JUSTgottaBELIEVE Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 3 hours ago, Chicago White Sox said: I mean, Robert’s career .203 ISO would rank 40th overall amongst qualified hitters right now and his .278 ISO in 2023 would rank 14th this year. You may think his 2023 ISO is flukey, but we’re talking about a guy with 92% percentile bat speed and 97% percentile Max EV. The dude is a legit power hitter who just happens to play CF. His game power may not always be super elite, but let’s not pretend he’s not well above average overall. I’m looking at a guy with 19 homers across 518 at bats since the start of 2024. He’s also been a consistent 84 wRC+ hitter both seasons. There’s nothing well above average about that offensive production. Yes, 2023 was well above average output but it certainly doesn’t seem like he’s going to replicate that season again (just like I don’t see Mullins replicating 2021). At least not with the White Sox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snopek Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 13 hours ago, southsider2k5 said: This just reads like how the Sox operate in free agency. Instead of the top rated guys, we try to squint and find the almost as good guy for cheaper. To take the vision metaphor one step further, I feel like they purposely take off their glasses so they can do the squinting thing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FT35 Posted May 10 Share Posted May 10 It wasn’t smart to think Robert would increase his trade value while hitting in this lineup. If they wanted to deal him for something of value, why not pick up a couple of cheap vets a couple years ago to put around him to increase the probability of him putting up positive numbers these last 2 years? Someone to drive in? Someone capable of driving him in? If not, why not just move him for the low return that will match the player he is in this lineup? They could have already had their AA bust player for 2 years and saved that poor guy getting his hopes up for developing properly and becoming something. How about initiating some sort of plan to trigger some sort of statistical relevance to his ABs? Are they banking on his value coming from what he’s maybe capable of doing in a good lineup? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted May 10 Share Posted May 10 (edited) 15 hours ago, FT35 said: It wasn’t smart to think Robert would increase his trade value while hitting in this lineup. If they wanted to deal him for something of value, why not pick up a couple of cheap vets a couple years ago to put around him to increase the probability of him putting up positive numbers these last 2 years? Someone to drive in? Someone capable of driving him in? If not, why not just move him for the low return that will match the player he is in this lineup? They could have already had their AA bust player for 2 years and saved that poor guy getting his hopes up for developing properly and becoming something. How about initiating some sort of plan to trigger some sort of statistical relevance to his ABs? Are they banking on his value coming from what he’s maybe capable of doing in a good lineup? There's no such thing as a cheap veteran who is consistent enough to do as you suggest. They picked up cheap veterans Tauchman, Slater, Rojas and they all got injured. Anyone who cost over $5M they weren't signing. And even then a $10M per year player who is a little better expects a multi year contract when they are a free agent. What you suggested either does not exist or was not an option for Reinsdorf. If I was to make wishes I would've wished for a lot more than you did. They pretty much had the same chance of happening the past couple off seasons. Edited May 10 by CaliSoxFanViaSWside 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaleAleSox Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 Bob's article today says the Mets are showing interest and the Sox are eye Blake Tidwell as part of it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUSTgottaBELIEVE Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 12 minutes ago, PaleAleSox said: Bob's article today says the Mets are showing interest and the Sox are eye Blake Tidwell as part of it. Tidwell is a 45 FV prospect. Nice. Him and someone like Eli Serrano is about what I would expect in return for Robert. But need to trade Robert soon before injuries become a concern again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harold's Leg Lift Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 The Mets definitely need an upgrade in CF. They made a run at Robert late in spring trainng. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 22 minutes ago, Harold's Leg Lift said: The Mets definitely need an upgrade in CF. They made a run at Robert late in spring trainng. For? Baty is off the market. Alvarez is not a need. We have a handful of Luisangel Acunas... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUSTgottaBELIEVE Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 13 minutes ago, caulfield12 said: For? Baty is off the market. Alvarez is not a need. We have a handful of Luisangel Acunas... A lot of people around here disliked the idea of Baty and Acuna in return for Robert a few months ago. Highly doubt the Sox get a better package than that now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmy U Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 27 minutes ago, caulfield12 said: For? Baty is off the market. Alvarez is not a need. We have a handful of Luisangel Acunas... Not sure Baty is off the market. They don’t really have a spot for him. If I’m the Mets, I might try to sell high on him off a 5 game hot streak. I question whether he’s a fit for the Sox. They have a lot of 3b types. Would they move him to 1b? LF? Not exactly premium return. If I could get Robert for Baty and a low level minor leaguer, I would jump on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 They only had one T100 going into the year right? Jett? Hopefully our scouts can find some diamonds in the rough if they take a few guys that are few years away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaleAleSox Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 His name is apparently Blade and not Blake. Do not like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitekrazy Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 (edited) 2 hours ago, Harold's Leg Lift said: The Mets definitely need an upgrade in CF. They made a run at Robert late in spring trainng. The Sox will not really have a decent CF if they trade him. We shall find out how big that hole will be even in August. Be an