August 26, 200520 yr QUOTE(Spiff @ Aug 26, 2005 -> 10:06 AM) Standard scoring Might I also suggest a RB/WR flex position since there's 2 QB's?
August 27, 200520 yr Author Roster Positions: QB, QB, WR, WR, WR, RB, RB, TE, W/T, W/R, K, DEF, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN I added 1 WR/TE and 1 WR/RB...
August 28, 200520 yr QUOTE(Spiff @ Aug 27, 2005 -> 07:52 AM) standard scoring Define standard scoring. It may differ from whatever the yahoo default is...
August 28, 200520 yr QUOTE(SleepyWhiteSox @ Aug 27, 2005 -> 10:54 PM) Define standard scoring. It may differ from whatever the yahoo default is... The Yahoo standard is this, which is what basically everyone uses. Passing Yards (50 yards per point) Passing Touchdowns (6) Interceptions (-2) Rushing Yards (20 yards per point) Rushing Touchdowns (6) Reception Yards (20 yards per point) Reception Touchdowns (6) Return Touchdowns (6) 2-Point Conversions (2) Fumbles Lost (-2) Offensive Fumble Return TD (6) Field Goals 0-19 Yards (3) Field Goals 20-29 Yards (3) Field Goals 30-39 Yards (3) Field Goals 40-49 Yards (4) Field Goals 50+ Yards (5) Point After Attempt Made (1) Sack (1) Interception (2) Fumble Recovery (2) Touchdown (6) Safety (2) Block Kick (2) Points Allowed 0 points (10) Points Allowed 1-6 points (7) Points Allowed 7-13 points (4) Points Allowed 14-20 points (1) Points Allowed 21-27 points (0) Points Allowed 28-34 points (-1) Points Allowed 35+ points (-4) His system makes no sense. Your QB gets a point for every completion, which means that is by far the most valuable position. Plus they only get -1 for an interception, where the defense gets 3 points for making the interception. It should be 2 and 2. 5 points for a fumble recovery?? 1 point for a field goal under 19 yards? 3 points for a sack? 7 points for a touchdown and then 1 for a PAT? 8 points? Makes no sense at all. It's gonna screw up everyone's team because the highest rated players in standard leagues aren't necessarily the highest rated in this league. Edited August 28, 200520 yr by Spiff
August 29, 200520 yr QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Aug 26, 2005 -> 12:28 AM) So we'll keep it for the 3rd at 1 PM CT. It says Sept 3rd 7pm CT.
September 4, 200520 yr I would highly recommend 1 point per carry for RB's if the QB is going to get a point per completion.
September 5, 200520 yr That doesn't really solve anything though because QB's have 20-30 completions per game, RB's have 20-30 rushing attempts per game, recievers have what, 4-6 catches per game on average? With two flex positions all you need to do is start 2 RB's there and you basically have the week won. That's why we need to get rid of the stats for completions/rushes/receptions altogether. me = :banghead
September 5, 200520 yr Can this be done? Would it work in your opinion? 1pt per completion (25 a game) 1pt per rush (25 a game) 4 or 5pts? a catch (4 to 6 catches = 16-24 or 20-30 pts a game) If that can't be done, or it wouldn't work, then I agree that we should scrap the points for these 3 catergories completely. Lets just make the scoring as fair as possible. Edited September 5, 200520 yr by Credepopsup
September 5, 200520 yr QUOTE(Credepopsup @ Sep 5, 2005 -> 09:23 AM) Can this be done? Would it work in your opinion? 1pt per completion (25 a game) 1pt per rush (25 a game) 4 or 5pts? a catch (4 to 6 catches = 16-24 or 20-30 pts a game) If that can't be done, or it wouldn't work, then I agree that we should scrap the points for these 3 catergories completely. Lets just make the scoring as fair as possible. 2 points for a reception would be more than enough, in my opinion. I kinda like seeing high scores anyways, but WR's aren't really supposed to score more than QB's, and certainly not more than RB's, in FF. That's why below-average starting RB's are drafted before above-average WR's. I just DO NOT want to see lots of WR's scoring on par with RB's and elite QB's since it's easier to stock up on WR's with more positions available for them. Anyways, that's my two cents. I'm all for whatever everyone agrees is fair. I just thought we were going back to default. And another thing I've seen is -1 for an incomplete pass. Just thought I'd throw that out there as a possible option.
September 5, 200520 yr QUOTE(SleepyWhiteSox @ Sep 5, 2005 -> 04:33 PM) I just thought we were going back to default. I did too, but for some reason the commish likes being obstinate. I would leave this league if we hadn't already drafted, it's going to be a mess once the season starts.
January 4, 200620 yr QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Aug 24, 2005 -> 04:42 AM) I'm in, from now on I shall be known as ImTimCouch&UMyb****. I think the name says it all. Oh, and God bless Tatum Bell.
January 5, 200620 yr Lol, no s*** I was lucky. Tatum Bell? Thank goodness I didn't spend too much time adjusting the prerankings.
January 5, 200620 yr QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Jan 5, 2006 -> 12:40 AM) Lol, no s*** I was lucky. Tatum Bell? Thank goodness I didn't spend too much time adjusting the prerankings. Yeah, I had like, 4 guys who got benched by their teams so I got 0 points out of them. :headshake I wish the championship would of been held in week 16. Edited January 5, 200620 yr by knightni
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.