caulfield12 Posted January 27, 2015 Author Share Posted January 27, 2015 QUOTE (LDF @ Jan 27, 2015 -> 03:49 PM) i will not discuss #1 with you.... my problem with shield is his performance in the playoff. he is requesting how much and then look at his performance....... Nobody seems to hold that against Mr. Kershaw, haha. The Royals were smart all along to realize it would be better to go with someone with more upside and less wear and tear in Edinson Volquez. Of course, it could end up in disaster, but they do possess a lot more internal rotation options than they did 2 seasons ago, not to mention Hochevar will coming back as well as a swing man. When a team coming out of the World Series doesn't make ANY effort to keep such an integral player to their playoff run, it does make you wonder a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jan 27, 2015 -> 10:38 PM) Nobody seems to hold that against Mr. Kershaw, haha. The Royals were smart all along to realize it would be better to go with someone with more upside and less wear and tear in Edinson Volquez. Of course, it could end up in disaster, but they do possess a lot more internal rotation options than they did 2 seasons ago, not to mention Hochevar will coming back as well as a swing man. When a team coming out of the World Series doesn't make ANY effort to keep such an integral player to their playoff run, it does make you wonder a bit. go ahead and punch holes in my post. here i am trying to be a more improve poster, a happy poster, a congenial poster, and now you are trying to antagonize me with humor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmartija Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (LDF @ Jan 27, 2015 -> 03:49 PM) i will not discuss #1 with you.... my problem with shield is his performance in the playoff. he is requesting how much and then look at his performance....... ok, let me revise my #1. spending a bunch of money on a guy who is 33 years old is inefficient, and is money poorly used. Edited January 28, 2015 by Armchair Hahn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted March 25, 2015 Author Share Posted March 25, 2015 THREAD BROUGHT BACK TO PAGE 1 for LDF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Mar 25, 2015 -> 09:43 PM) THREAD BROUGHT BACK TO PAGE 1 for LDF ok, kick a guy when he is down, now i know what kind of person you are..... uh ugh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsox Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 QUOTE (sin city sox fan @ May 14, 2011 -> 11:50 AM) Don't forget that the White Sox also have to pay taxes....just like any other business. They can also depreciate the players' salaries. Or at least they used to be able to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted March 26, 2015 Author Share Posted March 26, 2015 And insurance payments/workmen's comp (Nate Jones)....all the big ticket contracts like Danks (for sure), Sale, Quintana, Eaton, Cabrera, Robertson, Abreu, Ramirez, etc. Not sure about Samardzija. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.