January 14, 200620 yr EDIT: NM, JUST SAW THE OTHER THREAD NOW, SORRY (and yes, spelling Pittsburgh like that was a typo) Just letting you know that it's on now, but according to Comcast's site, it's a one time thing. I've never been able to get into hockey because of their BS home game policy so I don't care as much but I'm sure there are fans here Edited January 14, 200620 yr by 3 BeWareTheNewSox 5
January 14, 200620 yr If you went to a game you would get into it. Hockey is the best sport in person, it really sucks on TV. Although the Hawks are now undefeated at home when it is televised in Chicago this season :-)
January 15, 200620 yr QUOTE(JoeBatterz @ Jan 14, 2006 -> 04:02 PM) If you went to a game you would get into it. Hockey is the best sport in person, it really sucks on TV. Although the Hawks are now undefeated at home when it is televised in Chicago this season :-) Bingo. I used to not even bother with Hockey prior to working at the United Center. It really is truly an awesome sport live. And I watched the Blackhawks lived when they f'n sucked and had Theo Fluerry.
January 15, 200620 yr Author QUOTE(JoeBatterz @ Jan 14, 2006 -> 04:02 PM) If you went to a game you would get into it. Hockey is the best sport in person, it really sucks on TV. Although the Hawks are now undefeated at home when it is televised in Chicago this season :-) I've seen the Wolves, live, yes, hockey is sweet in person, but I can't go to all of the games and can't follow a team when only half of the games are on TV. That's the point I was trying to make in the other thread on this, this policy is retarded, as hockey is cool in person, and people are willing to pay to see it. This policy just pisses people off and turns them away. The #3 DMA in the US and the response to this is 'that it costs money to produce games'. It's a shame to waste the HD and a great voice because of Dollar Bill
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.