December 19, 200520 yr Just thought I'd point out to any of those who have ESPN Insider that Gammons has a piece up today that seems ChiSox-centric. At least from the first paragraph or so. http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/gammons/sto...%3fid%3d2265121
December 19, 200520 yr I never understood why someone would pay for these baffons? Are they not doing the same thing you or I could do? To think people actually paid money so they could see Steve Phillps being wrong.. Time and Time and time again.
December 19, 200520 yr QUOTE(AnthraxFan93 @ Dec 19, 2005 -> 03:07 PM) I never understood why someone would pay for these baffons? Are they not doing the same thing you or I could do? . No, because your articles last year would have been even MORE wrong, and simply just looked like this. ihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwih tekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihate wihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwi atekwihatekw
December 19, 200520 yr Author QUOTE(AnthraxFan93 @ Dec 19, 2005 -> 02:07 PM) I never understood why someone would pay for these baffons? Are they not doing the same thing you or I could do? To think people actually paid money so they could see Steve Phillps being wrong.. Time and Time and time again. I'm pretty sure no one is paying just for Steve Phillips. Gammons, on the other hand, is a hell of a writer, despite his Red Sox focus.
December 19, 200520 yr No, because your articles last year would have been even MORE wrong, and simply just looked like this. ihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwih tekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihate wihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwihatekwi atekwihatekw <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You forgot.. OC IS GOD, Ortiz over Wright, Don't trade Garland and Paulie for Randy JOhnson, Garland for Webb..
December 19, 200520 yr Good thing Gammons never got his ultimate wish to get the White Sox contracted otherwise he wouldnt be able to rely on his "great writing skills" for such an article. What a joke. Perhaps the biggest homer in sports media, yes ever bigger than Dukie V. Edited December 19, 200520 yr by watchtower41
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.