Jump to content
S720

WSCR report regarding RJ

Recommended Posts

you think he meant pierzynski sp?

I would love to get Burnett, that mfer can throw. I dont know if you all remember when he pitched vs us this year. He put us on a f'cn slump for months. We were hot before that game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont kno why people are so excited about this deal. i mean its not THAT great. you still got a hole in the rotation, youre trading the best left setupman prolly in the majors IMO, arguably the number 1 or 2 prospect in our organization, and another prospect? cmon that isnt that great, for just 1 year of RJ. its not even close to a guarantee that we even make the playoffs with that offense and the 5 spot hole again. id MUCH rather get hudson and sign him to a longterm deal. becasue IMO this deal could really kill us in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i dont kno why people are so excited about this deal. i mean its not THAT great. you still got a hole in the rotation, youre trading the best left setupman prolly in the majors IMO, arguably the number 1 or 2 prospect in our organization, and another prospect? cmon that isnt that great, for just 1 year of RJ. its not even close to a guarantee that we even make the playoffs with that offense and the 5 spot hole again. id MUCH rather get hudson and sign him to a longterm deal. becasue IMO this deal could really kill us in the future.

Who do you think the Sox will give the A's for Hudson? I imagine Garland would be a part of that deal too...which would leave the 5th SP hole open again. And I'm sure KW would want to give Hudson an extension.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Who  do you think the Sox will give the A's for Hudson?  I imagine Garland would be a part of that deal too...which would leave the 5th SP hole open again.  And I'm sure KW would want to give Hudson an extension.

Hudson would be my 1st pick. We would have the new BIG 3 in baseball. s*** that would be sweet!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so if we did this trade we would have essentially no money left?? i still say do it but i would like to add another bat or possibly another starter like perez or to a lesser extent wilson alvarez. then we would be really deadlly.. :cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Who  do you think the Sox will give the A's for Hudson?  I imagine Garland would be a part of that deal too...which would leave the 5th SP hole open again.  And I'm sure KW would want to give Hudson an extension.

Look at the same deal for RJ as Hudson, Gar, Marte, Anderson, and mid-prospect. Whichever GM bites first I'd be happy.

 

With the A's, I'd be glad to throw in Everett for Kendall too. :D :D :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Who  do you think the Sox will give the A's for Hudson?  I imagine Garland would be a part of that deal too...which would leave the 5th SP hole open again.  And I'm sure KW would want to give Hudson an extension.

no, you wouldnt have a hole, because i have no problem gving them Bmac as long as hudson signs a deal before the deal. I think something like Bmac, Young, and a couple low prospects could get it done. if we sign hudson to an extension, and that be would a contingency of the deal, we would havee 3 studs locked up for a few years, where w/ RJ he would most likely be here for a year. I sa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dude aj burnett is not that good why the f*** would you want him, hes horrible, hes just gonna get injured, id rather have hermanson pitch instead of aj burnett  :stick

One injury does not make him injury prone...

 

So your saying that you would not want a guy who can win 15 and strike out 200+???

 

:stick :huh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dude aj burnett is not that good why the f*** would you want him, hes horrible, hes just gonna get injured, id rather have hermanson pitch instead of aj burnett  :stick

LMFAO!!!! i hope ur joking. burnett is a f***in stud. he'd be at least the second best SP on our team, if no the best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LMFAO!!!!  i hope ur joking. burnett is a f***in stud. he'd be at least the second best SP on our team, if no the best.

It's hard to be the best when you can't stay healthy. Burnett will never stay healthy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Be done with it already.

 

 

 

TSN's Ken Rosenthal believes the Dodgers could send Shawn Green to Arizona in a three-team deal that would get Randy Johnson on the Yankees.

Javier Vazquez would go to the Dodgers, and we assume Los Angeles would have to send Edwin Jackson and cash to Arizona. The Diamondbacks would also want prospects from the Yankees. Dec. 16 - 3:33 pm et

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want anything to do with RJ or Vazquez now. We're not in the position to create more holes than filling them with any trade we make.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Be done with it already.

 

 

 

TSN's Ken Rosenthal believes the Dodgers could send Shawn Green to Arizona in a three-team deal that would get Randy Johnson on the Yankees.

Javier Vazquez would go to the Dodgers, and we assume Los Angeles would have to send Edwin Jackson and cash to Arizona. The Diamondbacks would also want prospects from the Yankees. Dec. 16 - 3:33 pm et

No s***. Im so sick of hearing about RJ, I dont even know if I like the current deal, still seems a bit much for me. Just trade the guy already, im sick of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems that the Yankees are focusing on Hudson now. I would think that RJ is still in their sights, but maybe they know that the Sox want to land ohnson themselves vs. being part of a three-way deal. If that's the case, and they have shifted their focus away from the Unit, it seems likely that the Sox have a good chance to aquire him.

 

As far as a fifth starter, if this deal goes down, one would think that we could get away with Schoe as #5 due to the number of games Johnson could win. If the rotation were Johnson, Garcia, Buehrle, Contreras, and Schoe, you could be looking at wins as such: 19, 17, 17, 15, and 12. That would be pretty good...and who's to say Johnson, Garcia, and Buehrle couldn't each win 20 games?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×