Jump to content

RockRaines

Members
  • Posts

    43,333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RockRaines

  1. Hey all, good to see this place has continued to be busy since ive been gone.  Been a long year, got hit by a drunk driver on my  bike that probably should have been the end of me, but the rehab has been long but productive and here I am checking in on you idiots.    Sox take the central next year and Ill be there to watch it.  Hope everyone is good.

     

    Word of advice to anyone who gets seriously injured, take the rehab seriously with tunnel vision.  Just this morning I ran 3 miles sub 9 min on a leg that was shattered earlier this year.  Attack that shit

    • Like 3
    • Haha 1
  2. 4 hours ago, Lillian said:

    Do you guys think that Mitch played well enough to buy some more time for his tenure as the Bears' QB? There aren't really any other options, so barring a trade, it would have to be Daniel. However, it seems that given the short leash that Trubisky likely has, I'm hoping that he shows enough to give us some hope that he could still be the guy, going forward.

    Nope.  Ive known since he was in HS that he wasnt made for primetime.  They need to look for a QB stat.  Dude just cannot process in the NFL quickly enough

  3. 11 minutes ago, caulfield12 said:

    I guess if they don't sign Machado, the reasoning or argument is not going to be the money but the fact that they weren't able to successfully bring him to Chicago during the 2018 season to give him an "audition/tryout" that would have convinced him firsthand of the fit as well as the talent in the pipeline.

    It won’t be the money we lose on. And that’s all we can ask. 

    • Like 2
  4. 11 minutes ago, LittleHurt05 said:

    For all the talk about Watson, I think the biggest no show tonight was the Houston defensive line. Luck had free reign over the secondary.

    The Bears D line cant let that happen.

    Houston’s defense made bad calls all first half. It wasn’t all the line. Fangio won’t make the same mistake. He’s not gonna sit in cover two, in fact nobody ever should. 

  5. On 12/29/2018 at 7:09 AM, SoxBlanco said:

    I’m still confused by this report from Rock. First he said that Schwarber and Heyward “will be dealt”. Then he said they might not be able to move Heyward. So which is it? Do they have a deal in place, or are they just exploring trade options? Doesn’t sound like anything official to me.

    I was just posting what I heard at dinner from a beat reporter. Nothing more. Nothing less. She seemed very confident. 

  6. 6 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said:

    Outside of Madrigal, yeah. The Sox are absolutely loaded with OF. Of their top 10 bats, 7 are OF. The others are Burger and Collins who are 1B/DH types. 

    Jimenez

    Robert

    Rutherford 

    Basabe

    Adolfo

    Walker 

    Gonzalez

    are all OF. 

    I am actually perfectly fine using that depth to acquire MLB pieces if they were to sign Harper, but to each their own. I'd keep Eloy and Robert, but after them anyone is fair game, should Harper sign with the Sox. 

    Eloy and Luis are corners to me. So why block them for five years?  I just don’t get the Harper fit unless hes your future 1B

  7. 1 minute ago, southsideirish71 said:

    They need to hit on either one of Harper or Machado.  Missing out on both, and having one go to the Cubs is a formula for disaster.

    I think they are doing all they can for Machado. Including acquiring his closest friend and brother in law. 

  8. I don’t know it as gospel but the source is reliable based on what they do and where they’ve been. I was shocked. Never thought they’d move Schwarber or Almora.  It also includes some prospect as well. Quite frankly if I was them I’d just add pitching. Their offense is plenty good. Add as many good arms as you can. 

  9. On 12/25/2018 at 1:41 PM, Brian said:

    I kinda find the Starbucks app tough to navigate. I use it to pay and get stars, which I also think they need a better rewards program. Dunkins is far superior.

    It was so much worse before. Consolidating many systems to one was a lot of work. 

  10. 7 hours ago, bigruss said:

    Mannn I hate the SSO tech at my company, went with it because it was already included (Azure) but it feels like they are always playing catchup to you guys and others.  Wish I was here when they decided, the amount of time we spend integrating apps and turning on MFA is ridiculous.  

    Your old company made the switch last year. 

    Microsoft includes our stuff in Azure for a reason. Their security tech is fucking terrible. Almost all of those hosted platforms are spending their time fending off attacks. Instead of going after thousands of orgs they only have one or two targets now. It’s so easy. 

×
×
  • Create New...