Bmr31 Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 THink of this. THis lineup is starting to remind me of 2000............AND we have Loaiza and Colon added to the staff........ ......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurcieOne Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 THink of this. THis lineup is starting to remind me of 2000............AND we have Loaiza and Colon added to the staff........ ......... BMR.....do you think this could be the best rotation the White Sox have had in the last fiddy years? Including the 93 staff? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted July 2, 2003 Author Share Posted July 2, 2003 BMR.....do you think this could be the best rotation the White Sox have had in the last fiddy years? Including the 93 staff? Hmmm, i dunno dude, 1983 stafff was awesome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubKilla Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 BMR.....do you think this could be the best rotation the White Sox have had in the last fiddy years? Including the 93 staff? '93 staff was better. JMHO though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 I vote for the 83 staff over 93. But you'd have to look at the mid 60's teams for the best one, imho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted July 2, 2003 Author Share Posted July 2, 2003 I vote for the 83 staff over 93. But you'd have to look at the mid 60's teams for the best one, imho. Yeah i dont remember much before 83, but that was the best staff ive ever seen the sox have.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubKilla Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 I vote for the 83 staff over 93. But you'd have to look at the mid 60's teams for the best one, imho. None of them ever got it done so why debate ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurcieOne Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 '93 staff was better. JMHO though I think that they had a surefire lightsout closer (Roberto)....and we dont(Koch)... so I hafta say 93 was better, oh yeah and they didnt have rick white. However......if Buehrle reverts to old and Colon steps it up (which he must) I think that the rotation could be better than 93...including a CY Young winner in Esty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurcieOne Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 Yeah i dont remember much before 83, but that was the best staff ive ever seen the sox have.... Who was on the 83 staff???? Hoyt.. and the rest i dunno....wasnt born yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted July 2, 2003 Author Share Posted July 2, 2003 Who was on the 83 staff???? Hoyt.. and the rest i dunno....wasnt born yet. s*** DOtson, who won 20 i think.......britt burns who was a stud, Floyd bannister who was a real good pitcher was our 4th guy.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubKilla Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 Who was on the 83 staff???? Hoyt.. and the rest i dunno....wasnt born yet. s*** DOtson, who won 20 i think.......britt burns who was a stud, Floyd bannister who was a real good pitcher was our 4th guy.... Jerry Koosman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurcieOne Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 I think that they had a surefire lightsout closer (Roberto)....and we dont(Koch)... so I hafta say 93 was better, oh yeah and they didnt have rick white. However......if Buehrle reverts to old and Colon steps it up (which he must) I think that the rotation could be better than 93...including a CY Young winner in Esty. Nevermind..... that 93 staff was pretty amazing.....now thinking back on it..... and I think Im so excited right now over this crazy ass day that im over compensating for the s***ty start some of these pitchers have had. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted July 2, 2003 Author Share Posted July 2, 2003 Who was on the 83 staff???? Hoyt.. and the rest i dunno....wasnt born yet. s*** DOtson, who won 20 i think.......britt burns who was a stud, Floyd bannister who was a real good pitcher was our 4th guy.... Jerry Koosman No s***, that was a killer starting 5........the pen wasnt so great but s***, they didnt need to be... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 None of them ever got it done so why debate ? Because it's fun to debate s*** like this! LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 As of now 83 hands down over 93 and '03. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.