whitesoxfan101 Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (WHarris1 @ Jul 28, 2011 -> 09:44 PM) :lolhitting That's a phenomenal idea Look at that page. Before all of the Sox stuff, his last tweet was one about the draft in April. And before that, his last tweets were in September of last year. I wouldn't rule that theory out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heirdog Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 I call BS on this rumor. You don't trade a key component of your team ( thorrnton) who could get you a hell of a lot more talent just to salary dump Rios. And worst of all you trade him for a mark teahan type who you just dumped. If brewers are even remotely interested in Rios, just waive him and let them put in a claim and have him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (heirdog @ Jul 28, 2011 -> 09:54 PM) I call BS on this rumor. You don't trade a key component of your team ( thorrnton) who could get you a hell of a lot more talent just to salary dump Rios. And worst of all you trade him for a mark teahan type who you just dumped. If brewers are even remotely interested in Rios, just waive him and let them put in a claim and have him. Sure you do. Thornton is about to be 35 and is very expensive. This rumor is BS because even if you throw in Thornton, they wouldn't take Rios. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ Jul 28, 2011 -> 10:56 PM) Sure you do. Thornton is about to be 35 and is very expensive. This rumor is BS because even if you throw in Thornton, they wouldn't take Rios. I don't think they would take Rios if you threw in Danks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
103 mph screwball Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (heirdog @ Jul 28, 2011 -> 10:54 PM) I call BS on this rumor. You don't trade a key component of your team ( thorrnton) who could get you a hell of a lot more talent just to salary dump Rios. And worst of all you trade him for a mark teahan type who you just dumped. If brewers are even remotely interested in Rios, just waive him and let them put in a claim and have him. Unless you are salary dumping to sign Pujols in the offseason to play for the Sox new manager Tony La Russa. This rumor has to be BS. I wish there was some truth to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 (edited) One mans trash is another mans treasure, if you pay 90% of Rios contract Im sure you can find a team that would basically take Rios as a flier. You hope in a new environment he gets his head straight and hes a steal. If he doesnt you can do whatever because you only paid a few mil for him. (not saying this rumor is legit, just that you could deal Rios) Edited July 29, 2011 by Soxbadger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jul 28, 2011 -> 11:01 PM) One mans trash is another mans treasure, if you pay 90% of Rios contract Im sure you can find a team that would basically take Rios as a flier. You hope in a new environment he gets his head straight and hes a steal. If he doesnt you can do whatever because you only paid a few mil for him. (not saying this rumor is legit, just that you could deal Rios) If the Sox waived Rios, he would have another job in a few days making minimum while the Sox pay him off, but how much are the Sox willing to eat? If it is nothing, then no one wants Alex Rios. If its half, than maybe possibly there's a chance someone might take him, but I don't see JR eating that kind of money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapzk Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 maybe thats why the Sox are hesitant to deal Quentin cuz of Viciedo's injury, if the Rios deal is pretty much complete according to that guy, they wouldn't have any1 to replace RF besides Lillibridge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (kapzk @ Jul 28, 2011 -> 11:03 PM) maybe thats why the Sox are hesitant to deal Quentin cuz of Viciedo's injury, if the Rios deal is pretty much complete according to that guy, they wouldn't have any1 to replace RF besides Lillibridge. I think that this being complete BS is more likely. ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
103 mph screwball Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (kapzk @ Jul 29, 2011 -> 01:03 AM) maybe thats why the Sox are hesitant to deal Quentin cuz of Viciedo's injury, if the Rios deal is pretty much complete according to that guy, they wouldn't have any1 to replace RF besides Lillibridge. If Rios can be traded, KW would play RF himself if he had to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenksycat Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (heirdog @ Jul 28, 2011 -> 10:54 PM) I call BS on this rumor. You don't trade a key component of your team ( thorrnton) who could get you a hell of a lot more talent just to salary dump Rios. And worst of all you trade him for a mark teahan type who you just dumped. If brewers are even remotely interested in Rios, just waive him and let them put in a claim and have him. You do when said salary dump has an enormous contract. And we dumped Teahen not only because he sucked, but because he was also due money. Gamel is cheap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (heirdog @ Jul 28, 2011 -> 10:54 PM) I call BS on this rumor. You don't trade a key component of your team ( thorrnton) who could get you a hell of a lot more talent just to salary dump Rios. And worst of all you trade him for a mark teahan type who you just dumped. If brewers are even remotely interested in Rios, just waive him and let them put in a claim and have him. The Brewers are about to lose one of the elite run producers in the game after the season due to finances. You think they're going to claim Rios and pick up the rest of his contract? This very well and probably is BS. But if there's a shred of truth to this and we really want Rios gone, we're eatin' some money. A LOT of money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 