Jump to content

Sports Media discussion


Recommended Posts

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 19, 2013 -> 01:01 PM)
It is free attention, which is the #1 reason he states most of the things that come out of his mouth. He is a highly paid troll.

 

He also hates being called dumb, which this article specifically states. Im sure he will talk about it today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Dec 19, 2013 -> 01:04 PM)
He also hates being called dumb, which this article specifically states. Im sure he will talk about it today

 

They were talking about it already in the crosstalk section! He denied calling Derrick a villain but maintains that he's a detriment to the team right now.

 

edit: Rose doesn't want to go through rebuilding and lose the team they currently have assembled, but last year his camp was saying that they need to get Derrick some support.

Edited by StrangeSox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 03:54 PM)
I think if someone comes to you saying they need to go to rehab, you can't fire them. They have ADA protections.

 

That's true as far as it goes, but an employee still has to regularly show up for the job he's been hired to perform. The employer has a legal duty to reasonably accommodate, but after awhile, it gets unreasonable to expect the employer to continually endure a series of lengthy absences, as has been the case with Mac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (PlaySumFnJurny @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:04 PM)
That's true as far as it goes, but an employee still has to regularly show up for the job he's been hired to perform. The employer has a legal duty to reasonably accommodate, but after awhile, it gets unreasonable to expect the employer to continually endure a series of lengthy absences, as has been the case with Mac.

I'm definitely not an employment lawyer, so I don't know the specifics, but based on what he said today, Mac approached management and said he needed to enter rehab. He wasn't just randomly not showing up to work before that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:06 PM)
I'm definitely not an employment lawyer, so I don't know the specifics, but based on what he said today, Mac approached management and said he needed to enter rehab. He wasn't just randomly not showing up to work before that.

 

This was not the first occasion when Mac left his show to deal with his problems, just the most recent. Also, from what I heard today, he told his program director off but good right before asking for this rehab leave. In light of that, it was generous of the Score to allow him to go, and it may have been well within its rights to fire him. He seemed to acknowledge that when I was listening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Under the law if he can't do his job they can fire him. If he's a drug addict and drunk, he can't perform his job. And neither, as far as I know, are recognized disabilities that would invoke the ADA.

 

He may have a special clause in his contract though, who knows.

Edited by Jenksismybitch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:38 PM)
I heard he is a pretty good guy outside of the ring when you get to know him

An outstanding individual. We had alot of fun in the clinic. He actually bought lunch for the entire clinic (pizzas) after his discharge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (ptatc @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:35 PM)
I helped him with one of his "comebacks". I helped him after a knee surgery.

I don't believe you, dead people don't need surgeries.

 

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:36 PM)
Under the law if he can't do his job they can fire him. If he's a drug addict and drunk, he can't perform his job. And neither, as far as I know, are recognized disabilities that would invoke the ADA.

 

He may have a special clause in his contract though, who knows.

I understand giving him a 2nd chance but I swear this is like 5 or 6, it's ridiculous at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Dec 20, 2013 -> 04:36 PM)
Under the law if he can't do his job they can fire him. If he's a drug addict and drunk, he can't perform his job. And neither, as far as I know, are recognized disabilities that would invoke the ADA.

 

He may have a special clause in his contract though, who knows.

 

 

Actually, alcoholism IS a protected disability under the ADA, and although one's present use of illegal drugs is not, a history of past addiction problems (even addiction to illicit drugs) is also. Of course, if an employee can't show up for work or get his job done because they are wasted or hung over, those ADA protections won't save them, which is to the point I was making before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...