Sleepy Harold Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Los White Sox @loswhitesox now Hemos activado a David Robertson de la lista de paternidad; Michael Ynoa ha sido designado para asignación. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Ynoa just cannot throw enough strikes. If he couldn't improve after working with Cooper he's probably done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Interesting move when you have both Infante and Minaya on the 25 man. Both have options, and Infante would have been the easy choice. This also opens a spot on the 40 man. Either the Sox are just flat done with Ynoa and Coop gave up, or there is a roster move impending adding someone to the 40 man. Minaya is younger and still has a (small) chance of being a part of the next bullpen that matters, but Infante is over 30 and has no chance of being a part of the future. Weird to get rid of Ynoa who is at least somewhat intriguing due to his stature and arm when a guy like Infante could get optioned again without even losing him. Are the Sox signing Bartolo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 01:19 PM) Interesting move when you have both Infante and Minaya on the 25 man. Both have options, and Infante would have been the easy choice. This also opens a spot on the 40 man. Either the Sox are just flat done with Ynoa and Coop gave up, or there is a roster move impending adding someone to the 40 man. Minaya is younger and still has a (small) chance of being a part of the next bullpen that matters, but Infante is over 30 and has no chance of being a part of the future. Weird to get rid of Ynoa who is at least somewhat intriguing due to his stature and arm when a guy like Infante could get optioned again without even losing him. Are the Sox signing Bartolo? It could also be that Ynoa asked out of the organization too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 01:41 PM) It could also be that Ynoa asked out of the organization too. I doubt that. He is out of options, so for him asking out of the organization is basically asking to be DFA'd with no guarantee on finding another MLB job. Seems like a stretch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
username Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 12:19 PM) Interesting move when you have both Infante and Minaya on the 25 man. Both have options, and Infante would have been the easy choice. This also opens a spot on the 40 man. Either the Sox are just flat done with Ynoa and Coop gave up, or there is a roster move impending adding someone to the 40 man. Minaya is younger and still has a (small) chance of being a part of the next bullpen that matters, but Infante is over 30 and has no chance of being a part of the future. Weird to get rid of Ynoa who is at least somewhat intriguing due to his stature and arm when a guy like Infante could get optioned again without even losing him. Are the Sox signing Bartolo? Wow I actually think the Bartolo move is very possible. Why not? Throw him out there a few times and see if he recovers value. Worst case maybe an August move guy. Other than that, maybe related to adding guys to the 40 man roster like you said? Would probably have to be a Q move since that would involve guys close to the majors and the quantity to create a squeeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (Username @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 01:59 PM) Wow I actually think the Bartolo move is very possible. Why not? Throw him out there a few times and see if he recovers value. Worst case maybe an August move guy. Other than that, maybe related to adding guys to the 40 man roster like you said? Would probably have to be a Q move since that would involve guys close to the majors and the quantity to create a squeeze. It just begs the question why you'd DFA Ynoa when you could have just optioned Infante. Seems like the Sox are trying to clear a 40 man spot. Lopez, Giolito, Gonzalez, Moncada and Saladino are already on it. Basically the only guy in AAA with a shot at being called up right now that is not on the 40 man is Delmonico. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 02:06 PM) It just begs the question why you'd DFA Ynoa when you could have just optioned Infante. Seems like the Sox are trying to clear a 40 man spot. Lopez, Giolito, Gonzalez, Moncada and Saladino are already on it. Basically the only guy in AAA with a shot at being called up right now that is not on the 40 man is Delmonico. Which is why the idea that it has to be something abnormal coming into play here came to me. On the surface it doesn't make sense, so what is going on behind the scenes that now the team is more interested in Infante than Ynoa? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 03:13 PM) Which is why the idea that it has to be something abnormal coming into play here came to me. On the surface it doesn't make sense, so what is going on behind the scenes that now the team is more interested in Infante than Ynoa? Are they clearing space to make a waiver claim? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 02:34 PM) Are they clearing space to make a waiver claim? If that were the case, they could have just done it when they were awarded the claim. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 what if they just thought this was an ideal time to DFA him and still keep him in org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (bmags @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 02:38 PM) what if they just thought this was an ideal time to DFA him and still keep him in org Also possible, but with a lot of teams looking for relief help, I don't know that I believe that.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Lopez's Ghost Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 02:34 PM) Are they clearing space to make a waiver claim? Or a 1 for 2 trade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
username Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 I think Bartolo is the most feasible reason (if there is really a move coming), because he's officially a FA today. Would make sense if they anticipate trading Holland and Q this month. Prevents them from having to expose the young guys. Rotation would then likely be Rodon/Shields/Pelfrey/MiGo/Bartolo. [insert puke emojii] Honestly though who knows. They could just roll with Holmberg and I don't think Lopez is that far off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
username Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (Al Lopez's Ghost @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 01:56 PM) Or a 1 for 2 trade? Yeah that's possible. Outside of Q though who do we think would net two 40 man (thus close to the show) guys? Kahnle? Maybe Robertson? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Ynoa has been stinking the joint up and is out of options. His velocity is down as well. He probably won't be claimed, and will be with the Knights shortly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (Username @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 03:02 PM) I think Bartolo is the most feasible reason (if there is really a move coming), because he's officially a FA today. Would make sense if they anticipate trading Holland and Q this month. Prevents them from having to expose the young guys. Rotation would then likely be Rodon/Shields/Pelfrey/MiGo/Bartolo. [insert puke emojii] Honestly though who knows. They could just roll with Holmberg and I don't think Lopez is that far off. There is absolutely zero reason for the White Sox to bring in Bartolo Colon. He is a free agent after this year, and any team who wants him already could have him as soon as he clears. The Sox aren't going this direction at this time of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 I doubt Bartolo would come to a team with no chance anyways. His last time with the White Sox left a bad taste in KW's mouth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Guys, the obvious answer is that GarPax has taken over from Hahn. Flexibility! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 (edited) QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 03:05 PM) There is absolutely zero reason for the White Sox to bring in Bartolo Colon. He is a free agent after this year, and any team who wants him already could have him as soon as he clears. The Sox aren't going this direction at this time of the season. Ehh. It makes a little sense. If the Sox move (or DFA) three out of Q, Holland, Pelfrey, Shields and Gonzalez, they need someone to fill the rotation along with Rodon and Lopez. Giolito should NOT pitch in the big leagues this year. Signing Bartolo to a pro-rated minimum deal and letting him absorb 10 starts will enhance the tanking, and what is the negative? Edited July 6, 2017 by ChiSox59 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 03:19 PM) Ehh. It makes a little sense. If the Sox move (or DFA) three out of Q, Holland, Pelfrey, Shields and Gonzalez, they need someone to fill the rotation along with Rodon and Lopez. Giolito should NOT pitch in the big leagues this year. Signing Bartolo to a pro-rated minimum deal and letting him absorb 10 starts will enhance the tanking, and what is the negative? Shields isn't going anywhere. No one will want him unless something crazy happens. Come August 1st, I think our rotation looks like... Rodon, Shields, Lopez, Holmberg, Covey/Danish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 03:33 PM) Shields isn't going anywhere. No one will want him unless something crazy happens. Come August 1st, I think our rotation looks like... Rodon, Shields, Lopez, Holmberg, Covey/Danish Coop literally just said like 2 weeks ago that Holmberg is not a starter. I'd be surprised to see him make more than a spot start here or there the rest of the way. Unfortunately Covey will be back at some point. I kind of doubt we see Danish as a starter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Well Waddya Ynoa? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Don't misunderstand me, I am not pinning for Bartolo F'in Colon at all. Mainly just spitballing. And I still think this Ynoa thing is weird. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Jul 6, 2017 -> 03:35 PM) Coop literally just said like 2 weeks ago that Holmberg is not a starter. I'd be surprised to see him make more than a spot start here or there the rest of the way. Unfortunately Covey will be back at some point. I kind of doubt we see Danish as a starter. My guess is that there is also a fair chance that some of the return in these trades are guys that can fill in spots today as well. I'd also follow up my original post with a guess that no one wants Mike Pelfrey, and if we need to keep a veteran for a spot the rest of the season, we will be just keeping the one we already have instead of adding another. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.