Jump to content

AND THATS A WHITE SOX WINNER!!!!


southsider2k5
 Share

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (flavum @ Sep 11, 2014 -> 04:35 PM)
I think 8-8 will keep them in the top 10, and since I predicted 74-88 before the season started, I'd take that.

 

I think I went with 77 and 85 or something like that so a bit optimistic but if Avi didn't get injured they'd probably be a couple games better. The rest of the injuries were just the usual stuff but Avi's was a bit of a freak play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (flavum @ Sep 11, 2014 -> 02:35 PM)
I think 8-8 will keep them in the top 10, and since I predicted 74-88 before the season started, I'd take that.

 

Seconded. Nice 11 game improvement over last year shows progress to prospective FA's and should maintain the protected pick. Fortunately, the Mets, Pads, Reds and Phils have been playing well enough to stay ahead of the Sox. Hope that continues. Probably won't catch the teams below us (maybe Houston), but a great pick can be had at #9, 10 or 11.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Sep 11, 2014 -> 06:00 PM)
Speaking of which, does anyone know the last time an AL pitcher has done that?

 

Pedro in 2000 had an ERA of 1.74. That was an ERA plus of (get ready...) 291. Sale's ERA+ is "only" 190.

 

Pedro Martinez is possibly the greatest pitcher of all time. You check his B-Ref page and it blows you away. Dude was dominating during the steroid era, just filthy.

Edited by chitownsportsfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Leonard Zelig @ Sep 11, 2014 -> 06:02 PM)
Pedro in 2000.

 

 

QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ Sep 11, 2014 -> 06:04 PM)
Pedro in 2000 had an ERA of 1.74. That was an ERA plus of (get ready...) 291. Sale's ERA+ is "only" 190.

 

Pedro Martinez is possibly the greatest pitcher of all time. You check his B-Ref page and it blows you away. Dude was dominating during the steroid era, just filthy.

Had a feeling it was Pedro. And ya, he was something else. Thanks guys.

Edited by Rowand44
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ Sep 11, 2014 -> 06:04 PM)
Pedro in 2000 had an ERA of 1.74. That was an ERA plus of (get ready...) 291. Sale's ERA+ is "only" 190.

 

Pedro Martinez is possibly the greatest pitcher of all time. You check his B-Ref page and it blows you away. Dude was dominating during the steroid era, just filthy.

That is probably the reason he was dominate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ Sep 11, 2014 -> 06:04 PM)
Pedro in 2000 had an ERA of 1.74. That was an ERA plus of (get ready...) 291. Sale's ERA+ is "only" 190.

 

Pedro Martinez is possibly the greatest pitcher of all time. You check his B-Ref page and it blows you away. Dude was dominating during the steroid era, just filthy.

 

His peak is the best we've ever seen. Ever.

 

QUOTE (ptatc @ Sep 11, 2014 -> 06:55 PM)
That is probably the reason he was dominate.

 

gmafb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...