fathom Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Sleepy Harold said: Way less than I thought he’d get. I bet they sign Cobb in the next few days. Edited November 22, 2021 by fathom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjusttyped Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 Rollin it back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 13 minutes ago, caulfield12 said: Alex Wood was always the odd man out assuming they make a full court press on retaining Gausman... Sounds Wood is basically nearing terms with the Giants… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 21 minutes ago, caulfield12 said: Alex Wood was always the odd man out assuming they make a full court press on retaining Gausman... This aged well. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poppysox Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 48 minutes ago, hi8is said: That’s much higher than I expected for Tepera I agree...2 for 12 seems about right IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 The pitching market is starting to move real fast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 So here’s the remaining starting pitchers on MLBTR’s top 50 free agents list: 05) Kevin Gausman: 6/$138M | $23M AAV 07) Robbie Ray: 5/$130M | $26M AAV 09) Max Scherzer: 3/$120M | $40M AAV 11) Marcus Stroman: 5/$110M | $22M AAV 14) Eduardo Rodriguez: 5/$77M | $15.4M AAV 18) Carlos Rodon: 1/$25M 19) Jon Gray: 4/$56M | $14M AAV 22) Anthony DeSclafani: 3/$36M | $12M AAV 23) Justin Verlander: 2/$50M | $25M AAV 26) Alex Wood: 2/$20M+ | $10M+ AAV 27) Steven Matz: 3/$27M | $9M AAV 33) Clayton Kershaw: 1/$20M 34) Yusei Kikuchi: 2/$20M 37) Noah Syndergaard: 1/$21M 39) Alex Cobb: 2/$16M | $8M AAV 40) Zack Greinke: 1/$15M 46) Corey Kluber: 1/$12M 48) Danny Duffy: 1/$10M 50) Andrew Heaney: 1/$8.5M If Matz signs soon, that would be 5 of MLBTR’s top 11 starters off the board and giant chunk of the B / C tier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 Seems like Matz is best option Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 4 minutes ago, bmags said: Seems like Matz is best option Not in on him supposedly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 11 minutes ago, bmags said: Seems like Matz is best option For us? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 10 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: For us? I mean, yeah. I for one think we actually have a good pitching coach - and Yeah while getting a guy who has been more wild isn’t great - Katz helped make our other wild pitchers effective. And sinker, change, curve, slider is an interesting pitches I think Katz could work with. With the exception of Scherzer and Stroman, two pitchers I have low confidence we’d land, will be difficult to pay for strong, known productivity. So reasonable upside you can escape from seems like next best play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 10 minutes ago, bmags said: With the exception of Scherzer and Stroman, two pitchers I have low confidence we’d land, will be difficult to pay for strong, known productivity. So reasonable upside you can escape from seems like next best play. I think we’ll end up with our next rotation piece via trade once again this off-season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 5 minutes ago, hi8is said: I think we’ll end up with our next rotation piece via trade once again this off-season. And I’m optimistic there. I love the As/Reds options 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjusttyped Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 I've thought the Giants made sense as a potential Rodon landing spot. But if they land Cobb or Matz then that can probably be ruled out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 Matz would be nice fit for Angels - than they will go after Scherzer after. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonard Zelig Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 10 hours ago, bmags said: Fun update: settings have been changed to allow posters to see who reacted to their post and with what. A reminder that all reactions are a positive +1 on the reputation scoreboard. For now, the laugh emoji is still there, but if certain sensitive sammies try to start bar fights over it, it will be removed. Contrary to some notions, this was never enabled except to mods. But we are bringing you knowledge of how fire is made, may you use it for only good. I have a feeling that we are going to see much fewer reactions now. Is this change retroactive to all reactions given in the past? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSpalehoseCWS Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 2 hours ago, bmags said: And I’m optimistic there. I love the As/Reds options Same. There’s easily 4 guys I would be happy with, then the next question is what happens with Keuchel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 2 hours ago, Leonard Zelig said: I have a feeling that we are going to see much fewer reactions now. Is this change retroactive to all reactions given in the past? Probably so...but doesn't seem like the greatest idea in the world, unless the plan is to create more animosity between posters. SoxTalk Hunger Games. Or Squid Games, or something like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 It’s little images of a heart, I think you all will survive 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 1 hour ago, CWSpalehoseCWS said: Same. There’s easily 4 guys I would be happy with, then the next question is what happens with Keuchel. Have fun browsing through your notifications for hours on end. 😆 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 58 minutes ago, bmags said: It’s little images of a heart, I think you all will survive I’m just pissed off there’s still no “blowing kisses” icon I can use to blow up @greg775’s inbox with. 😢 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 6 hours ago, Bob Sacamano said: Why is he odd man out? I would think Cueto would be out of the guys they lost. Sure, but they really liked Wood, just not as much as DeScalfini. We will see if they circle back to Cueto after January if other options are off the table. Obviously, Gausman has to be the next priority to address. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South Side Hit Men Posted November 23, 2021 Share Posted November 23, 2021 7 hours ago, Leonard Zelig said: I have a feeling that we are going to see much fewer reactions now. Is this change retroactive to all reactions given in the past? Perhaps, but not sure how cowardly one must be to be concerned with someone reviewing their reaction, especially on an anonymous message board. People should be all for transparency, and should be able to stand by what they post and also their reactions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.