YASNY Posted April 6, 2005 Share Posted April 6, 2005 QUOTE(T R U @ Apr 6, 2005 -> 11:04 AM) I know I was joking I wanted to see how many people would flip out You'll never know. After that post, 95% of the posters put you on ignore! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted April 6, 2005 Share Posted April 6, 2005 (edited) QUOTE(YASNY @ Apr 6, 2005 -> 10:06 AM) You'll never know. After that post, 95% of the posters put you on ignore! I was wondering why my questions and comments in threads were going un-noticed :banghead Edited April 6, 2005 by T R U Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted April 6, 2005 Share Posted April 6, 2005 QUOTE(T R U @ Apr 6, 2005 -> 11:15 AM) I was wondering why my questions and comments in threads were going un-noticed :banghead Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted April 6, 2005 Share Posted April 6, 2005 QUOTE(YASNY @ Apr 6, 2005 -> 10:18 AM) Huh? You said after what I wrote 95% of the posters put me on ignore, so therefor if I post in other parts of the board, they wouldnt see what I wrote... thats why I said what I said.. man you killed the joke Yas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted April 6, 2005 Share Posted April 6, 2005 QUOTE(T R U @ Apr 6, 2005 -> 12:04 PM) You said after what I wrote 95% of the posters put me on ignore, so therefor if I post in other parts of the board, they wouldnt see what I wrote... thats why I said what I said.. man you killed the joke Yas "Huh?" was an extension of that joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted April 6, 2005 Share Posted April 6, 2005 QUOTE(YASNY @ Apr 6, 2005 -> 11:07 AM) "Huh?" was an extension of that joke. damn you.... now I ruined the joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted April 6, 2005 Share Posted April 6, 2005 QUOTE(T R U @ Apr 6, 2005 -> 12:11 PM) damn you.... now I ruined the joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeportHeather Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 I predict the Sox will start the season 3-1, with Buehrle and Duque getting wins in that mix... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 QUOTE(BridgeportHeather @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 02:37 AM) I predict the Sox will start the season 3-1, with Buehrle and Duque getting wins in that mix... Damn. You're GOOD! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeportHeather Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 QUOTE(YASNY @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 02:56 AM) Damn. You're GOOD! I am a recent graduate of Cleo's School of Foreshadowing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 QUOTE(BridgeportHeather @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 05:37 PM) I predict the Sox will start the season 3-1, with Buehrle and Duque getting wins in that mix... Looking at your sig, I predict that Neal Cotts gets a beard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Sox 92 wins in 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winnin Ugly Posted April 10, 2005 Author Share Posted April 10, 2005 Sox 95 Wins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighHeat45 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 161-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChWRoCk2 Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 QUOTE(whitesoxfan56789 @ Apr 9, 2005 -> 08:16 PM) 161-1 that would be nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeportHeather Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 QUOTE(chi-guy2 @ Apr 10, 2005 -> 12:56 AM) that would be nice Not as nice as 172-1! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ Apr 5, 2005 -> 07:39 AM) 3. NEW YORK 83-79 Yeah, you know, I don't think that this prediction is going to work out. I know that it's early and all, but they're now 0-5 and John Smoltz has just struck out 9 Mets batters in 15 at bats through 4 innings. Pedro is pitching an absolute gem thus far, but you get the feeling that they're still gonna lose. Oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 (edited) x- New York x- Atlanta Toronto Florida Boston Philadelphia Baltimore New York Tampa Bay Washington x- Chicago x- St Louis y- Minnesota y- Houston Cleveland Chicago Detroit Milwaukee Kansas City Cincinnati Pittsburgh x- Los Angeles x- Los Angeles Texas San Diego Oakland San Francisco Seattle Colorado Arizona Edited April 10, 2005 by knightni Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoomSlowik Posted April 11, 2005 Share Posted April 11, 2005 (edited) I know mine are a little late, but oh well. AL East- New York AL Central- Sox AL West- Anaheim AL WC- Boston NL East- Florida NL Central- Houston NL West- San Diego NL Wildcard- St. Louis AL Champs- Yankees NL Champs- Florida WS Champs- Yankees AL MVP- Vladimir Guererro NL MVP- Albert Pujols AL Cy Young- Johan Santana NL Cy Young- Ben Sheets I forgot an important bold prediction. Zambrano, Prior, and Wood all finish with ERA's over 3 and the Cubs lose numerous games 5-4 or 4-3 due to inconsistent offense, a weak pen, and somewhat inconsistent starting pitching, finishing within 5 games of .500. Edited April 11, 2005 by ZoomSlowik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Sox Posted April 13, 2005 Share Posted April 13, 2005 AL East: Yankees AL Central: AL West: Angels NL East: Braves NL Central: Cubs NL West: Goin out on a limb and sayin Diamondbacks It'll be worth it to see the Cubs make it to the world series because I conclude my prediction in saying: Sox over Cubs 4games - 2games in the World Series Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts