TLAK Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 (edited) The table on the right tracks O for's. An O for is a game started where the player had no run, hit, rbi, bb, hbp, sh or sf. An O for indicates he did nothing discernable to help the team at the plate that day. Because the team declined in the second half I split it between pre and post All Star game break. What sticks out to me is BA, Crede and Ozuna in the second half. Dispute putting up respectable averages they were just taking up space almost 1/3 of the games. Scotty Pods had a rough year but did something positive almost every day. The table on the left tracks a pitchers outings on a day by day basis. If he achieved and ERA of 3.00 or less on that day I count it as a quality start, 3 to 6 is Meh, greater than 6 is a bad start. No big surprises here. Freddy would have looked very bad without his late surge, he picked up 4 quality starts in September. Buerhle had an career bad season and was still better than Vazquez. Edited November 12, 2006 by TLAK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Very interesting where Crede and Pods ended up on that list; thanks for putting that together TLAK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aboz56 Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Not surprising to see Crede there at all. Out of all of the players in MLB with 30 hrs this past year, he had the lowest OBP and drew the fewest walks. Not good. 28 walks for an entire season is just ugly IMO. Don't get me wrong, I love Crede and think he's great, I'm just not as high on him as some of the other Soxtalkers...cough...greasy....cough....soxnbears...cough....illinikrush.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RME JICO Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 QUOTE(TLAK @ Nov 12, 2006 -> 10:06 AM) The table on the right tracks O for's. An O for is a game started where the player had no run, hit, rbi, bb, hbp, sh or sf. An O for indicates he did nothing discernable to help the team at the plate that day. Because the team declined in the second half I split it between pre and post All Star game break. What sticks out to me is BA, Crede and Ozuna in the second half. Dispute putting up respectable averages they were just taking up space almost 1/3 of the games. Scotty Pods had a rough year but did something positive almost every day. The table on the left tracks a pitchers outings on a day by day basis. If he achieved and ERA of 3.00 or less on that day I count it as a quality start, 3 to 6 is Meh, greater than 6 is a bad start. No big surprises here. Freddy would have looked very bad without his late surge, he picked up 4 quality starts in September. Buerhle had an career bad season and was still better than Vazquez. TLAK, good stuff as always. It would be interesting to see what these numbers would look like if you took negative offensive plays into consideration, like GIDP or CS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 QUOTE(aboz56 @ Nov 12, 2006 -> 09:57 AM) Not surprising to see Crede there at all. Out of all of the players in MLB with 30 hrs this past year, he had the lowest OBP and drew the fewest walks. Not good. 28 walks for an entire season is just ugly IMO. Don't get me wrong, I love Crede and think he's great, I'm just not as high on him as some of the other Soxtalkers...cough...greasy....cough....soxnbears...cough....illinikrush.. What your forgetting is how hard it is to come up with a good 3B. They are hard to come by. Nothing to write home about between Ventura and Crede. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.