Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Bob Sacamano

Sox @ Royals 7/28, 7:10

Recommended Posts

Just now, Chicago White Sox said:

How many innings can he realistically get if he’s primarily limited to one inning appearances?

Tony has been trying to use him for 2 innings on multiple occasions. I think with the playoffs you can realistically get him up near 80 innings. I think expecting something more than 150 next year was never realistic in the first place given how much they want to baby him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jack Parkman said:

It's baseball, you can luck your way into a championship. See: 2005 Sox. 

Judas Priest, Margaret....what in the actual hell?

2005 Sox pitching straight DOMINATED in the post season, that isn't luck.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Holland can't cure our offensive woes, then nothing probably will. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jack Parkman said:

It's baseball, you can luck your way into a championship. See: 2005 Sox. 

Ah, so there literally is no pleasing you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, fathom said:

I'm always negative and even I find his posts ridiculous

I like most of Jack's posts.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jack Parkman said:

It's baseball, you can luck your way into a championship. See: 2005 Sox. 

Dang pessimism reaching a new low. They are winning good you need to attack the World Series team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jack Parkman said:

It's baseball, you can luck your way into a championship. See: 2005 Sox. 

The team that was first place from the first day to the last day of the season? That went 110-64 (46 games over .500) over the regular season and playoffs?

  • Love 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Capn12 said:

I mean, the team is going through some offensive woes right now, for sure..but......

 

"not very good" ?? Some of you guys slay me.

Who else said they're not very good besides jack? Honest question 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
Just now, Heads22 said:

The team that was first place from the first day to the last day of the season? That went 110-64 (46 games over .500) over the regular season and playoffs?

And the team that missed the playoffs the following season and lost 90 games 2 seasons later. 

Edited by Jack Parkman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Heads22 said:

The team that was first place from the first day to the last day of the season? That went 110-64 (46 games over .500) over the regular season and playoffs?

Smoke and mirrors, my friend. Smoke. And. Mirrors.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said:

It's baseball, you can luck your way into a championship. See: 2005 Sox and 2006 Cardinals. 

The 2005 White Sox had the best record in baseball for 90% of the season.

Is this just you "tempering" your expectations for a team that already won the title? At this point I just feel like you're trolling, and it's not your pessimism any longer but your desire to say irrational things to get a reaction.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On another note ignoring Parkmans stupidity. Kris Bryant is playing short stop for the Cubs right now 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sox80 said:

Who else said they're not very good besides jack? Honest question 

Probably just him, but even 1 who thinks that a team 20 over .500 is 'bad', is too many.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jack Parkman said:

And the team that missed the playoffs the following season and lost 90 games 2 seasons later. 

Sounds like an unlucky 2006. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Baron said:

On another note ignoring Parkmans stupidity. Kris Bryant is playing short stop for the Cubs right now 

sounds like something the Mets would want to see

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jack Parkman said:

And the team that lost 90 games 2 seasons later. 

What does a roster two years later have to do with a roster in that year? They won 90 games the next year. So they went 200-136 over two seasons, winning 60% of their games, and it was all luck. You have become insufferable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, harkness99 said:

tim cant pull the ball worth a shit 

Will be in a rut until he goes back to hitting to the opposite field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hot Take time though: every team that has every won the World Series since 94 has gotten lucky. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we really pinch hitting for Eloy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, fathom said:

sounds like something the Mets would want to see

Exactly what I was thinking. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Abreu needs a day off or something, just mired in a big pool o' bad, right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are diminishing returns to never giving Abreu a day off. I really hope he's not in the lineup tomorrow.

Get him fresh for the Cleveland series.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×