Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Controlled Chaos


Recommended Posts

Why Is It Okay to Say "White Trash?"

By Larry Elder




Who would dare use that expression -- especially in public? Yet calling poor, presumably morally degenerate Caucasians "white trash" is perfectly OK.


On the television show "Politically Incorrect," host Bill Maher and his panel discussed the recent shooting death of a guest who appeared on "The Jerry Springer Show." A couple -- a man and a woman -- accused the man's ex-wife of stalking them. Then the alleged stalker, the man's ex-wife, also appeared on the show. Guess what, learns the alleged stalker, her ex-husband is now ... married! And he's married to the woman who appeared with him on the program! Gotcha! Now, weren't you embarrassed, you stalker.


But the show fell flat when the alleged stalker seemed indifferent about the revelation of her ex-husband's new marriage, asserted that she wanted nothing further to do with him, and calmly walked off the stage.


But shortly after the program aired, the police in Sarasota, Fla., found the alleged stalker dead, and the couple on the lam.


On "Politically Incorrect," Maher asked whether to hold the "Springer" show morally, if not legally, responsible for the guest's murder. One of his panelists called those who appear on such shows "white trash," and humorously suggested that these programs provide a kind of safety valve for troubled guests who, for whatever reason, agree to appear. To this, Maher said, "So you're saying Jerry Springer is doing a service to America by having white trash kill each other?" White trash?


Interesting. We live in an era where radio talk-show host Dr. Laura Schlessinger catches fire for calling homosexuals "biological errors."


Schlessinger apologized, but protesters remain unappeased. On the NBC program "Will & Grace," critics attacked the show when a character referred to her Salvadoran maid as a "hot tamale." In response, the network dubbed in a less offensive expression. We call illegal aliens "undocumented workers." We call blacks "African-Americans." Fine.


But why, then, is it perfectly OK in polite company to call to low-income, often southern-dwelling people "white trash"?


Take the President Bill Clinton-Paula Jones scandal. Is there a greater example of the harsh treatment and media pile-on against so-called "white trash"? Recall that Jones, then an Arkansas state employee, claimed then governor Bill Clinton groped her and solicited sex. The National Organization for Women did nothing.


Anita Hill, on the other hand, made a far less serious and less provable accusation against then Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas. She claimed that Thomas wanted to date her, and, among other things, suggestively told her about a pubic hair on his Coke. OK, not exactly one of the greatest opening lines, but Hill and supporters pronounced it sexual harassment. Experts in sexual harassment law considered Jones' case far stronger. After all, she told people about it when it happened and specifically named Clinton as the perpetrator. And in the Jones case, the accused had a pattern of coming on to women -- one of the customary ways in which a plaintiff proves a he-said-she-said sexual harassment case.


But Anita Hill became a heroine, a symbol of the oppression women experience in the mean streets of corporate America. NOW championed her cause. Some even likened her to historical black heroines like Harriet Tubman and Sojourner Truth!


As for Jones? Remember Clinton defender James Carville's famous line, "Drag $100 through a trailer park and there's no telling what you'll find."


In today's era of racial sensitivity, safe targets like white trash remain. Former California Assembly Speaker Willie Brown once called political opponents "white boys." Al Gore's campaign manager, Donna Brazile, referred to the GOP as the "party of the white boys."


Comedian Jeff Foxworthy makes a good living by poking fun at "rednecks."


But Foxworthy, himself a Southerner, calls his humor respectfully self-deprecating, rather than insulting or dismissive. But apparently anybody can ridicule low-income, uneducated whites by branding them "white trash." Could someone like Bill Maher go on national television and suggest that only "black trash" or "Latino trash" appear on such programs?


What's the point? When a guest or host appears on a show like "Politically Incorrect" and derides a category of people by race, that's entertainment.


But were the host to blanketly ridicule low-income minorities, that's hate speech. Indeed, many colleges have passed "speech codes," outlawing insensitive or demeaning language directed towards racial or ethnic groups.


Try it. Substitute "black trash" for "white trash." After all, a disproportionate number of blacks appear on these tabloid shows. Frankly, by not calling black guests "black trash," aren't we suggesting blacks who appear on "Springer" represent mainstream black America? Now that's insulting.


Picking on, demeaning, and ridiculing whites is OK. But by demeaning any group by race, we open the door and grant permission to demean others.


Bottom line, either race-based insults are offensive or they're not.


Pick one.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have slowly gotten to the point in time that a person's words are defined not by the person stating them, but by anyone else. In other words if one person, or one group of people are insulted by how something is phrased, it is defined as wrong. No matter how the speaker or writer meant them.


Even if the speaker's intent is plain as day to everyone. I think we've become too uptight.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tex is 100% correct. Many have become too uptight in this country. Everybody wants laws in place so we don't offend anybody and we can't have anything offensive on the radio/TV/internet.


I can see a person in a position of power (CEO, President etc. etc. etc.) getting s*** for making a statement that is offensive. I can see the wrongness in explicit racially insensitive words that we all know. But a statement like "hot tamale" isn't exactly insensitive. On the GOP comments...when the party in 2000 vote counts demographically are overwhelmingly white (like over 90%), I think it is safe to call them "white boys". If he called them, say "sheet wearing honkeys" or something of that vein, then I think that's insensitive.


That being said, Elder does have a point in what he said but over-sensitivity to any statement with racial/ethnic/religious content is what has happened to this country. Some sensitivity is necessary and warranted but some of the s*** in this country is getting f***ing rediculous.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it is safe to call them "white boys". If he called them, say "sheet wearing honkeys" or something of that vein, then I think that's insensitive.


Try calling a black man "boy" sometime.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.