Texsox Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 It's so obvious that I must be missing something that would keep it from happening. Besides it being a one or two year only thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 I hope he retires . I like him as much as anyone,but 4 cortisone injections into his shoulder tells you something is amiss. If he were totally healthy, Toronto would have had him on their roster. I don't want to see him on the mound for the White Sox a shell of his former self. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Scaringly, agreed. Nobody can forget those images of Willie Mays hanging on at the end, a shadow of his former glory and unrecognizable to fans who followed him from the early 50's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Maybe see if he's open to being a lefty reliever. If not, we don't really need him barring a trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 06:29 AM) Maybe see if he's open to being a lefty reliever. If not, we don't really need him barring a trade. He wouldn't hang on for one more season in that role unless the White Sox were a true pennant contender. Maybe come back in July? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 Knowing this organization, it's almost a lock they do sign Buehrle, which I'd find extremely disappointing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 09:21 AM) Knowing this organization, it's almost a lock they do sign Buehrle, which I'd find extremely disappointing. If it is a one year type of deal, and it allows the team to deal Quintana and get an equitable amount of talent for a place like 3B and/or C, it makes the team SO much better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 It's bad enough feeling sorry for Ventura, adding Buehrle to the lamentations list along with Konerko in 2014 would be about par for the course with the Sox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 09:37 AM) If it is a one year type of deal, and it allows the team to deal Quintana and get an equitable amount of talent for a place like 3B and/or C, it makes the team SO much better. I'd like to see what they get in return for Q, but it just seems like another nostalgic stopgap type of move Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 If they could move Danks and go with Johnson and Buehrle as 4/5, I'd be fine with it. I'm not moving Quintana though unless I get a ton back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 The Sox shouldn't trade Q unless they get at least 2 of a team's top 10 prospects as well as a lower ranked one with a lot of potential. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 11:14 AM) The Sox shouldn't trade Q unless they get at least 2 of a team's top 10 prospects as well as a lower ranked one with a lot of potential. I think they need to get guys close to major league ready or young guys already in majors. Trading Q for prospects doesn't really make sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 11:08 AM) I'd like to see what they get in return for Q, but it just seems like another nostalgic stopgap type of move It isn't nostalgia if he can still pitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 11:17 AM) I think they need to get guys close to major league ready or young guys already in majors. Trading Q for prospects doesn't really make sense. Totally this. They need a good to great starting C and/or 3B out of the deal to start with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogan873 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 11:56 AM) It isn't nostalgia if he can still pitch. It seems as if he can still pitch. If he were to be signed for a year or two for a moderate deal, I'd be okay with it. He's not going to be a #1 or #2 starter...he'd more likely to be a #4 or #5 guy. But he still got very close to 200 innings last year, so there's really no reason to think he couldn't pitch 175+ next year. As a 5th starter innings-eater, that would be perfect. All that being said, though, if the Sox were to sign him and trade Q, the return for Q would have to fill one of the crucial holes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 11:17 AM) I think they need to get guys close to major league ready or young guys already in majors. Trading Q for prospects doesn't really make sense. Agreed. If they trade him strictly for prospects, then they might as well trade every player of value and rebuild from scratch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (pittshoganerkoff @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 12:01 PM) It seems as if he can still pitch. If he were to be signed for a year or two for a moderate deal, I'd be okay with it. He's not going to be a #1 or #2 starter...he'd more likely to be a #4 or #5 guy. But he still got very close to 200 innings last year, so there's really no reason to think he couldn't pitch 175+ next year. As a 5th starter innings-eater, that would be perfect. All that being said, though, if the Sox were to sign him and trade Q, the return for Q would have to fill one of the crucial holes. I think he can still pitch too. Put him in a jersey for 1 year and somewhere between $10 and $15 million, and I am ok with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 11:56 AM) It isn't nostalgia if he can still pitch. If his name wasn't Mark Buehrle it wouldn't even be discussed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogan873 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 12:11 PM) If his name wasn't Mark Buehrle it wouldn't even be discussed. Maybe, but because his name is Mark Buehrle, the Sox know what kind of player (and guy) they would be getting by signing him. So, you're right to say that he's being talked about because of who he is, but by no means is that the only reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 12:11 PM) If his name wasn't Mark Buehrle it wouldn't even be discussed. His having played here for a decade + is a recruiting tool, absolutely. But it doesn't affect whether his signing would help the team to execute plans or not. But this isn't bringing back a no kneed Harold Baines. Mark Buehrle can still get major league hitters out, which is all that matters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (pittshoganerkoff @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 12:22 PM) Maybe, but because his name is Mark Buehrle, the Sox know what kind of player (and guy) they would be getting by signing him. So, you're right to say that he's being talked about because of who he is, but by no means is that the only reason. His clubhouse presence is also another great point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cabiness42 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 If his name wasn't Mark Buehrle it wouldn't even be discussed. If his name wasn't Mark Buehrle, he wouldn't be considering coming to the Sox on a 1-year, team-friendly contract. The Sox should absolutely leverage this advantage if Mark ultimately chooses to provide it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 12:23 PM) His having played here for a decade + is a recruiting tool, absolutely. But it doesn't affect whether his signing would help the team to execute plans or not. But this isn't bringing back a no kneed Harold Baines. Mark Buehrle can still get major league hitters out, which is all that matters. Given his struggles to end the season and injury flare ups I'm a bit worried about depending on him. I know he's been Mr. Consistency, but that's not gonna last forever. I'd hate to find out the hard way just to make JR and the fans happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 12:56 PM) Given his struggles to end the season and injury flare ups I'm a bit worried about depending on him. I know he's been Mr. Consistency, but that's not gonna last forever. I'd hate to find out the hard way just to make JR and the fans happy. I agree. Plus, I am so sick about hearing about JR and the loyalty crap, if Buehrle or AJP or Uribe came back and sucked, which father time is making more likely by the hour, it would be in full force. I understand wanting Buerhle back based on his numbers, but 4 cortisone shots, left off the postseason roster, should speak volumes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Oct 28, 2015 -> 12:01 PM) I agree. Plus, I am so sick about hearing about JR and the loyalty crap, if Buehrle or AJP or Uribe came back and sucked, which father time is making more likely by the hour, it would be in full force. I understand wanting Buerhle back based on his numbers, but 4 cortisone shots, left off the postseason roster, should speak volumes. He also pitched pretty far ahead of his peripherals for most of the year, and cooled down pretty hard down the stretch, both in terms of his results and his health. K/9 rate is down in the 4's and he's pitching more to contact than even before, and had a pretty low BABIP. I get the dream, but I think Buerhle has a lot more red flags than it seems on the surface. He's probably done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.