Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
bmags

the old Corbin Burnes thread, we have a new Burnes thread

Recommended Posts

I think a Burnes package realistically costs something like Madrigal + Kelly + Bailey or Stiever + Dalquist + Thompson + Sanchez.

In a perfect world the Sox could get him for Madrigal + Dalquist + Thompson + Sanchez.  

But if there's any truth to it I think Stiever is definitely in it.  He's a MIL type, also from the area.

And if I'm MIL I want Stiever + Kelly + Dalquist + Bailey from the Sox, and want nothing to do with Madrigal.  But I wouldn't make that deal if I was the Sox.  Maybe Stiever + Kelly + Dalquist + Sanchez, and that would be a serious haul; that's still 3-4 MLBers IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All the insiders looking to get the free klout increases

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, ron883 said:

The guy once posted Ozzie's phone number (supposedly) on reddit. I'm going to believe this rumor is true. 

Ozzie gave out his phone number live on air on CSN during a pregame or postgame show.  Anyone watching could have had that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, CWSpalehoseCWS said:

 

 

Key to trash? lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, YourWhatHurts said:

I think a Burnes package realistically costs something like Madrigal + Kelly + Bailey or Stiever + Dalquist + Thompson + Sanchez.

In a perfect world the Sox could get him for Madrigal + Dalquist + Thompson + Sanchez.  

But if there's any truth to it I think Stiever is definitely in it.  He's a MIL type, also from the area.

And if I'm MIL I want Stiever + Kelly + Dalquist + Bailey from the Sox, and want nothing to do with Madrigal.  But I wouldn't make that deal if I was the Sox.  Maybe Stiever + Kelly + Dalquist + Sanchez, and that would be a serious haul; that's still 3-4 MLBers IMO.

I think you (and the reddit poster who made a similar request) are right here.

Stiever +Bailey + a bit more like you said. 

I think Madrigal stays.

I find it hard to believer they would trade Kelley after convincing him to sign with us, but I have no problem with trading him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, chw42 said:

Key to trash? lol

guy on twitter replies says lock his mouth shut and throw away the key (i.e. not saying anything about a secret)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, iWiN4PreP said:

I think you (and the reddit poster who made a similar request) are right here.

Stiever +Bailey + a bit more like you said. 

I think Madrigal stays.

I find it hard to believer they would trade Kelley after convincing him to sign with us, but I have no problem with trading him. 

Stiever and Bailey and a bit more doesn’t even get you Musgrove 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No no obviously its

lips are sealed, key or bin

keyorbin 

keyorbin Burnes 

corbin Burnes 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 9
  • Fire 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, fathom said:

Stiever and Bailey and a bit more doesn’t even get you Musgrove 

Panamanian Prince should net anyone tbh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, fathom said:

Stiever and Bailey and a bit more doesn’t even get you Musgrove 

Agreed. Bailey has no loud tools other than being fundamentally sound, and Stiever hurt his value last season by not coming close to his reported 97+ mph.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, iWiN4PreP said:

I think you (and the reddit poster who made a similar request) are right here.

Stiever +Bailey + a bit more like you said. 

I think Madrigal stays.

I find it hard to believer they would trade Kelley after convincing him to sign with us, but I have no problem with trading him. 

That’s not coming close to getting Burnes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

That’s not coming close to getting Burnes

Seriously. If sox get burnes (they aren't) its either Kopech or Vaughn going. Otherwise Hahn proves he is still the master and preller is just a padawan.

Edited by EloyJenkins

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

That’s not coming close to getting Burnes

Burnes has big potential but I wouldn't give a huge haul for him. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

That’s not coming close to getting Burnes

Well, we aren't trading Kopech/Vaughn/Madrigal in this deal (if we were willing to trade one of them, we'd be going after a SP with less risk).

So Stevier + Bailey + Kelley + other like Dalquist or something. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, fathom said:

Stiever and Bailey and a bit more doesn’t even get you Musgrove 

Fathom, for those of us who have never heard of Garrett Richards or Burnes. Clearly a difference between money and a trade but from a standpoint of what they’ve already accomplished vs future potential is 1 of those 2 better than the other? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lips are sealed throw away the key

 

 

Edited by Orlando

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, iWiN4PreP said:

Yellich + Burnes for Vaughn + Kopech + Kelley

 

4ugrhu.jpg

Edited by RagahRagah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, iWiN4PreP said:

Well, we aren't trading Kopech/Vaughn/Madrigal in this deal (if we were willing to trade one of them, we'd be going after a SP with less risk).

So Stevier + Bailey + Kelley + other like Dalquist or something. 

I'm not convinced you get Burnes without Kopech or Vaughn, but I'm far more convinced if we were shopping Kopech or Vaughn the target would be better than Burnes.

Edited by mac9001
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×