southsider2k5 Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 http://www.csnchicago.com/white-sox/2015-r...ts-fared-minors Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 Read that this morning. It was... awful. That whole article was bad - never seen CSN publish something that bad. Grammatical mistakes all over, complete misses on how some prospects were doing... just a really lackluster effort. I'd put any of the FS writers' version of this over what CSN published. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Sep 29, 2015 -> 06:01 PM) Read that this morning. It was... awful. That whole article was bad - never seen CSN publish something that bad. Grammatical mistakes all over, complete misses on how some prospects were doing... just a really lackluster effort. I'd put any of the FS writers' version of this over what CSN published. now i am kinda of hesitant to read it. why didn't they come over and got one yous guys to do it. real stupid way of thinking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 29, 2015 Author Share Posted September 29, 2015 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Sep 29, 2015 -> 01:01 PM) Read that this morning. It was... awful. That whole article was bad - never seen CSN publish something that bad. Grammatical mistakes all over, complete misses on how some prospects were doing... just a really lackluster effort. I'd put any of the FS writers' version of this over what CSN published. I didn't say anything, because I was wondering if it was just me... The regular usage of fielding percentages was another messing item that stood out to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 29, 2015 -> 07:44 PM) I didn't say anything, because I was wondering if it was just me... The regular usage of fielding percentages was another messing item that stood out to me. either way, many thanks for getting the info to us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 Looks like this guy is a part time writer, backup guy for CSN. I sent a note to Dan Hayes to at least run it through the editing wash one more time - something I have never done before. But this is pretty bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palehosefan Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 I guess I missed the issues. Article wasn't anything overly detailed, but gets the point across to Sox fans that aren't inclined to follow the minors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Sep 29, 2015 -> 08:30 PM) Looks like this guy is a part time writer, backup guy for CSN. I sent a note to Dan Hayes to at least run it through the editing wash one more time - something I have never done before. But this is pretty bad. way to go.... lots of guts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 QUOTE (Palehosefan @ Sep 29, 2015 -> 07:48 PM) I guess I missed the issues. Article wasn't anything overly detailed, but gets the point across to Sox fans that aren't inclined to follow the minors. Poorly written, basically reads like someone just read the boxscores. Example: Anderson's defense has improved this year enough that it seems like he'll stick. We know that due to first hand reports from both ourselves and prospect guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Sep 30, 2015 -> 04:52 PM) Poorly written, basically reads like someone just read the boxscores. Example: Anderson's defense has improved this year enough that it seems like he'll stick. We know that due to first hand reports from both ourselves and prospect guys. i know i probable have the worst command of english on this board, but man, even i can see where that is bad writing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.