Jump to content

Paulino option to be declined


southsider2k5
 Share

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (pettie4sox @ Oct 31, 2014 -> 02:48 PM)
If he pitched all year, we might have got a 1st round pick instead.

 

Stupid, stupid Hahn.

 

he was done, you could have put a fork in him. the sox created

a fake injury as not to embarrass him.

 

Hahn was stupid for not having other options with fa's signing.

I guess the salary limit that higher management may had

something to say about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 30, 2014 -> 10:32 PM)
Fresh off of the presses from the land of Duh.

 

White Sox Rumors - MLBTradeRumors.com

9 mins ·

White Sox To Decline Option On Felipe Paulino http://dlvr.it/7MsBXt

 

 

This is a good thing. My guess there will be plenty of reclamation projects out there to look at if we just want to take some chances at reasonable prices. Paulino just didn't work out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 31, 2014 -> 01:56 PM)
Daryl Van Schouwen ‏@CST_soxvan 7m7 minutes ago

 

White Sox officially decline rhp Felipe Paulino $4-million club option for 2015 ($250,000 buyout). 40-man roster remains at 37.

 

40 man is really 34.

 

Konerko (retiring) Lindstrom (free agent) Jones(60 day DL)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Oct 31, 2014 -> 04:18 PM)
35. Jones will have to be re-instated from the 60 day DL.

 

Oh yeah. They have to do that for risk to losing him in rule 5 draft right? But after that, they can put him back on the 60 day DL because of the TJ surgery, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Oct 31, 2014 -> 04:20 PM)
Oh yeah. They have to do that for risk to losing him in rule 5 draft right? But after that, they can put him back on the 60 day DL because of the TJ surgery, correct?

 

No, there's just no 60 day DL (or DL in general, for that matter) in the offseason.

 

If they didn't want to keep him on the 40-man, they'd have to non-tender him or DFA him, both of which would put him on waivers and he would be in a different organization next year. It would be a bad thing to remove him from the 40-man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Oct 31, 2014 -> 04:22 PM)
No, there's just no 60 day DL (or DL in general, for that matter) in the offseason.

 

If they didn't want to keep him on the 40-man, they'd have to non-tender him or DFA him, both of which would put him on waivers and he would be in a different organization next year. It would be a bad thing to remove him from the 40-man.

 

They can't put him on the DL until near the end of spring training when the DL opens up again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...