Jump to content

GT Chicago vs Chicago, 6/19/19, 7:05 CT


soxfan49
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, SoxAce said:

I still don't understand why Tilson isn't in. Is he that bad against lefties? Honest question I haven't looked at his numbers.

He should have been in tonight and bunting all night against Lester

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Moan4Yoan said:

I’m just being realistic.  Sox aren’t getting the top guys.  He’s the best RF available and I think the Sox could actually sign him.

1.  No you’re not, you’re just being your usual Negative Nancy self.

2.  Only a Sith speaks in absolutes.

3. Ozuna is a significantly better player than Puig and capable of playing RF.  I’d take Castellanos over him as well.

4. Anyone can fucking sign a guy who currently has negative fWAR and hasn’t had a 3 win season since 2014.  The Sox fan so much better when they’ll be sitting a good $80M to $90M to work with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SoxAce said:

I still don't understand why Tilson isn't in. Is he that bad against lefties? Honest question I haven't looked at his numbers.

Because Alonzo can hit a three run homer and Tilson most likely not.

Although Alonzo sucks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chicago White Sox said:

1.  No you’re not, you’re just being your usual Negative Nancy self.

2.  Only a Sith speaks in absolutes.

3. Ozuna is a significantly better player than Puig and capable of playing RF.  I’d take Castellanos over him as well.

4. Anyone can fucking sign a guy who currently has negative fWAR and hasn’t had a 3 win season since 2014.  The Sox fan so much better when they’ll be sitting a good $80M to $90M to work with.

Ozuna probably can't play RF with his shoulder issues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 2Deep said:

Because Alonzo can hit a three run homer and Tilson most likely not.

Although Alonzo sucks

It's crazy considering how by the book Ricky is with managing. If that's the case, put the RH hitting Rondon in. He has power. 

Edited by SoxAce
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chicago White Sox said:

1.  No you’re not, you’re just being your usual Negative Nancy self.

2.  Only a Sith speaks in absolutes.

3. Ozuna is a significantly better player than Puig and capable of playing RF.  I’d take Castellanos over him as well.

4. Anyone can fucking sign a guy who currently has negative fWAR and hasn’t had a 3 win season since 2014.  The Sox fan so much better when they’ll be sitting a good $80M to $90M to work with.

It’s not being a negative Nancy when history has proven me right.  Ozuna is a pipe dream and Puig is realistic IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

1.  No you’re not, you’re just being your usual Negative Nancy self.

2.  Only a Sith speaks in absolutes.

3. Ozuna is a significantly better player than Puig and capable of playing RF.  I’d take Castellanos over him as well.

4. Anyone can fucking sign a guy who currently has negative fWAR and hasn’t had a 3 win season since 2014.  The Sox fan so much better when they’ll be sitting a good $80M to $90M to work with.

Sign Corey Dickerson and Castellanos and our lineup would be a force to be reckoned with,

Edited by GermanSoxFan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SoxAce said:

It's crazy considering how by the book Ricky is with managing. If that's the case, put the RH hitting Rondon in. He has power. 

good call, and if they bring in a righty, then you give Collins a chance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BackDoorBreach said:

Only thing I can think of is they wanted a longer look at Cordell since he will be going down with Jay.  

Was just going to say the same thing. Jay is on the 60-day, so someone is going to have to be DFA. Not sure there's anyone they can transfer for that long of a period. Maybe Burr?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Kyyle23 unpinned and locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...