opposing GM and remove your sense of being a fan and you can easily think of reasons for not giving anything of value. A guy who looks lost at the plate is going to look even worse if he had to face more NL pitching. Sure you will probably get some minor leagues guys you will never hear of. We have plenty of those. Then there's always the soon to be DFA players. They got enough of those. I don't seem the harm of keeping him other than the absurd business of baseball that my provide one sided results. GMs also know the Sox are weak in identifying talent. Oh maybe the Sox will get another pitcher that if somehow becomes very good they can trade him. The rinse and repeat of habitually losing small market teams. The Central version of the Marlins. Edited May 11 by kitekrazy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmy U Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 If you trade Robert for Blade Tidwell, it is a salary dump. Then they'll flip Tidwell for Cash Considerations. Huge win for this franchise. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 57 minutes ago, kitekrazy said: The Sox will not really have a decent CF if they trade him. We shall find out how big that hole will be even in August. Be an opposing GM and remove your sense of being a fan and you can easily think of reasons for not giving anything of value. A guy who looks lost at the plate is going to look even worse if he had to face more NL pitching. Sure you will probably get some minor leagues guys you will never hear of. We have plenty of those. Then there's always the soon to be DFA players. They got enough of those. I don't seem the harm of keeping him other than the absurd business of baseball that my provide one sided results. GMs also know the Sox are weak in identifying talent. Oh maybe the Sox will get another pitcher that if somehow becomes very good they can trade him. The rinse and repeat of habitually losing small market teams. The Central version of the Marlins. Just need someone who can run and get it. Michael Taylor is that guy. Long-term solution probably isn’t in the org yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 4 hours ago, PaleAleSox said: Bob's article today says the Mets are showing interest and the Sox are eye Blake Tidwell as part of it. Just what the Sox need — another pitching prospect, and a bad one at that. What an epic drop in value for Robert. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 36 minutes ago, Bob Sacamano said: Just need someone who can run and get it. Michael Taylor is that guy. Long-term solution probably isn’t in the org yet. That's where we fast track our most recent collegiate outfield first rounder (see 2025 pick when it comes in) into the 2027 OD outfield picture in CF with Braden in RF...maybe Benintendi is still in LF since JR will refuse to eat his salary until that final year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tnetennba Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 4 hours ago, Timmy U said: Not sure Baty is off the market. They don’t really have a spot for him. If I’m the Mets, I might try to sell high on him off a 5 game hot streak. I question whether he’s a fit for the Sox. They have a lot of 3b types. Would they move him to 1b? LF? Not exactly premium return. If I could get Robert for Baty and a low level minor leaguer, I would jump on it. I certainly wouldn't consider Baty off the market either, and If the Mets could trade Baty for Robert, I think they would do it in heartbeat. But I don't know what Baty does for the Sox at this stage of the rebuild. He feels like a Vargas type of acquisition, where former prospect status makes one think he has value, but the numbers in the Majors say otherwise. He's had nearly 700 AB's with the Mets, and had he hit consistently, he wouldn't have lost the starting 3B job to Vientos. I also believe he is out of options, so while he has a number of years of control left, he's basically another guy they have to roster or risk losing for nothing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PitchatRisktoZisk Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 Is Robert hurt? I haven't seen him in the lineup this weekend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestEddy Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 15 minutes ago, PitchatRisktoZisk said: Is Robert hurt? I haven't seen him in the lineup this weekend. Ouchy knee. They're giving him and Vargas (ouchy calf) a couple days off around the off day tomorrow to get them right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted May 11 Share Posted May 11 9 hours ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said: A lot of people around here disliked the idea of Baty and Acuna in return for Robert a few months ago. Highly doubt the Sox get a better package than that now. Those guys are utility infielders. I'd try to get someone like Boston Baro - a guy deep in the minors but who could turn out to be something. I understand that Robert's numbers are poor so he's risky; but he's also high-reward. Some team will pay for him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted May 12 Share Posted May 12 1 hour ago, GreenSox said: Those guys are utility infielders. I'd try to get someone like Boston Baro - a guy deep in the minors but who could turn out to be something. I understand that Robert's numbers are poor so he's risky; but he's also high-reward. Some team will pay for him. [HeGetzUs has entered the chat] 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUSTgottaBELIEVE Posted May 12 Share Posted May 12 2 hours ago, GreenSox said: Those guys are utility infielders. I'd try to get someone like Boston Baro - a guy deep in the minors but who could turn out to be something. I understand that Robert's numbers are poor so he's risky; but he's also high-reward. Some team will pay for him. Utility infielders that have a higher fWAR than Luis Robert this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcq Posted May 12 Share Posted May 12 7 minutes ago, JUSTgottaBELIEVE said: Utility infielders that have a higher fWAR than Luis Robert this season. Why spend money on a head case who has no leadership skills and just wants to chill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted May 12 Share Posted May 12 2 hours ago, GreenSox said: Those guys are utility infielders. I'd try to get someone like Boston Baro - a guy deep in the minors but who could turn out to be something. I understand that Robert's numbers are poor so he's risky; but he's also high-reward. Some team will pay for him. Not what the Sox once wanted, no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.