Another coach b****in about how flawed replay is in the NFL..

I suppose he makes some valid points, but even though it may slow down the game a bit I think the positives overwhelm the negatives...He's b****in cause a play reviewed by replay went against him, but down the line a big play is gonna help him with the help of replay..

 

Then he'll probably change his view...

What kind of changes do you think should be made to help improve it or is it ok as is...

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?i...artnersite=espn

Personally i hate the reply system. Ruins the pace of the game, and it always seems like every game there has to be at least two replays. Though i am a college football fan and not an NFL fan, so i am kind of biased.

I like how Dungy only starts complaining about the instant replay when his team loses. He was 5-0 and I didn't hear s*** about him complaining, but his precious Colts lose a game, and he blames it on the ineffectiveness of instant replay. Nevermind the fact that in their comeback game against the Buccaneers, the Colts executed a successful onsides kick that the NFL has since deemed was ILLEGAL.

 

Dungy, shut the f*** up. :fyou

Personally i hate the reply system.  Ruins the pace of the game, and it always seems like every game there has to be at least two replays.  Though i am a college football fan and not an NFL fan, so i am kind of biased.

I don't see how anyone could be against it. I don't care if it takes an hour to get the call right as long as the right call is made. That seems like the fair thing to me.

 

Although, I WOULD like to know what some of these referees are looking at under that hooded monitor. Think it could be some porn or something, because it seems like sometimes they look at a play from 234956873489 different angles and they still seem to get it wrong.

I like replay, as long as the exictmeant of the game after the replay is still there