Jump to content

Offseason Part 2 - Lets the Rumors & Action Begin


Chisoxfn
 Share

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, SoxBlanco said:

Is John Means a possible trade target? Or would he cost too much given the three years of control he still has?

I promoted a Vaughn for Means swap to us fake GMs a month ago and it was widely thrown up on. That said, Means would be a great add given his stuff, cost and years of control.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

Either La Russa has gone blind or he’s helping Hahn negotiate via the media.

Let’s hope so, because WOOF.  I need corrective lenses and all but the Gavin I saw, the movement wasn’t so great.  Nor the routes or the fielding.  He bad out there TLR…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Sarava said:

Isn't that too much for a guy that's pretty much a lock to be gone after 1 season?

I don't mind the idea of Manaea, but boy do we have a pretty awful track record when trading with the A's....please don't give up too much for 1 year of his services.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harold's Leg Lift said:

and he's pitched well in his career against the Astros.  107 IP 3.43 ERA 1.180 WHIP

Harold, when is the LHH savage going to be acquired? 

They are dicking around and ignoring their real needs. 

Edited by SoCalChiSox
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not offened by the Josh Harrison signing or a 2B platoon w/Leury. I can even warm to the idea of the combo platter in RF (although it marginalizes Vaughns potential). But the Sox need a reliable rotation piece w/mid-TOR stuff (Means?) and hopefully a back-up defensive oriented Catcher. Check those boxes and we're good.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! said:

No idea how he has a platform when he doesn’t even understand basic trade values.

We have too many glorified wannabe journalists covering the Sox on Twitter these days.  I've learned to mute most of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Flash said:

I promoted a Vaughn for Means swap to us fake GMs a month ago and it was widely thrown up on. That said, Means would be a great add given his stuff, cost and years of control.

Trading Vaughn for 3 arb years of a decent SP (career fip around 4.5) would be awful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...