I am confused about why we would seemingly have interest in trading two players on the major league roster - one a very good lefty reliever- for an infielder who has been up for short stints with Milwaikee in 4 seasons and failed to stick including this year. In 2009 the guy had 128 at bats and struck out 54 times. We have a high strike out guy now so why do we need another one? A contest maybe? Don't give me the line of shedding salary either thank you very much. Don't see any spot for him in the infield either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenksycat Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Jul 29, 2011 -> 09:44 AM) I am confused about why we would seemingly have interest in trading two players on the major league roster - one a very good lefty reliever- for an infielder who has been up for short stints with Milwaikee in 4 seasons and failed to stick including this year. In 2009 the guy had 128 at bats and struck out 54 times. We have a high strike out guy now so why do we need another one? A contest maybe? Don't give me the line of shedding salary either thank you very much. Don't see any spot for him in the infield either. ...shedding Rios's contract Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Jul 29, 2011 -> 09:44 AM) I am confused about why we would seemingly have interest in trading two players on the major league roster - one a very good lefty reliever- for an infielder who has been up for short stints with Milwaikee in 4 seasons and failed to stick including this year. In 2009 the guy had 128 at bats and struck out 54 times. We have a high strike out guy now so why do we need another one? A contest maybe? Don't give me the line of shedding salary either thank you very much. Don't see any spot for him in the infield either. Because one of those "major league" players is due a lot of money that hampers your payroll while performing like a minor league player Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 this rumor is garbage, zero chance this is happening Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jul 29, 2011 -> 10:41 AM) The Brewers are about to lose one of the elite run producers in the game after the season due to finances. You think they're going to claim Rios and pick up the rest of his contract? This very well and probably is BS. But if there's a shred of truth to this and we really want Rios gone, we're eatin' some money. A LOT of money. That's why there's potentially a grain of truth here. We still might be able to get a team to take on a nonzero amount of Rios's deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (Real @ Jul 29, 2011 -> 09:57 AM) this rumor is garbage, zero chance this is happening Well that settles that. Mods, lock the thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donny Lucy's Avocado Farm Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 (edited) This isn't even a rumor. Rumors are based on some semblence of logical conclusion (such as a team need, etc) and an "insider source" like Rosenthal, Heyman, Morosi, etc This is utter nonsense stirred up by some jamoke on the twitters. PS - I was also told Mat Gamel kinda sucks. ...... Did you see what I did there? Edited July 29, 2011 by Anderson Cooper's Quivering Lip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogan873 Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 I agree this trade makes no sense to either side, except to rid the Sox of an anchor of a contract. But what the hell would the Brewers want with a guy like Rios? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 Shedding Rios' salary is not areason to trade Thornton for someone we probably can't use. I think Rios can be dealt by himself. Anything is possible. I was told sometime earlier no one would take Teahan either Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maggsmaggs Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Jul 29, 2011 -> 12:13 PM) Shedding Rios' salary is not areason to trade Thornton for someone we probably can't use. I think Rios can be dealt by himself. Anything is possible. I was told sometime earlier no one would take Teahan either No one would ever touch Rios with a 100-foot pole by himself. I can guarantee that. Thorton is good, but we have Sale who is looking to be as good, if not better than Matt right now and in the future. Ohman has been perfect as the LOOGY. If you get rid of that salary of Rios, you are a heck of a lot closer to being able to compete for the next few years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenksycat Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Jul 29, 2011 -> 12:13 PM) Shedding Rios' salary is not areason to trade Thornton for someone we probably can't use. I think Rios can be dealt by himself. Anything is possible. I was told sometime earlier no one would take Teahan either Can you ship me several pounds of whatever you're smoking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Jul 29, 2011 -> 12:13 PM) Shedding Rios' salary is not areason to trade Thornton for someone we probably can't use. I think Rios can be dealt by himself. Anything is possible. I was told sometime earlier no one would take Teahan either I just threw up in my mouth. What are you talking about? What do you mean somebody will take Rios by himself? You can't be serious. If you're serious then I'm going down the street to this fat girl's house that likes me to have fun with her because fat girls never say no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyuen Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jul 29, 2011 -> 12:35 PM) I just threw up in my mouth. What are you talking about? What do you mean somebody will take Rios by himself? You can't be serious. If you're serious then I'm going down the street to this fat girl's house that likes me to have fun with her because fat girls never say no. would she say no if you had puke in your mouth? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.