadn’t thought of this angle. Well said. There isn’t a better destination. I forgot how great it was knowing that CLee was OPSing like 1.200 or whatever against the cubs. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Orlando 1,416 Posted January 21 6 minutes ago, iWiN4PreP said: so we are at 24 pages 24 hours after a random dude on reddit confidently claimed burnes to chicago and we have nothing substantial to burn the fires other than the fact that the White Sox are watching SPs go off the board and foodies making cryptic tweets to sound like they were on top of things too im a bit bummed so far. Take out the foodies if you don’t believe in them but James Fox (whom we all trust) has confirmed that Burnes is a target and he has heard it from his sources. I think that’s enough to say this is a real possibility. The question is, is it really done? Not even the foodies have claimed that. Only the Reddit guy has. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chicago White Sox 5,790 Posted January 21 2 minutes ago, Orlando said: Take out the foodies if you don’t believe in them but James Fox (whom we all trust) has confirmed that Burnes is a target and he has heard it from his sources. I think that’s enough to say this is a real possibility. The question is, is it really done? Not even the foodies have claimed that. Only the Reddit guy has. Has the Reddit guy posted anything new? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iWiN4PreP 613 Posted January 21 (edited) 1 minute ago, Chicago White Sox said: Has the Reddit guy posted anything new? yes, https://www.reddit.com/user/itbayly/comments/ " Patients young one. Both those tweets were tweeted significantly after my original post." then links to al cheesy and other foodie account tweets regarding Burnes. One of the tweets since has been deleted this was within 2 hours ago Edited January 21 by iWiN4PreP Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Y2Jimmy0 1,862 Posted January 21 33 minutes ago, SoCalChiSox said: Jimmy, whats the damage? Whats the compensation going to MIL? Is Vaughn/Kopech involved? I’m not sure anything is even happening. That Brewers has broken stories in the past before and I thought his tweet was interesting. I doubt Kopech or Vaughn are going anywhere regardless. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MiddleCoastBias 344 Posted January 21 2 minutes ago, iWiN4PreP said: yes, https://www.reddit.com/user/itbayly/comments/ Wait, so he's citing tweets from the foodies after he posted his rumlr as proof that it's happening... when the foodies are likely basing their tweets on his Reddit rumor? Talk about a reliable. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chicago White Sox 5,790 Posted January 21 I think you guys are going to be real upset when this Burnes stuff turns out to BS and we end up with my man Richards! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Y2Jimmy0 1,862 Posted January 21 2 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: I think you guys are going to be real upset when this Burnes stuff turns out to BS and we end up with my man Richards! I’d be good with that. Keep the prospects for now 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chicago White Sox 5,790 Posted January 21 Just now, Y2Jimmy0 said: I’d be good with that. Keep the prospects for now Unless we can get Burnes for a Madrigal based package, just sign Richards and keep the ammo for the deadline IMO. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
caulfield12 1,853 Posted January 21 9 minutes ago, iWiN4PreP said: yes, https://www.reddit.com/user/itbayly/comments/ " Patients young one. Both those tweets were tweeted significantly after my original post." then links to al cheesy and other foodie account tweets regarding Burnes. One of the tweets since has been deleted this was within 2 hours ago Somebody who can't spell patience correctly might want to consider retaining their food services-related position. Also, referring to someone online as "young one" doesn't inspire much confidence, either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Orlando 1,416 Posted January 21 1 minute ago, Y2Jimmy0 said: I’d be good with that. Keep the prospects for now Same. I have kept my expectations in check. Richards is who I actually expect. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sox80 231 Posted January 21 3 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: I think you guys are going to be real upset when this Burnes stuff turns out to BS and we end up with my man Richards! I would be fine with not trading away to many prospects. Richards a lefthand bat and I'm good honestly. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chicago White Sox 5,790 Posted January 21 1 minute ago, Sox80 said: I would be fine with not trading away to many prospects. Richards a lefthand bat and I'm good honestly. Richards + Cruz would also work 😉 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Orlando 1,416 Posted January 21 (edited) Searched Corbin Burnes on Twitter and found this: I have no idea who this is but now we have two guys with no credibility claiming it! Yay! (Followed by Bilek and has Harold Baines as a picture so I think it’s Harolds Leg Lift’s Twitter lol) Edited January 21 by Orlando Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chicago White Sox 5,790 Posted January 21 1 minute ago, Orlando said: Searched Corbin Burnes on Twitter and found this: I have no idea who this is but now we have two guys with no credibility claiming it! Yay! As much I’d like to believe there is an ounce of truth to that deal, there is no way in hell that dude is legit...lol 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChiliIrishHammock24 755 Posted January 21 4 minutes ago, Orlando said: Searched Corbin Burnes on Twitter and found this: I have no idea who this is but now we have two guys with no credibility claiming it! Yay! This person follows me on Twitter apparently, so they must be real! I will not stand for slander against my beloved munchkins! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
