Jump to content

Romy our 2nd baseman of the future?


DanofDuPage
 Share

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, FoxForce2 said:

I don't see how this is an either/or case. Projections indicate that Baez will cost $15-20 mil/year (maybe more.)  Just as a comparison - Profar or Taylor will get something like $10-12 mil/year. From a cost effectiveness angle alone the latter two are better options. Then the team chemistry side comes into play. Baez is a high profile personality - is he really a good fit for this team? That and his often extreme hot/cold plate performance swings make him a questionable option for the Sox. Depending on how Popeye and Gonzales are viewed and projected, I don't know that the Sox even go as high as the Profar/Taylor level contracts. There may be a 2b near MLB ready prospect in another team's system that is blocked ala Burger. i.e. there are several paths to consider.  I just don't see Baez. And as a fan - don't really want him.
But then I was dead set against the whole Machado nonsense from the start - which says more about me than any of these guys. I'm still waiting for Hahn's call on this matter - plenty of room on my voicemails.

I read a interesting article about Baez a few weeks ago. The writer maintained that the Mets were the only team interested in Baez. Maybe he won't be getting $15-20 mil/year offers. All I know is the White Sox have a hole at 2nd base. I wish that Madrigal had never been traded.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Jerry McNertney said:

I certainly hope Gonzalez isn't the Sox second baseman of the future. Madrigal should be the second baseman of the future. We can all agree that trading Madrigal for a sweaty, super expensive, inconsistent set-up man will likely go down as one of the worst trades in White Sox history. To get Madrigal back from the Cubs, the Sox could offer Vaughn and Kopech, but I'm pretty sure the Cubs would want more than that.

Turn off your playstation and go back to bed.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Jerry McNertney said:

We can all agree that trading Madrigal for a sweaty, super expensive, inconsistent set-up man will likely go down as one of the worst trades in White Sox history. 

It’s not even the second worst trade in Hahn history. Way behind He Who Shall Not Be Named and Semien/Bassitt. Might not be worse than Montas.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, GreenSox said:

 Moncada, however, would be difficult to move to due his hefty salary.  And it's a stretch to count on Burger.

I was referring to thoughts on this board that they should shift Yoan back to second. I don’t think anyone is considering trading Moncada during the competitive window.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Timmy U said:

It’s not even the second worst trade in Hahn history. Way behind He Who Shall Not Be Named and Semien/Bassitt. Might not be worse than Montas.

Hey! J. Shields was a reasonable #4-5 starter, solid clubhouse presence, and worth every bit of $5-6 mil/year.
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr wait..................................
 

Edited by FoxForce2
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Leonard Zelig said:

I don’t remember.  I read it in the past few days.  I don’t know if it’s accurate information or not.  The site isn’t letting me search so I can’t find the post.  

I don't know who said that, but the Sox called up Romy and Sheets on Sept 1 when they DFAed Lamb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jerry McNertney said:

I certainly hope Gonzalez isn't the Sox second baseman of the future. Madrigal should be the second baseman of the future. We can all agree that trading Madrigal for a sweaty, super expensive, inconsistent set-up man will likely go down as one of the worst trades in White Sox history. To get Madrigal back from the Cubs, the Sox could offer Vaughn and Kopech, but I'm pretty sure the Cubs would want more than that.

That set up man's success or failure depends solely on the postseason. If he excels and helps Sox claim WS title, he'll be a hero and the trade will look good. If he's a postseason bust, acquiring him was a big mistake. We shall see. On paper the Sox look like they are set up for success bullpen wise for the playoffs/WS.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, greg775 said:

That set up man's success or failure depends solely on the postseason. If he excels and helps Sox claim WS title, he'll be a hero and the trade will look good. If he's a postseason bust, acquiring him was a big mistake. We shall see. On paper the Sox look like they are set up for success bullpen wise for the playoffs/WS.

So if he throws 2 scoreless innings in the playoffs, but his previous 2 months of sucking makes the trade worth it? Nah, we would have to have an extended run in the playoffs and for him to have like 4-5 solid appearances to even consider it a “good” trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt Leury would be someone they’d easily let go. The Sox reward their character guys and his versatility suits us better than most teams because of how many players we have locked into corner infield and outfield spots. How many teams are 1) competing where they’d want to play a vet over trying out someone with upside and control 2) as short on middle infield and corner OF defense where they’d pay much for a below average hitter

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/19/2021 at 6:11 AM, hankchifan said:

I am for keeping Leury.  He is a high energy guy who can play several positions and is a switch hitter.

I totally agree, I think many people on here don't realise that a utility guy like Leury is priceless (not literally) to a team, he can play virtually anywhere on the pitch to a good enough standard, not exceptional but acceptable, and his bat is not as bad as many people seem to think, again he is not exceptional but more than acceptable. If he accepts a reasonable contract offer keep him.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...