Jump to content

Kelly to IL (strained hamstring - out a monthish); Banks up


Heads22
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Heads22 changed the title to Kelly to IL (strained hamstring - out a monthish); Banks up

How are these professional athletes who supposedly have the best training and training staffs constantly getting these type of injuries? Kelly was just throwing a pitch and he strains a hamstring. Are they not stretching enough? Are they lifting too many weights or not enough ? It is like professional baseball players are made of glass now. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, chw42 said:

Kelly is getting paid $8.5 million this year. And he'll more or less end up missing 2 months of the season out of the gate. Great job FO. 

Spending any amount of FA money on relievers unless it's just "fuck you" money where it doesn't affect any other financial decision -- is beyond stupid. I don't always or even at all agree with Josh Nelson but his tweet about how the Sox do well as an org with cheap relievers yet signed a bunch of older, aging expensive ones anyways -- was spot on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, chitownsportsfan said:

Spending any amount of FA money on relievers unless it's just "fuck you" money where it doesn't affect any other financial decision -- is beyond stupid. I don't always or even at all agree with Josh Nelson but his tweet about how the Sox do well as an org with cheap relievers yet signed a bunch of older, aging expensive ones anyways -- was spot on.

There were a decent amount of mid to back end bullpen guys that took one year deals for less AAV they could have also rolled with.

Edited by Bob Sacamano
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chw42 said:

Kelly is getting paid $8.5 million this year. And he'll more or less end up missing 2 months of the season out of the gate. Great job FO. 

That's about 1/3 of the contract insurance will pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ptatc said:

That's about 1/3 of the contract insurance will pay.

Isn't it closer to 60-65% of salary for that time missed?

As for the White Sox, Lloyd's of London should probably avoid insuring them at all costs.  Losing proposition unless the premiums are out of the stratosphere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, caulfield12 said:

Isn't it closer to 60-65% of salary for that time missed?

As for the White Sox, Lloyd's of London should probably avoid insuring them at all costs.  Losing proposition unless the premiums are out of the stratosphere.

All depends on the deal they get. The bigger the contract the less of it that is covered.

I was just estimating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...