The Democrat Thread Options

[StrangeSox]

Terrible headline, but an article ripping Rahm is always good:

Rahm Emanuel’s Zombie Pigs vs. Chicago’s Angry Birds

It all starts with the person who seems committed to win the current spirited competition as the most loathsome person in American political life: Mayor Rahm Emanuel. The same Mayor overseeing the closing of fifty-four schools and six community mental health clinics under the justification of a “budgetary crisis” has announced that the city will be handing over more than $100 million to DePaul University for a new basketball arena. This is part of a mammoth redevelopment project on South Lakeshore Drive consisting of a convention center anchored by an arena for a non-descript basketball team that has gone 47-111 over the last five years. It’s also miles away from DePaul’s campus. These aren’t the actions of a mayor. They’re the actions of a mad king.

If you want to understand why Mayor Rahm has approval ratings to rival Rush Limbaugh in Harlem, you can point to priorities like these. The school closures are taking place entirely in communities of color while the city's elite feed with crazed abandon at an increasingly sapped trough. As Karen Lewis, the Chicago Teachers Union chief who led a victorious strike last September fueled by rage at Mayor Rahm, said, “When the mayor claims he is facing unprecedented budget problems, he has a choice to make. He is choosing between putting our communities first or continuing the practice of handing out millions of public dollars to private operators, even in the toughest of times.”

It’s hardly just the labor-left of Chicago pointing out how breathtakingly heartless these priorities are. Rick Telander, the lead sports columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times, penned a piece subtly titled, “With Rahm’s DePaul plan, we’ve entered a new arena of stupidity.” After making clear that DePaul’s team is hardly a magnet for city hoops fans, Telander wrote, “But forget that. Guess who will have to cough up about $100 million to build the thing for the private Catholic university of 25,000, through bonds and the usual sneak attacks of wallet-siphonage—Yes! Taxpayers! Ta-dah!”

Short of *maybe* something like the Olympics that can get a whole bunch of infrastructure and transportation built along with it, there's no justification for publicly funding private sports stadiums. They are almost universally money-losers.

[StrangeSox]

Lol, ah, so the "OMG LOOK HOW RACIST WE WERE IN THE 80's" was the true intent.

And is prosecuting women who use crack a bad thing?

It's more that they were prosecuted for harming the baby. But it turns out drinking is much, much more harmful and yet we don't prosecute pregnant women who drink like we did with pregnant women who used crack.

I thought you'd appreciate the first comment on the article, which is true:

While I agree with all that you wrote here, we shouldn't forget the role that black leaders played in amping up the hysteria over crack cocaine. And it's hard to blame them for it, considering the way the crack wars hit the community

[Jenksismybitch]

It's more that they were prosecuted for harming the baby. But it turns out drinking is much, much more harmful and yet we don't prosecute pregnant women who drink like we did with pregnant women who used crack.

I thought you'd appreciate the first comment on the article, which is true:

The obvious difference being that with crack use is always illegal but with alcohol it's not. But I'd be in favor of making it illegal/punishable to drink (excessively) while pregnant.

[DukeNukeEm]

It's more that they were prosecuted for harming the baby. But it turns out drinking is much, much more harmful and yet we don't prosecute pregnant women who drink like we did with pregnant women who used crack.

I honestly dont know how the "KEEP THE GOVERNMENT OUT OF MY VAGINA" crowd would take that.

[mr_genius]

I honestly dont know how the "KEEP THE GOVERNMENT OUT OF MY VAGINA" crowd would take that.

they should be against prosecuting anyone that harms an unborn baby in any way. It's simply a bunch of useless goo.

[Soxbadger]

they should be against prosecuting anyone that harms an unborn baby in any way. It's simply a bunch of useless goo.

Absolutely.

Anything else is completely hypocritical and cant be rationally supported. Now obviously you can make an argument if it was illegal to abort after X weeks, then you can also prosecute after X weeks, but to prosecute for something done when it was legal to abort is inane.